SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Human Rights

    21/02/2013: WIPO Negotiations: Latest Text Of Treaty For The Blind Is Short On Progress
    20/02/2013: Blind Treaty Discussions Could Wander, All Sides Ask For Focus
    19/02/2013: Closed Discussions At WIPO On Treaty For Blind, As New Text Emerges
    16/02/2013: Indian Users’ Perspective On WIPO Negotiations On Treaty For Visually Impaired
    15/02/2013: WIPO Delegates To Clean Text Of Blind Treaty Before Diplomatic Conference In June
    12/02/2013: Letter Shows US Pressure On Global Fund For Compulsory Licensing, Generics
    08/02/2013: Genetic Origin In Food And Agriculture Difficult To Identify, Say Seed Treaty Officials
    05/02/2013: Indigenous Peoples Rights’ Reaffirmed By UN Rapporteur, Panellists, At WIPO
    04/02/2013: Plant Variety Protection Meets Resistance in Developing Countries; Consultations Coming
    03/02/2013: Polio Talks At WHO Board: Between Progress Made, The Final Push And The Role Of Partnership
    01/02/2013: Inside Views — Genetic Resources And Traditional Knowledge : Getting The Rules Right For Agriculture: A Key Challenge For WIPO’s IGC
    29/01/2013: Inside Views: Potential Elements Of The WHO Global R&D Treaty: Tailoring Solutions For Disparate Contexts
    25/01/2013: Governments Put WHO’s Independence At Heart Of Reform Debate
    23/01/2013: Google Report Shows Steady Rise In Government Surveillance
    23/01/2013: Philippines Mulls Suspended Cybercrime Law Restricting Communication
    22/01/2013: 2013: India Battles For Right To Use Compulsory Licences To Make Medicines Affordable
    18/01/2013: US FTC Finds Sharp Rise In ‘Pay-For-Delay’ Deals Blocking Generics
    17/01/2013: US Senate Judiciary Committee 2013 Agenda Includes Privacy, Press Freedom
    16/01/2013: Free Drugs Are “Crucial Part” Of Neglected Tropical Disease Fight
    16/01/2013: Business’ Privileged Access To EU-India Trade Documents
    09/01/2013: IP-Watch Looks At The Year Ahead In International IP Policy
    21/12/2012: US Supreme Court Poised To Rule Human Genes Are Not Patentable
    21/12/2012: UN Official Stresses Importance Of Civil Society In Internet Future
    20/12/2012: European Human Rights Court: Internet Restriction Violates Freedom Of Expression
    19/12/2012: WIPO Treaty For Blind Negotiation Set For Mid-June In Marrakesh
    18/12/2012: WIPO To Negotiate Treaty For The Blind In June; ‘Still Some Distance To Travel’
    17/12/2012: WIPO Members En Route To Diplomatic Conference On Treaty For The Blind
    16/12/2012: WIPO Visually Impaired Treaty: Voices From Africa On Dire Situation
    16/12/2012: Publishers Seek Support For Their Approach To WIPO Treaty
    16/12/2012: Great Expectations For WIPO Extraordinary General Assembly On Treaty For Blind
    03/12/2012: US Isolated In Opposition To WIPO Treaty For The Blind, Group Says
    30/11/2012: ITU’s Touré Urges Syria To Restore Internet Access
    29/11/2012: WHO Members Agree On “Strategic Work Plan” On Health R&D – But No Convention
    29/11/2012: WHO Negotiations To Address Medical R&D Global Gaps Head Deep Into Night
    28/11/2012: Reshaping The International Copyright System To Facilitate Education In Developing Countries
    28/11/2012: Fast-Tracking Green Patents Reduces Wait Time, Appeals To Start-Ups, Study Finds
    28/11/2012: International Instrument On Medical R&D Still On Negotiating Table At WHO
    27/11/2012: Special Report: With Poor And Uninsured A Majority, Southeast Asia Sees Rise In Generics
    25/11/2012: WHO Members Meet This Week To Address Global Gaps In Medical R&D
    24/11/2012: WIPO Committee Finishes A Step Closer To Treaty For Visually Impaired
    22/11/2012: NGO Views On WIPO Treaty For Blind Reveal Difficulty In Reaching Accord
    22/11/2012: Latest Text Of Treaty For Visually Impaired Shows More Work Needed
    21/11/2012: In Final Stretch Of Drafting Of WIPO Treaty For The Blind, Tensions High
    20/11/2012: WTO Dispute Body Hears Sides On Australia Tobacco Law
    20/11/2012: Treaty For Visually Impaired Advancing At WIPO; Countries Ask For More Transparency
    19/11/2012: WIPO Director Pleads With Countries To Advance Treaty For Visually Impaired
    19/11/2012: Post-Baku, Pre-WCIT Special Report: Internet Governance On A Shoestring
    18/11/2012: Inside Views: Fixing Canada’s Access to Medicines Regime — Bill C-398
    16/11/2012: Study: UN Development Needs Reform; US, Indian Ambassadors Agree
    15/11/2012: Pending Decision On GM Maize In Mexico Under Fire
    Your IP address is 54.234.67.55