SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge

    07/10/2012: WIPO Members (Again) Intensify Talks On Genetic Material, TK, Folklore
    05/10/2012: India Ratifies Nagoya Protocol On Biodiversity Access And Benefit-Sharing
    13/07/2012: WIPO Folklore Talks Headed To Assembly; Treaty Negotiation Unlikely In 2013
    13/07/2012: WIPO Governments Push On New Folklore Treaty Text; Indigenous Peoples Disappointed
    10/07/2012: Traditional Cultural Expressions Talks Back On Track At WIPO
    10/07/2012: New CBD Head: IPR Still Key To Nagoya Protocol On Access And Benefit-Sharing
    09/07/2012: WIPO Folklore Committee Stuck In Starting Blocks; Indigenous Peoples Wave UN Declaration
    06/07/2012: WIPO Committee Makes Last Run At Folklore Treaty Text Before Annual Assembly
    03/07/2012: Nagoya Protocol Access & Benefit-Sharing Meeting Kicks Off In New Delhi
    29/05/2012: Inside Views: Golden Oldies? South African High Court Looks At What Is “Traditional”
    17/05/2012: South Africa Hopes New Bill Brings Traditional Knowledge Protection
    16/05/2012: After Sharp Concerns, Cooperation Prevails On UNCTAD’s Mandate For Next Four Years
    01/05/2012: Lines Of Geographical Indications Debate Begin To Take Shape In The United States
    01/05/2012: Study On Non-Agricultural GIs Supported By European Commission
    21/04/2012: Frustrations Show At Slow Progress On Protection Of Traditional Knowledge at WIPO
    18/04/2012: Divergences Clarified On Protection Of Traditional Knowledge At WIPO
    02/04/2012: Book Details IP Rights And Development
    23/03/2012: New Chair For WTO GI Register Talks Seeks New Ideas
    18/03/2012: Inside Views: A NEW South Africa Traditional Knowledge Bill – Sui Generis Protection for TK
    23/02/2012: WIPO Achieves Single Legal Text On Genetic Resources; Indigenous Peoples Back
    22/02/2012: Indigenous Peoples Walk Out Of WIPO Committee On Genetic Resources
    19/02/2012: WIPO Members Work Through Differences In Genetic Resources Document
    17/02/2012: WIPO Members Begin Work On Single Text On IP And Genetic Resources
    15/02/2012: WIPO Members Aim For Single Text On Genetic Resources Protection
    08/02/2012: In 2012: Are Biotech, Ethics And Biodiversity Friends or Foes?
    30/01/2012: Geographical Indications Register Gains Ground Outside WTO
    03/01/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Posts Of 2011 Tell Story Of International IP Policymaking
    19/12/2011: GIs A Candidate For The Exclusive Club Of Appellations Of Origin At WIPO
    08/11/2011: Inside Views: The Mad Hatter In Wonderland: South Africa’s New TK Bill
    27/10/2011: Revised EPO Patent For Conventional Broccoli Has Public Interest Ramifications
    23/10/2011: WTO IP Committee Addresses Medicines Access, Plain-Packaged Tobacco, ACTA
    20/10/2011: UPOV Sprouts A New Public Face – As Farmers Protest
    14/10/2011: Trading Knowledge As A Public Good: A Proposal For The WTO
    11/10/2011: Unpunished Human Rights Violations Challenge Right To Food, Activists Say
    10/10/2011: With WTO Stalled, GI Industry Proponents Move To Create Their Own Register
    06/10/2011: Inside Views: South Africa: TK Legislation In The New Tradition
    04/10/2011: Nagoya Protocol On Biodiversity Benefit-Sharing Has 64 Signatories
    15/09/2011: Experts Still Divided On Influence Of IP On Biodiversity Conservation
    10/08/2011: UN Highlights IP Rights For Indigenous Peoples’ Day
    22/07/2011: WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee On Way To New Mandate
    22/07/2011: Traditional Knowledge, Folkore Treaty Texts Still Advancing At WIPO
    20/07/2011: Extension Of WIPO Committee On TK, Genetic Resources Appears Likely
    19/07/2011: Kenya Opens Region’s Door To GM Maize
    15/07/2011: Decisive Week Ahead For Protection Of Traditional Knowledge, Genetic Resources
    28/06/2011: WIPO Seminar: IP Is Spearhead Of Agricultural Innovation, Solution To Food Shortage
    24/06/2011: Twelve More Nations, EU, Sign Nagoya Protocol
    16/06/2011: Plain Packaging For Tobacco Raises IPR Questions At WTO
    08/06/2011: Merck Donates Natural Products Library For Research
    06/06/2011: New Fund To Help Ratify And Implement Nagoya Protocol
    14/05/2011: Indigenous Peoples Won’t Be “Wished Away” In Traditional Knowledge Treaty Talks
    Your IP address is 23.22.212.158