SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Lobbying

    05/12/2012: Libraries, NGOs Warn EU Commissioners Against Restrictive Copyright Licensing
    03/12/2012: Industry Groups Urge European Commission To Back Strong Copyright In Upcoming Debate
    03/12/2012: US Isolated In Opposition To WIPO Treaty For The Blind, Group Says
    22/11/2012: NGO Views On WIPO Treaty For Blind Reveal Difficulty In Reaching Accord
    19/11/2012: WHO Denies Industry Money Unduly Influencing Noncommunicable Disease Fight
    09/11/2012: Study Shows Drug Patents Can Be Extended For Decades
    07/11/2012: Could US Election Result Reverse Ever-Stronger Copyright Protection?
    07/11/2012: Film Industry Praises Obama’s “Understanding” Of IP’s Importance
    03/11/2012: Top-Level Domain .Africa Becomes Object Of Bitter Fight
    01/11/2012: Pharma Outlook: Don’t Yield On IP, Work On Trust-Building, Call For Global Cooperation
    23/10/2012: Horticultural Breeders Call For Stronger Protection Of Innovations
    22/10/2012: Greens Call For ‘Social Contract For Digital Age’; Lessig Calls US Hopeless On Copyright Reform
    22/10/2012: Peace, Love, and Private Practice: Film Industry Lawyer Ted Shapiro To Depart MPA
    18/10/2012: Pro-Music Re-Launched After Nine Years
    15/10/2012: EU Rights Owners Blast ICT Industry For Trying To “Hijack” Copyright Levy System Talks
    15/10/2012: Civil Society Network Issues Proposals On Climate Change And IPRs
    15/10/2012: Panellists: Global Health Justice Needs Government Commitment, New Innovation Models
    04/10/2012: Delay Of Pirate Parties’ WIPO Observer Status Raises Questions
    02/10/2012: MSF Launches Patent Opposition Database
    01/10/2012: On TPP Secrecy, US And Five Others Decline To Answer UN
    21/09/2012: Copyright Industry Hard-Hitter Fritz Attaway Retires
    12/09/2012: IFPMA Report, Panel, Examine Rise Of Industry Global Health Partnerships
    06/09/2012: US Congressional Push For Release Of TPP Text; US Pressuring Nations Bilaterally?
    04/09/2012: US Film Industry (Also) Likes Democrats’ Platform On IP And Internet Freedom
    30/08/2012: US Film Industry Praises Republicans On IP And Internet Freedom
    29/08/2012: Revolving Door: US Copyright General Counsel Joins Music Industry
    20/08/2012: Health Advocates Eye Proposed Changes To Patent Law In South Africa
    03/08/2012: Divergent Approaches To Copyright Reform Emerge In Europe
    31/07/2012: US Industry IP Campaign Aims To Dispel Misconceptions About Commercial Interests
    04/07/2012: European Parliament Rejection Puts ACTA Future In Doubt
    03/07/2012: EU Trade Commissioner Makes Last Appeal For Delay Of ACTA Vote
    27/06/2012: People: Keeping Pace With The IP Crowd’s Latest Moves
    21/06/2012: BIO Releases Consultant Report Promoting IP Rights
    30/05/2012: Governments, WHO, Reveal Industry’s Back-Channel Battle Against Tobacco Legislation
    18/05/2012: US Legal Academics Call For Congressional Review Of ACTA
    11/05/2012: DNDi Backs WHO ‘Neglected Patients’ R&D Treaty
    11/05/2012: ICANN IP Advisory Group: Whois, Dot-Brands, Contracts Key Sticking Points In New Domains
    10/05/2012: Inside Views: Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation
    08/05/2012: INTA: Corporate Call To Action On New Domains, Social Media, Counterfeiting
    01/05/2012: Music Industry Groups Await Judgment On Breakthrough Royalty Agreement
    01/05/2012: Lines Of Geographical Indications Debate Begin To Take Shape In The United States
    26/04/2012: Day Marked By Initiatives On The Benefits Of IP, Open Technology
    23/04/2012: “Entrenched Anti-Consumer Bias” Found In Copyright Laws; Creators Launch Petition For Better Contracts
    04/04/2012: Group Says Industry, EPO Finding Loopholes To Patent Seeds, Plants
    22/03/2012: WHO Head Urges Global Support For Australia In Fight Against Tobacco
    20/03/2012: French IP Lawyers Prefer No Favours For Green Tech Patents; Welcome America Invents Act
    19/03/2012: Debate Heats Up Ahead Of EU Parliament Discussion On ACTA
    19/03/2012: US Group Creates Social Platform To Lobby For And Create Internet Reforms
    16/03/2012: Global Business Stands Up For Multilateral Trade At WTO
    15/03/2012: Take The Brussels University Survey On Beliefs About IP
    Your IP address is 50.17.109.248