SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Lobbying

    15/05/2013: Industry Report Calls For Fight Against Counterfeits In Free Trade Zones
    03/05/2013: Petition Fights Proposal For Digital Rights Management In Internet Core
    03/05/2013: Shippers Becoming Anti-Counterfeiting Target; Europe Takes Other Measures
    27/04/2013: Industry List Of Potential US GIs Released Ahead Of WIPO Meeting
    20/04/2013: In UN Talks On Treaty For The Blind, Concern About Heavy Focus On Rightholders’ Interests
    10/04/2013: Study: Misuse Of Patent System Affecting Health System In Australia
    09/04/2013: Brand Owners Seek Their Own ICANN Constituency Group
    05/04/2013: North American Universities Seen Failing To Promote Socially Responsible Licensing
    05/04/2013: African Regional Plant Variety Protection Draft Legislation Raises Protest
    28/03/2013: Report Analyses Fast-Track Green Patent Applications
    28/03/2013: Royalty-Setting For Standard Essential Patents Might Be Balanced By Prospect Of Injunction, Speakers Say
    27/03/2013: Biovision: Personalised Medicine, Climate Change, Sustainability Need Innovation
    27/03/2013: Former US Congressman Howard Berman Joins Lobbying Firm
    25/03/2013: UPOV 1991 Will Adversely Impact Farmers In Tanzania, Civil Society And Farmers Say
    25/03/2013: Diverging Views On IPR Protection Needs In Africa Emerge At IP Workshop
    21/03/2013: Global Pharma Companies See Battle For Survival In Pakistan
    20/03/2013: At US-Led Workshop, African Stakeholders Call For “Home Grown IP Agenda”
    18/03/2013: Nearly 50 Groups Demand IPRs Out Of EU-US FTA
    18/03/2013: Practitioners Discuss Interconnection Between Professional Sports And IP
    13/03/2013: On Plant Patents, EPO President Backs Industry, Disregards EU Parliament, Group Says
    12/03/2013: Leaked IP Chapter Of India-EU FTA Shows TRIPS-Plus Pitfalls For India, Expert Says
    12/03/2013: World Congress Hosts 5th Annual Corporate IP Counsel Forum
    11/03/2013: Digital Rights, Health Concerns As TPP Talks Continue
    06/03/2013: WTO: Wide Support For LDC TRIPS Extension, With A Hitch
    06/03/2013: US Report: Foreign-Owned Firms Dominate IP Industries
    05/03/2013: Monsanto v. Bowman: Stocktaking After Supreme Court Hearings
    28/02/2013: Coalition Asks US Congress For Action On “Patent Trolls”
    27/02/2013: European Copyright Reform On Slow Track, Observers Say
    27/02/2013: Recording Industry Sees New “Buzz” From Digital Revenues
    26/02/2013: Obama Administration Announces New Open Access Policy
    21/02/2013: Google’s Anti-Piracy Measures Not Enough, Recording Industry Says
    21/02/2013: WIPO Treaty For The Blind: Rightsholders Seek Safeguards, Civil Society Seeks Real Access
    16/02/2013: Indian Users’ Perspective On WIPO Negotiations On Treaty For Visually Impaired
    13/02/2013: Event Explains Partnerships In Natural Products Research Through Thai Experience With Novartis
    12/02/2013: Letter Shows US Pressure On Global Fund For Compulsory Licensing, Generics
    11/02/2013: Report Proposes Solutions To Address Noncommunicable Diseases
    08/02/2013: Genetic Origin In Food And Agriculture Difficult To Identify, Say Seed Treaty Officials
    07/02/2013: People: Tracking IP Influencers’ Latest Moves
    27/01/2013: Tech Industry Report Finds Entertainment Industry Thriving Despite Complaints
    23/01/2013: IP Professionals Discuss Tech Transfer Potential In Humanitarian Business At WIPO
    18/01/2013: US FTC Finds Sharp Rise In ‘Pay-For-Delay’ Deals Blocking Generics
    17/01/2013: The Big Shift: A Look At Key Issues In International Copyright In 2013
    16/01/2013: Free Drugs Are “Crucial Part” Of Neglected Tropical Disease Fight
    16/01/2013: Business’ Privileged Access To EU-India Trade Documents
    09/01/2013: IP-Watch Looks At The Year Ahead In International IP Policy
    17/12/2012: US Chamber Holds Annual IP Attaché Roundtable, Announces New “IP Index”
    16/12/2012: WIPO Visually Impaired Treaty: Voices From Africa On Dire Situation
    16/12/2012: Publishers Seek Support For Their Approach To WIPO Treaty
    16/12/2012: US IP Officials Blast NGOs In Geneva
    13/12/2012: Waiting For Customs And Trademark Reforms, EU Rights Owners Get “Proactive” Against Fakes
    Your IP address is 79.171.81.118