SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Human Rights

    15/05/2013: WHO Stats Show Medicines Remain Out Of Reach Of Poorest Patients
    13/05/2013: US Supreme Court Rules In Favour Of Monsanto In Patent Exhaustion Case
    13/05/2013: How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements
    10/05/2013: South Africa To Launch National Traditional Knowledge Recording System
    08/05/2013: A Battle For Open Public Data In South Africa
    07/05/2013: Viewing Cached Copyrighted Content Isn’t Infringing, UK Supreme Court Says
    06/05/2013: Cuba Files WTO Dispute Against Australia Over Tobacco Plain-Packaging
    03/05/2013: Petition Fights Proposal For Digital Rights Management In Internet Core
    01/05/2013: Experts Offer Perspectives On R&D Policies In The Public Health Domain
    26/04/2013: European Parliament Trade Committee Backs Cultural Exclusion From EU-US FTA
    26/04/2013: In “Great Shame,” WIPO Fund For Indigenous Peoples’ Participation Running Dry
    24/04/2013: WIPO Committee Issues Revised Text On Traditional Knowledge Protection
    23/04/2013: US Supreme Court May Invalidate Gene Patents, But Create Little Change
    22/04/2013: Protecting Traditional Knowledge: WIPO Members Back To The Drafting Table
    22/04/2013: Curbing Vaccine Costs Key To Extending Global Immunisation Reach
    22/04/2013: Mixed Reactions Among Participants In WIPO Talks On Treaty For The Blind
    22/04/2013: WIPO Members Send Draft Treaty For The Blind To Marrakesh
    20/04/2013: In UN Talks On Treaty For The Blind, Concern About Heavy Focus On Rightholders’ Interests
    19/04/2013: Time Ticking For WIPO Delegates On Copyright Exceptions Treaty
    17/04/2013: Last Drafting Effort On WIPO Treaty For The Blind Before Diplomatic Conference
    12/04/2013: EU General Court Clears Copyright Collecting Societies Of Antitrust Charges
    11/04/2013: Community Right To Access Unpublished Works Trumps Moral Rights Of Heir, Argentine Court Says
    05/04/2013: North American Universities Seen Failing To Promote Socially Responsible Licensing
    05/04/2013: African Regional Plant Variety Protection Draft Legislation Raises Protest
    04/04/2013: Linguistic Diversity Essential For Innovation, Development, Roundtable Speakers Say
    01/04/2013: Novartis Loses Patent Bid: Lessons From India’s 3(d) Experience
    25/03/2013: UPOV 1991 Will Adversely Impact Farmers In Tanzania, Civil Society And Farmers Say
    25/03/2013: Inside Views: South Africa: Trampling Tradition – A Call For Support
    23/03/2013: US Supreme Court To Hear Arguments On Pay-For-Delay Drug Deals
    21/03/2013: European Commission VP Kroes Urges Open Internet, Prods Copyright Owners
    20/03/2013: European Court Upholds Confidentiality In International Treaty Talks
    18/03/2013: UN Agencies To Examine International Standards, Potential Value For Developing Countries
    13/03/2013: On Plant Patents, EPO President Backs Industry, Disregards EU Parliament, Group Says
    08/03/2013: US Defender Of Internet Freedom, Keen On Protecting IP Rights
    07/03/2013: WTO Hears Health, Economic Considerations Of Plain Packaging For Tobacco
    06/03/2013: Academics Criticise Handling Of Cultural Diversity, Traditional Knowledge At International Level
    05/03/2013: Monsanto v. Bowman: Stocktaking After Supreme Court Hearings
    05/03/2013: Bayer Will Appeal India Compulsory Licence On Its Cancer Drug
    04/03/2013: Inside Views: Should Industry Support LDCs’ Request For Unlimited Time To Implement The TRIPS Agreement? Absolutely
    04/03/2013: Patent Pool-ViiV Collaboration On Paediatric HIV Sparks Reactions, Hope
    01/03/2013: WIPO Patent Law Committee Cinches Agreement On Future Work
    27/02/2013: With Lively Start, African IP Conference Addresses Medicines Access, GIs
    26/02/2013: UN Agency Ties Fraudulent Pharmaceuticals To Organised Crime In West Africa
    23/02/2013: WIPO Blind Treaty Text Shapes Up On Last Day; More Drafting In April
    21/02/2013: WIPO Treaty For The Blind: Rightsholders Seek Safeguards, Civil Society Seeks Real Access
    21/02/2013: WIPO Negotiations: Latest Text Of Treaty For The Blind Is Short On Progress
    20/02/2013: Blind Treaty Discussions Could Wander, All Sides Ask For Focus
    19/02/2013: Closed Discussions At WIPO On Treaty For Blind, As New Text Emerges
    16/02/2013: Indian Users’ Perspective On WIPO Negotiations On Treaty For Visually Impaired
    15/02/2013: WIPO Delegates To Clean Text Of Blind Treaty Before Diplomatic Conference In June
    Your IP address is 79.171.81.231