SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • This is a good summary, except just to clarify one... »
  • Ellen 't Hoen will be a hard act to follow. She p... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Developing Country Policy

    20/05/2012: India’s Generics-Big Pharma Battle Drops Drug Prices, Raises Legal Debate
    17/05/2012: South Africa Hopes New Bill Brings Traditional Knowledge Protection
    17/05/2012: Singapore Builds Patent Capacity Ahead Of New System
    14/05/2012: Amid “Korean Wave,” South Korea Opens IP Office In The Philippines
    26/04/2012: Day Marked By Initiatives On The Benefits Of IP, Open Technology
    25/04/2012: Book Offers Timely Insights On IP, Drugs And Public Health In Developing Countries
    23/04/2012: Text Of Kenya Judgment On Anti-Counterfeiting Now Available
    21/04/2012: Kenyan High Court’s Overturning Of Anti-Counterfeit Law Hailed
    11/04/2012: Trade And Development With A Dash Of IP: Conference To Set Course For UNCTAD
    02/04/2012: Book Details IP Rights And Development
    28/03/2012: Novartis India Challenge Postponed To July
    21/03/2012: Nigerian Courts Step Up Against Copyright Piracy: 18 Convicted
    21/03/2012: Brazil HIV Drug Patent Ruling Allows Generics, Sends Pipeline Process Into Doubt
    18/03/2012: A NEW South Africa Traditional Knowledge Bill – Sui Generis Protection for TK
    16/03/2012: Singapore Seeks To Liberalise Patent Law In Bid To Become IP Hub
    12/03/2012: India Grants First Compulsory Licence, For Bayer Cancer Drug
    05/03/2012: Internet Governance In 2012: Reaching New Heights Or Hitting A Wall
    02/03/2012: Novartis Before India’s Supreme Court: What’s Really At Stake?
    10/02/2012: EU-India Summit Kicks Off Amidst Warnings Of Impact On Medicines Access
    30/01/2012: “Politics Of Intellectual Property” Looks At The National Level
    12/01/2012: Johnson & Johnson Denies Patent Pool Licences For HIV Medicines For The Poor
    03/01/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Posts Of 2011 Tell Story Of International IP Policymaking
    22/12/2011: International Publishers Demand Egyptian Government Stop Attacks
    12/12/2011: Inside Views: Brazil’s Leaked Copyright Reform Draft Bill Shows Latest Thinking
    10/12/2011: New Guide Issued To Help Developing Countries Embrace GIs, As WTO, WIPO Meet
    01/12/2011: Philippines: IP Office Cannot Issue Injunctions On Counterfeit Claims
    30/11/2011: India: Novartis Hearing Postponed To February
    21/11/2011: US, China Hold High-Level Talks On IP Policy
    16/11/2011: Global Action To Open Generic Competition For Key AIDS Drug
    08/11/2011: Inside Views: The Mad Hatter In Wonderland: South Africa’s New TK Bill
    06/11/2011: In Egypt, Director Of Famed Library Of Alexandria Under Fire
    27/10/2011: Inside Views: Plurilateral Trade Agreements Lack Protections for Users, Intermediaries
    25/10/2011: Philippines IP Office: ‘Our Meeting Is Not Fostering Corporate Greed’
    24/10/2011: WIPO Defends Involvement In IP Enforcement Meeting In The Philippines
    06/10/2011: Inside Views: South Africa: TK Legislation In The New Tradition
    14/09/2011: South Africa Conference On IP And Innovation
    06/09/2011: Indian Supreme Court To Hear Novartis Challenge To India’s Patent Law
    11/08/2011: Alto Funcionário Discute Sobre Renúncia Ao Seu Cargo Na ANVISA, No Brasil, Devido à Política Sobre Patentes
    11/08/2011: Top Official Discusses Resignation From Brazil’s ANVISA Over Patent Policy
    08/08/2011: Inside Views: Promoting Caribbean Intellectual Property Law
    30/07/2011: EU-India Agreement In WTO Dispute Raises Bar For EU Drug Seizures
    29/07/2011: Inside Views: A Glance At Current Patent Litigation In India
    19/07/2011: Kenya Opens Region’s Door To GM Maize
    13/07/2011: Inside Views: Does Introduction Of A Utility Model Protection Regime Make Sense In India?
    15/06/2011: An Urgent Letter From Intellectual Property Watch
    27/05/2011: UN Project Examines Better Access To Drugs For The Poor Through Local Production
    16/05/2011: EU Makes Push To Facilitate Geographical Indications In ACP Countries
    14/05/2011: Indigenous Peoples Won’t Be “Wished Away” In Traditional Knowledge Treaty Talks
    12/05/2011: Inside Views: Brazil’s Copyright Reform: Are We All Josef K.?
    10/05/2011: Thorny Issues Remain In EU-India Trade Talks