SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    IP Law

    27/11/2012: Event This Week: The Creation Of Unitary Patent Protection In The European Union
    21/11/2012: Overseas Manufacturing Creates Copyright Dilemma For US Supreme Court
    20/11/2012: EU Patent, Patent Court Could Finally Be Approved In Coming Weeks
    14/11/2012: Analysis: Argentine Court Clarifies What Patent Holders Can – And Cannot – Prohibit
    04/11/2012: Landmark India IP Board Decision Against Hepatitis C Drug Patent
    19/10/2012: US Court Rules On Fair Use For Blind Users, Digitisation, Amid Treaty Talks
    18/10/2012: New USPTO Post-Grant Review A Small Step For Patent Harmonisation
    17/10/2012: WIPO Holds Annual Arbitration Workshop Off-Site For First Time
    12/10/2012: Russian Social Network vKontakte Held Liable For Copyright Infringement A Second Time
    10/10/2012: Talks Ongoing To Raise Quality Of International Patents
    05/10/2012: Google, Publishers Reach Digital Library Settlement
    02/10/2012: MSF Launches Patent Opposition Database
    28/09/2012: WTO Dispute Panel Formed On Australia Tobacco Law
    28/09/2012: Latest Draft Of European Patent Court Agreement Released
    27/09/2012: Google’s Neutrality Stance Tested Yet Again In Brazil
    25/09/2012: Special Report: Licensing Of News Titles And Extracts – Newspapers’ Best And Last Bet?
    21/09/2012: Copyright Industry Hard-Hitter Fritz Attaway Retires
    21/09/2012: Inside Views: Medals, Models And Moguls
    21/09/2012: Opposing Views: The Impact Of Canada’s Access Copyright Decision
    20/09/2012: A Brief Look At Botswana’s New IP Law
    20/09/2012: US And UN Consider New Limits On Patent Wars
    19/09/2012: Inside Views: Patently Wrong – The Jury’s Verdict In Apple v. Samsung
    18/09/2012: India: Balancing Public And Private Interests In The Intellectual Property Regime
    13/09/2012: America Invents Act: Another Piece Of Patent Reform Puzzle Falls Into Place
    29/08/2012: Public Library Must Provide Accessible E-Readers Under US Law
    17/08/2012: Isolated DNA Declared Patentable By US Court Of Appeals
    07/08/2012: A Look At India’s Key Pharmaceutical Patent Case
    06/08/2012: Inside Views: Form Over Function – The ECJ Rules On Software Copyright
    27/07/2012: Innovation And The Law: Some Lessons From The Patent Wars
    22/07/2012: © 1912-2012. A Century of Dutch Copyright Law
    12/07/2012: Special Report: Russia Amends IP Law In Advance Of WTO Accession
    06/07/2012: Novartis’ Indian Patent Law Challenge Postponed Again
    06/07/2012: ITU To Hold High-Level Talks On “Innovation-Stifling, Rampant” Patent Litigation
    29/06/2012: Europe Reaches Agreement On Unitary Patent
    27/06/2012: People: Keeping Pace With The IP Crowd’s Latest Moves
    25/06/2012: A Bigger, Meaner Patent War
    20/06/2012: Inside Views: An Anthem To Ignorance: South Africa’s Case Of Nkosi Sikelel’ iAfrika
    19/06/2012: IP Owners Join USPTO: Copying For Patent Applications Is Fair Use
    13/06/2012: Plant Patentability Questions Deepen In EPO Tomato Patent Case
    11/06/2012: Promotion: Upcoming Courses And Events Provide Insights Into IP
    30/05/2012: Russia’s Largest Social Network vKontakte Held Liable For Copyright Infringement
    24/05/2012: US, China To Hold Landmark Intellectual Property Adjudication Meeting
    24/05/2012: Group Looks At Effects Of America Invents Act On Plant Breeders
    22/05/2012: WIPO Committee On Law Of Patents Walks A Fine Line
    20/05/2012: India’s Generics-Big Pharma Battle Drops Drug Prices, Raises Legal Debate
    18/05/2012: US Legal Academics Call For Congressional Review Of ACTA
    14/05/2012: EU Court Of Justice Upholds Limits Of Copyright On Software
    03/05/2012: Viacom v. YouTube: Chipping Away At The DMCA
    01/05/2012: Lines Of Geographical Indications Debate Begin To Take Shape In The United States
    23/04/2012: Text Of Kenya Judgment On Anti-Counterfeiting Now Available
    Your IP address is 50.19.155.235