SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • This is a good summary, except just to clarify one... »
  • Ellen 't Hoen will be a hard act to follow. She p... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    IP Law

    20/05/2012: India’s Generics-Big Pharma Battle Drops Drug Prices, Raises Legal Debate
    18/05/2012: US Legal Academics Call For Congressional Review Of ACTA
    14/05/2012: EU Court Of Justice Upholds Limits Of Copyright On Software
    03/05/2012: Viacom v. YouTube: Chipping Away At The DMCA
    01/05/2012: Lines Of Geographical Indications Debate Begin To Take Shape In The United States
    23/04/2012: Text Of Kenya Judgment On Anti-Counterfeiting Now Available
    21/04/2012: Kenyan High Court’s Overturning Of Anti-Counterfeit Law Hailed
    13/04/2012: US Supreme Court Edges Toward Reviewing Extent Of GMO Patents
    05/04/2012: Court Issues Decision On Intermediary Liability In Viacom v. YouTube
    05/04/2012: After Mayo, Is Patent Law More Restrictive In US Than Europe?
    04/04/2012: ‘Counterfeit’ Dropped From New WHO Protocol On Illicit Tobacco Trade
    28/03/2012: Novartis India Challenge Postponed To July
    27/03/2012: US Supreme Court Reverses Myriad Decision Allowing Gene Patents
    21/03/2012: US Supreme Court Narrows Patentable Subject Matter
    20/03/2012: French IP Lawyers Prefer No Favours For Green Tech Patents; Welcome America Invents Act
    15/03/2012: More Foreigners Find Themselves Targets Of US Copyright Law
    14/03/2012: Ukraine WTO Trademark Dispute Vs. Australia Tests Public Health Measures
    12/03/2012: India Grants First Compulsory Licence, For Bayer Cancer Drug
    08/03/2012: European High Court Hears Case With Impact On Buying Software Online
    07/03/2012: A High-Level Collegium Calls For New Global Governance
    07/03/2012: Berlin Court Rules Facebook Violates User Rights
    02/03/2012: Novartis Before India’s Supreme Court: What’s Really At Stake?
    27/02/2012: Inside Views: ‘Balanced’ Copyright: Not A Magic Solving Word
    31/01/2012: European Commission Orders Italy To Drop Patent Linkage Delaying Generics
    21/01/2012: US Cracks Down On Download Sites In Midst Of Anti-Piracy Debate
    19/01/2012: Book On “Idea Rights” Gives Clear, “Non-Ownership” Explanation Of IP Law
    18/01/2012: US Supreme Court Rules On Golan v. Holder, Key Public Domain Case
    13/01/2012: The Year Ahead 2012: Top IP Legal Issues In The United States
    03/01/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Posts Of 2011 Tell Story Of International IP Policymaking
    22/12/2011: EU Patent Advances: Parliament Could Vote In February, Court Location Still Up In Air
    12/12/2011: Inside Views: Brazil’s Leaked Copyright Reform Draft Bill Shows Latest Thinking
    08/12/2011: Patent Reform Has USPTO’s Trial And Appeal Board At The ‘Centre Of A Storm’
    06/12/2011: Inside Views: A Clatch Of Copyright Cases At The Supreme Court of Canada
    01/12/2011: Philippines: IP Office Cannot Issue Injunctions On Counterfeit Claims
    30/11/2011: India: Novartis Hearing Postponed To February
    25/11/2011: European Court Of Justice Rules Out Mandatory Filtering Systems At Intermediaries
    14/11/2011: Inside Views: Post-Grant Oppositions Under US Patent Reform
    02/11/2011: USPTO, Small Businesses Talk Patent Reform, Harmonisation, Fee Diversion
    28/10/2011: Multiple Defendants In Patent Infringement Filing Under New US Law
    27/10/2011: Revised EPO Patent For Conventional Broccoli Has Public Interest Ramifications
    21/10/2011: Inside Views: How To Respond To A Cease & Desist Letter
    18/10/2011: EU High Court Bans Patents On Human Embryo Stem Cells For Commerce
    18/10/2011: Inside Views: To Stem Infringement, Block Money – Not Information
    12/10/2011: US Senator Questions Constitutionality Of ACTA
    10/10/2011: German Police Used Trojan Horses In Investigations
    06/10/2011: ECJ Decision On Exclusive Broadcasting Licences Could Reach Beyond Sports
    16/09/2011: US Patent Reform Signed Into Law
    12/09/2011: EU Extends Copyright Protection From 50 To 70 Years
    09/09/2011: Patent Reform Passes US Senate, Makes History; Obama to Sign: IP-Watch Analysis Shows Who Wins
    07/09/2011: Senate Takes Up Patent Reform; Chairman Vows To Fight Amendments