Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Interns Summer 2013

IP-Watch interns Brittany Ngo (Yale Graduate School of Public Health) and Caitlin McGivern (University of Law, London) talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Quantitative Analysis Of Contributions To NETMundial Meeting

A quantitative analysis of the 187 submissions to the April NETmundial conference on the future of internet governance shows broad support for improving security, ensuring respect for privacy, ensuring freedom of expression, and globalizing the IANA function, analyst Richard Hill writes.

Latest Comments
  • If this goes ahead, as the EU will "speak" for all... »
  • Neutral ground? Well, if there is adequate recogni... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    IP Law

    17/07/2013: People: Transitions In The Global IP Community
    16/07/2013: Church Leaders, Gun Groups Sue NSA Over ‘Unconstitutional’ Phone Surveillance
    15/07/2013: Inside Views: Micro Entity Status For Universities And AIA Rulemaking On Power Of Attorney
    11/07/2013: EU High Court Upholds Private Copy Levies On First Sale Of Blank Media
    04/07/2013: Inside Views: Happy Birthday To You, Copyrighted
    03/07/2013: Public Interest Groups Ask US Court To Invalidate Stem Cell Patent
    27/06/2013: Copyright Levies Can Be Imposed On Sale Of Printers, Computers, EU High Court Rules
    19/06/2013: European Commission Fines Pharma Companies For Payments To Delay Generic Entry
    17/06/2013: US Supreme Court Rules On Pharma Payments To Delay Generic Drugs On Market
    17/06/2013: US Supreme Court Restricts Gene Patents … A Little
    17/06/2013: Infojustice: The Topsy-Turvy US International Trade Commission
    17/06/2013: Infojustice: A Bumpy Road To Net Neutrality In Brazil
    14/06/2013: Myriad Case Decided: Natural Human Genes Not Patentable In US
    14/06/2013: Poland’s Minister Of Culture Calls For Intellectu​al Property Courts
    04/06/2013: White House Takes Major Action Against “Patent Trolls”
    13/05/2013: US Supreme Court Rules In Favour Of Monsanto In Patent Exhaustion Case
    07/05/2013: Viewing Cached Copyrighted Content Isn’t Infringing, UK Supreme Court Says
    29/04/2013: IP-Watch Readers Save $200 On LES Spring Meeting, 14-16 May In Seattle
    23/04/2013: US Supreme Court May Invalidate Gene Patents, But Create Little Change
    15/04/2013: Inside Views: The Novartis Decision: A Tale Of Developing Countries, IP, And The Role Of The Judiciary
    12/04/2013: EU General Court Clears Copyright Collecting Societies Of Antitrust Charges
    11/04/2013: Community Right To Access Unpublished Works Trumps Moral Rights Of Heir, Argentine Court Says
    04/04/2013: Inside Views: The Judgment In Novartis v. India: What The Supreme Court Of India Said
    01/04/2013: Novartis Loses Patent Bid: Lessons From India’s 3(d) Experience
    01/04/2013: US Court Rules TV Streaming Service Does Not Violate Copyright Law
    01/04/2013: India Dismisses Antitrust Complaint Against Gilead Sciences
    28/03/2013: WIPO Reports Another Record In Cybersquatting Disputes In 2012
    28/03/2013: European Commission Eyes Modernisation Of EU Trademark System
    28/03/2013: Royalty-Setting For Standard Essential Patents Might Be Balanced By Prospect Of Injunction, Speakers Say
    27/03/2013: Former US Congressman Howard Berman Joins Lobbying Firm
    27/03/2013: Inside Views: Why So Many Patent Filings Were Filed In The US On Or Before 15 March 2013
    26/03/2013: United States Chided As TRIPS Scofflaw At WTO
    22/03/2013: Conference Addresses Current Issues For Corporate IP Counsel
    19/03/2013: Samsung Lawyer Assesses IP Legal Battle With Apple
    13/03/2013: Pirate Bay Loses Its Appeal To European Court Of Human Rights
    06/03/2013: Intellectual Ventures Reaches Another Semiconductor Patent Settlement
    05/03/2013: “Works For Hire” A Key Issue As Music Stars Begin Terminating Copyright Transfers
    05/03/2013: Monsanto v. Bowman: Stocktaking After Supreme Court Hearings
    05/03/2013: Bayer Will Appeal India Compulsory Licence On Its Cancer Drug
    04/03/2013: India’s First Compulsory Licence Upheld, But Legal Fights Likely To Continue
    01/03/2013: WIPO Patent Law Committee Cinches Agreement On Future Work
    01/03/2013: Russia Establishes Specialised Court For Intellectual Property Rights
    27/02/2013: Change to UK Patents Act Removes Infringement For Use Of Clinical Trial Data
    19/02/2013: 24 EU Members Sign Unified Patent Court Agreement
    18/02/2013: Monsanto, Myriad: Two US Legal Cases Shaking Biotech Industries
    14/02/2013: EU Unitary Patent And Court Are Here. Or Are They?
    13/02/2013: USPTO Finalises Rules For ‘First-Inventor-To-File’ System Switch
    12/02/2013: Intellectual Ventures Sues Internet Providers For DSL Patent Infringement
    08/02/2013: US Justice Department Reaches Settlement In E-Books Case
    08/02/2013: New Textbook On Copyright Law For Librarians
    Your IP address is