SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Developing Country Policy

    16/12/2012: WIPO Visually Impaired Treaty: Voices From Africa On Dire Situation
    14/12/2012: South Korea Bolsters Copyright Strategy In K-Pop Crazy States
    10/12/2012: A Closer Look Into A WIPO Regional Workshop: Making An Instant IP Whiz
    07/12/2012: Inside Views: From South Africa — Keeping Traditional Knowledge Traditional
    28/11/2012: Reshaping The International Copyright System To Facilitate Education In Developing Countries
    27/11/2012: Special Report: With Poor And Uninsured A Majority, Southeast Asia Sees Rise In Generics
    27/11/2012: European Commission, ARIPO Sign Agreement On Agricultural GIs
    21/11/2012: Report Seeks To Advance Global Debate On Technological Transfer
    15/11/2012: Pending Decision On GM Maize In Mexico Under Fire
    14/11/2012: Analysis: Argentine Court Clarifies What Patent Holders Can – And Cannot – Prohibit
    13/11/2012: Philippines Heads Toward Expanded Copyright Law
    12/11/2012: Southeast Asian States Move To Harmonise Their E-Commerce Laws
    08/11/2012: India Publishes Draft Guidelines For Patenting Of TK and Biological Material
    06/11/2012: Inside Views: Sizing Up The “Ill-Conceived” PAIPO Draft Statute
    04/11/2012: Landmark India IP Board Decision Against Hepatitis C Drug Patent
    03/11/2012: Top-Level Domain .Africa Becomes Object Of Bitter Fight
    24/10/2012: Petition Urges Delay, Discussion Of Pan-African IP Organization
    19/10/2012: South Korea Lends IP Training Support To China
    17/10/2012: More Production Not The Way To Sustainable Agriculture, UN Study Says
    09/10/2012: GI Protection Gets Boost In BRICs; Common Definition Needed For International Debates
    05/10/2012: India Ratifies Nagoya Protocol On Biodiversity Access And Benefit-Sharing
    27/09/2012: Move Toward New Pan-African IP Organisation Alarms Observers
    27/09/2012: Google’s Neutrality Stance Tested Yet Again In Brazil
    26/09/2012: Agricultural Innovation Needed In Africa, With Farmers’ Participation, WTO Panellists Say
    24/09/2012: Q&A With Newly Appointed KIPO Commissioner
    20/09/2012: A Brief Look At Botswana’s New IP Law
    20/09/2012: Two Key Laws For The Public Domain Fare Differently In Argentine Congress
    18/09/2012: India: Balancing Public And Private Interests In The Intellectual Property Regime
    29/08/2012: WIPO Drug Research Project Strikes First Agreements
    22/08/2012: Novartis Challenge To India Patent Law Put Off To 11 September
    21/08/2012: MSF: India’s Bayer-Natco Compulsory Licence Case Set For 3 Sept.
    20/08/2012: Health Advocates Eye Proposed Changes To Patent Law In South Africa
    07/08/2012: A Look At India’s Key Pharmaceutical Patent Case
    15/07/2012: Mexican IP Office Hopes To Persuade Senate On ACTA
    06/07/2012: Novartis’ Indian Patent Law Challenge Postponed Again
    03/07/2012: Nagoya Protocol Access & Benefit-Sharing Meeting Kicks Off In New Delhi
    20/06/2012: Inside Views: An Anthem To Ignorance: South Africa’s Case Of Nkosi Sikelel’ iAfrika
    15/06/2012: UNCTAD Report Sees Sustainable African Growth In IP Flexibilities
    01/06/2012: Asian Governments Plan To Better Use TRIPS Flexibilities For Health
    31/05/2012: Compulsory Licences Positive For The South, With Conditions, Study Finds
    29/05/2012: Inside Views: Golden Oldies? South African High Court Looks At What Is “Traditional”
    24/05/2012: US, China To Hold Landmark Intellectual Property Adjudication Meeting
    20/05/2012: India’s Generics-Big Pharma Battle Drops Drug Prices, Raises Legal Debate
    17/05/2012: South Africa Hopes New Bill Brings Traditional Knowledge Protection
    17/05/2012: Singapore Builds Patent Capacity Ahead Of New System
    14/05/2012: Amid “Korean Wave,” South Korea Opens IP Office In The Philippines
    26/04/2012: Day Marked By Initiatives On The Benefits Of IP, Open Technology
    25/04/2012: Book Offers Timely Insights On IP, Drugs And Public Health In Developing Countries
    23/04/2012: Text Of Kenya Judgment On Anti-Counterfeiting Now Available
    21/04/2012: Kenyan High Court’s Overturning Of Anti-Counterfeit Law Hailed
    Your IP address is 184.73.74.47