SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting

    06/03/2013: Intellectual Ventures Reaches Another Semiconductor Patent Settlement
    05/03/2013: “Works For Hire” A Key Issue As Music Stars Begin Terminating Copyright Transfers
    04/03/2013: Inside Views: Should Industry Support LDCs’ Request For Unlimited Time To Implement The TRIPS Agreement? Absolutely
    27/02/2013: European Copyright Reform On Slow Track, Observers Say
    27/02/2013: Recording Industry Sees New “Buzz” From Digital Revenues
    26/02/2013: ITU Sees Busy Year Ahead, Hopes To Overcome Divisions
    26/02/2013: Obama Administration Announces New Open Access Policy
    25/02/2013: Web-Based IP Assessment Tool Gets Update From USPTO
    23/02/2013: WIPO Blind Treaty Text Shapes Up On Last Day; More Drafting In April
    21/02/2013: Google’s Anti-Piracy Measures Not Enough, Recording Industry Says
    20/02/2013: Blind Treaty Discussions Could Wander, All Sides Ask For Focus
    19/02/2013: Closed Discussions At WIPO On Treaty For Blind, As New Text Emerges
    16/02/2013: Indian Users’ Perspective On WIPO Negotiations On Treaty For Visually Impaired
    15/02/2013: Obama Takes Swipe At Patent Trolls In Call For Further Reform
    15/02/2013: WIPO Delegates To Clean Text Of Blind Treaty Before Diplomatic Conference In June
    12/02/2013: Report Finds Average US Patent Cost US$ 374,000 In 2012
    12/02/2013: Intellectual Ventures Sues Internet Providers For DSL Patent Infringement
    08/02/2013: US Justice Department Reaches Settlement In E-Books Case
    08/02/2013: New Textbook On Copyright Law For Librarians
    08/02/2013: Fate Of Google Book Search Still To Come, Expert Says
    05/02/2013: European Commission Launches Copyright Licensing Initiative
    04/02/2013: Upcoming Law Summit To Address IP Management, Enforcement
    31/01/2013: Mediator’s Report On EU Copyright Levies Recommends Major Changes
    31/01/2013: EU Proposes Comprehensive Reform Of Data Protection (Video)
    23/01/2013: Google Report Shows Steady Rise In Government Surveillance
    23/01/2013: Philippines Mulls Suspended Cybercrime Law Restricting Communication
    22/01/2013: Inside Views: Development In Indian IP Law: The Copyright (Amendment) Act 2012
    17/01/2013: The Big Shift: A Look At Key Issues In International Copyright In 2013
    17/01/2013: US Senate Judiciary Committee 2013 Agenda Includes Privacy, Press Freedom
    15/01/2013: Company Takes A Fair Shot At Facebook, LinkedIn, With Social Networking Patents
    11/01/2013: UNITAID Wins Rights To Internet Domain Names
    10/01/2013: Reform Of EU Data Protection – Largest EU Lobbying Campaign Ever?
    09/01/2013: IP-Watch Looks At The Year Ahead In International IP Policy
    02/01/2013: Inside Views: Collaborative Capacity Building In Intellectual Property — Leveraging On African Diaspora Exchange
    21/12/2012: UN Official Stresses Importance Of Civil Society In Internet Future
    17/12/2012: WIPO Members En Route To Diplomatic Conference On Treaty For The Blind
    16/12/2012: WIPO Visually Impaired Treaty: Voices From Africa On Dire Situation
    16/12/2012: Great Expectations For WIPO Extraordinary General Assembly On Treaty For Blind
    13/12/2012: WCIT Split After Split “Vote” On Internet Governance Resolution
    12/12/2012: WIPO Promotes Discussion On Indian Film Industry’s Benefit From IPR
    12/12/2012: WCIT: Internet Issues Still In Draft New Telecom Rules
    09/12/2012: A Week Into WCIT, Few Compromises In Fragile Discussions
    06/12/2012: European Commission Embarks On Process To ‘Modernise’ Copyright
    05/12/2012: Libraries, NGOs Warn EU Commissioners Against Restrictive Copyright Licensing
    04/12/2012: World Conference On International Telecom Kicks Off In Political Style
    03/12/2012: US Isolated In Opposition To WIPO Treaty For The Blind, Group Says
    03/12/2012: Special Report On Russia: Enforcement Against Online Copyright Infringement
    30/11/2012: ITU’s Touré Urges Syria To Restore Internet Access
    29/11/2012: US Ambassador On WCIT: “ITU Is Not The Problem”
    28/11/2012: Reshaping The International Copyright System To Facilitate Education In Developing Countries
    Your IP address is 184.72.91.94