Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

The Politicization Of The US Patent System

The Washington Post story, How patent reform’s fraught politics have left USPTO still without a boss (July 30), is a vivid account of how patent reform has divided the US economy, preempting a possible replacement for David Kappos who stepped down 18 months ago. The division is even bigger than portrayed. Universities have lined up en masse to oppose reform, while main street businesses that merely use technology argue for reform. Reminiscent of the partisan divide that has paralyzed US politics, this struggle crosses party lines and extends well beyond the usual inter-industry debates. Framed in terms of combating patent trolls through technical legal fixes, there lurks a broader economic concern – to what extent ordinary retailers, bank, restaurants, local banks, motels, realtors, and travel agents should bear the burden of defending against patents as a cost of doing business.

Latest Comments
  • “We want everybody to agree on the science telling... »
  • So this is how we mankind will become extinct? No ... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    Traditional and Indigenous Knowledge

    17/01/2014: Special Report: Traditional Knowledge And IP: View From The Ground Up
    09/01/2014: Top IP-Watch Stories Of 2013: India, Marrakesh Treaty, Seed/Gene Patents, WIPO Election
    06/01/2014: Global Congress On IP And Public Interest Adopts Principles For Negotiations
    12/12/2013: Convergence Of Who’s Who In IP, Innovation, Public Interest In Africa
    09/12/2013: Revised WIPO Treaty On Appellations Of Origin On Course, Chair Says
    08/12/2013: Cape Town Conference Highlights Innovation, IP And Public Interest
    02/12/2013: Revision Of Lisbon Treaty Seen By Some As Discriminatory To National Systems
    28/11/2013: Critical Moment For Africa’s Small Farmers As ARIPO Decides On Plant Variety Protection
    30/10/2013: Farmers’ Groups Warn ARIPO About Implementing UPOV 91 In Africa
    22/10/2013: UPOV Holds Weeklong Meetings As Civil Society Publishes Restricted Documents
    08/10/2013: Perplexed About International Policy On GR, TK and TCEs? Here’s A Book
    04/10/2013: Nagoya Protocol Halfway To Required Number Of Accessions
    30/09/2013: WIPO Assembly Approves New Work Mandate On GR, TK Protection
    27/09/2013: WIPO Members Reach Tentative Deal On TK Treaties; External Offices Mired
    25/09/2013: Urgent Need To Shift Away From Industrial Agriculture, Says UN Agency
    29/08/2013: Global IP Debate Over Rooibos Intensifies As More Claims Surface
    28/08/2013: WIPO To Hold Teach-In On Value Of IP System To Indigenous Peoples
    23/08/2013: South Africa Moves Toward New IP Policy; Rooibos Industry Seeks Protection
    20/08/2013: Interviews: What Protection Of Traditional Knowledge Means To Indigenous Peoples
    02/08/2013: Reactions To Treaty On Plant Genetic Resources For Food And Agriculture
    25/07/2013: WIPO General Assembly Left To Decide Future Work Of TK Committee
    24/07/2013: WIPO Talks On Future Of TK, Genetic Resources, Folklore Intensify
    23/07/2013: WIPO Committee To Decide Fate Of Treaties To Protect TK, Genetic Resources, Folklore
    22/07/2013: Report Seeks To Advance Discussions On Shared Traditional Knowledge
    18/07/2013: WIPO Folklore Talks Stalling; Work Continues On New Draft Text
    17/07/2013: WIPO Surveys Members On Its Services Provided To Traditional Knowledge Committee
    17/07/2013: QUNO: Don’t Forget Small Farmers In WIPO GR Negotiations
    15/07/2013: WIPO Members Back In Negotiations On Protection Of Traditional Cultural Expressions
    15/07/2013: WIPO Scrounges For Funds For Indigenous Participants In Key Treaty Negotiations
    03/07/2013: Questions Arise Over EU Draft Regulation To Implement Nagoya Protocol
    21/06/2013: Harvard Professor A Flag Bearer For Agricultural Innovation, Biotechnologies In Africa
    04/06/2013: Protection Of Local GI Products Can Benefit Women, Speakers Say
    29/05/2013: Food Culture Clash: EU, US Conflicting Concepts For GIs; Both Covet Asian Market
    28/05/2013: GIs The “Darling” of Europe, But Protection A Challenge For All, Producers Say
    24/05/2013: GI Proponents Assess Progress, Challenges; French Minister Blasts Large-Scale Agriculture
    10/05/2013: South Africa To Launch National Traditional Knowledge Recording System
    03/05/2013: GIs Closer To International Status As WIPO Committee Recommends Treaty Negotiation
    02/05/2013: GIs Rub Against Trademark Protection In WIPO Discussions On Protection
    30/04/2013: UNCTAD Handbook: IP And The CBD Protocol On Genetic Resources
    29/04/2013: UNCTAD: IPRs In Health, Research, Cosmetics, Meet Access & Benefit Sharing
    28/04/2013: New WIPO Text On Traditional Knowledge Protection Cleaner But Issues Remain
    27/04/2013: Industry List Of Potential US GIs Released Ahead Of WIPO Meeting
    26/04/2013: In “Great Shame,” WIPO Fund For Indigenous Peoples’ Participation Running Dry
    24/04/2013: WIPO Committee Issues Revised Text On Traditional Knowledge Protection
    22/04/2013: Protecting Traditional Knowledge: WIPO Members Back To The Drafting Table
    10/04/2013: New Draft Traditional Knowledge Bill Published In South Africa
    09/04/2013: WIPO Hails India’s Accession To Trademark System; India Advocates Balance
    05/04/2013: African Regional Plant Variety Protection Draft Legislation Raises Protest
    04/04/2013: Linguistic Diversity Essential For Innovation, Development, Roundtable Speakers Say
    01/04/2013: GI Experts Speak Of Value But Concede International Accord Hard To Reach
    Your IP address is