SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • This is a good summary, except just to clarify one... »
  • Ellen 't Hoen will be a hard act to follow. She p... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge

    28/03/2011: India, WIPO Connect On Traditional Knowledge Protection, With Or Without Patents
    04/03/2011: Draft WIPO Instrument On Genetic Resources Shows Lists Of Options
    04/03/2011: WTO Talks On Geographical Indications Unable To Achieve Lift-Off
    02/03/2011: Patentable Subject Matter, IP Waiver For Health Discussed At WTO
    28/02/2011: Long Week Ahead For WIPO Experts Considering Treaty On IP And Genetic Resources
    25/02/2011: After Folklore, Traditional Knowledge Makes Steps Toward WIPO Treaty Text
    25/02/2011: Negotiators Work From New Text Of Traditional Knowledge Treaty At WIPO
    23/02/2011: WIPO Traditional Knowledge Experts In Small Groups To Craft Treaty Text
    21/02/2011: Experts Work On WIPO Traditional Knowledge Draft Treaty Text
    21/02/2011: Experts: L’Application D’un Nouveau Protocole Sur La Biodiversité Repose Sur Les Réglementations Nationales
    07/02/2011: New Biodiversity Benefit-Sharing Protocol Relies On National Rules, Experts Say
    05/01/2011: IP & Traditional Cultural Expressions: An Unnatural Alliance?
    30/12/2010: Top IP-Watch Stories Of 2010: Copyright Fights, ACTA, Medicines Access
    11/12/2010: WIPO Members Move To Detailed Talks Toward Folklore Treaty
    07/12/2010: Inside Views: Caribbean IP: Ensure Unending Local Protection Of Traditional Knowledge
    06/12/2010: Officials Work To Advance WIPO Treaty To Protect Biological, Traditional Resources
    05/12/2010: Text-Based Talks Begin In Cancun Climate Talks; Civil Society Demands Transparency
    29/11/2010: UN Biodiversity Convention Seeks Expedited Entry Into Force Of Benefit-Sharing Protocol
    29/10/2010: Compromise UN Protocol Treaty Against Biopiracy Adopted In Japan
    27/10/2010: Ministers Arrive To Help Reach Outcome At UN Convention On Biodiversity
    26/10/2010: Biodiversity Benefit-Sharing Treaty Negotiators Tackle New Text As Clock Ticks
    26/10/2010: Protocol on ABS Could Further Impoverish Indigenous Peoples, Groups Claim
    26/10/2010: Climate-Ready Crop Patents Present Danger For Biodiversity, Group Says
    23/10/2010: New Draft Biodiversity Treaty Text Shows Much Work Remains; Co-Chairs Hopeful
    22/10/2010: Biodiversity Negotiators Move Treaty Text Forward; Deadline Pushed To Monday
    21/10/2010: Indigenous Groups Allege Canadian Obstructionism To Biodiversity ABS Protocol
    21/10/2010: Stakeholders Restless About Biodiversity Benefit Sharing Protocol
    21/10/2010: NGOs: Biopiracy Ongoing As Governments Slowly Negotiate International Instrument
    20/10/2010: Copyright Industry Makes Pitch For Economic Benefit Of Anti-Piracy In Developing Countries
    19/10/2010: Delegates See UN Protocol Against Biopiracy Within Reach
    15/10/2010: As Negotiators Launch Talks On Biodiversity, Industry Requests IP Protection
    13/10/2010: Sign Up For Email Alerts Of IP-Watch Burbles!
    08/10/2010: Inside Views: A Rights-Poor Protocol For Biodiversity Access & Benefit-Sharing
    30/09/2010: WIPO Assembly Considers Paths For Possible New Treaties
    28/09/2010: Burdened With Brackets, Biodiversity ABS Protocol Needs Political Will To Survive
    27/09/2010: The Realities Of Traditional Knowledge And Patents in India
    16/09/2010: Economists Report Empirical Evidence Of TRIPS Impact On Developing Countries
    12/09/2010: African Traditional Knowledge And Folklore Given IP Protection Despite Warning Of TK Commodification
    09/08/2010: Intellectual Property Watch Thanks You For Your Support
    28/07/2010: Reminder: Urgent Call To Support Intellectual Property Watch
    26/07/2010: WIPO Sees First Real Progress In 10 Years On Text For Protection Of Folklore
    20/07/2010: Consensus On Binding Biodiversity Agreement Elusive, To Reconvene in September
    16/07/2010: Hopes Fading For Concluding Biodiversity Access And Benefit Sharing Negotiations?
    09/07/2010: UN Biodiversity Talks Resume, Last Chance For Agreement Before October Deadline
    05/07/2010: Help Intellectual Property Watch!
    11/06/2010: FIFA, Vuvuzelas And Facebook: The Global Trophy Of IP Protection
    01/06/2010: US, China Weaving Closer Trade and IP Cooperation; Focus On Innovation
    12/05/2010: Biotechnology Consultant To Lead WIPO Global Challenges Division
    08/05/2010: WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee Agrees To Intensify Text-Based Negotiations
    07/05/2010: WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee Moving Toward Legal Agreement