SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Finance

    25/09/2012: Special Report: Licensing Of News Titles And Extracts – Newspapers’ Best And Last Bet?
    12/09/2012: IFPMA Report, Panel, Examine Rise Of Industry Global Health Partnerships
    02/08/2012: In The Spirit Of Fair Play: A Primer On IP And The Olympics
    27/07/2012: Innovation And The Law: Some Lessons From The Patent Wars
    19/07/2012: IP Exchange ‘Getting Some Teeth’; First Offerings Likely In Autumn
    17/07/2012: EU, UK Announce Plans To Open Access To Scientific Research
    10/07/2012: EU Announces €11B R&D Programme For 2013
    03/07/2012: Switzerland Most Innovative Economy, Global Divide Persists, Says WIPO/INSEAD Index
    25/06/2012: A Bigger, Meaner Patent War
    19/06/2012: Music Publishers, Universal Sign “Groundbreaking” Licence Deal
    19/06/2012: Study Finds EU Copyright Law Harms Investment In Cloud Computing
    31/05/2012: Compulsory Licences Positive For The South, With Conditions, Study Finds
    25/05/2012: World Health Assembly: Agreement Reached On Neglected Disease R&D Process, But No Convention
    25/05/2012: World Health Assembly: Latest Texts Of R&D Drafting Group
    24/05/2012: World Health Assembly: R&D Drafting Group Documents Show Country Differences
    24/05/2012: World Health Assembly: Drafting Group Works To Combine Proposals On R&D
    22/05/2012: WHO Members To Address Proposals For Financing Developing Country R&D
    22/05/2012: Nobel Laureate, Other Experts Hail WHO Effort On Medicines R&D Framework
    21/05/2012: WHO Director Chan Opens Annual Assembly With Optimism, Despite Economic Woes
    11/05/2012: DNDi Backs WHO ‘Neglected Patients’ R&D Treaty
    02/05/2012: Full Agenda For WHO: Reform, R&D Convention, Substandard Medicines, NCDs, Pandemics
    01/05/2012: Music Industry Groups Await Judgment On Breakthrough Royalty Agreement
    27/04/2012: Confidential Documents Show Tough Staff Choices At Global Fund
    12/04/2012: US Government Report: IP Boon To US Economy, Accounts For 40 Million Jobs
    04/04/2012: EU Copyright Levy Debate Rekindled; UK Needs Better Licensing, Study Finds
    21/03/2012: French IP Industry Experts Discuss IP Portfolios, Trademarks Online
    20/03/2012: French IP Lawyers Prefer No Favours For Green Tech Patents; Welcome America Invents Act
    16/03/2012: Global Business Stands Up For Multilateral Trade At WTO
    13/03/2012: US Aims To Boost Its Efforts Against Overseas Infringers
    07/03/2012: Study Seeks To Correct Flaws In Europe’s Copyright Levy System
    13/02/2012: Obama’s Proposed Budget Raises R&D, Innovation Spending
    09/02/2012: Proposal For A New Model Giving Rights To Online Sharing Of Content
    02/02/2012: Will The Old Music Industry Giants Be Exchanged For New Ones?
    01/02/2012: WIPO Report Shows Strong Economic Contribution Of Copyright
    30/01/2012: WHO, Gates, Industry And NGO Leaders Elevate Attention To Neglected Diseases
    26/01/2012: Officials, Industry Discuss IPR In Relation To Economy And Society
    19/01/2012: Year Ahead: Busy Copyright Schedule As Europe Seeks Economic Recovery
    03/01/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Posts Of 2011 Tell Story Of International IP Policymaking
    14/12/2011: WHO Expert Group To Recommend Binding R&D Treaty Negotiation
    24/11/2011: IP, Trade And Public Health Leaders Turn A Page In History Together
    21/11/2011: EU’s Kroes Calls For New Thinking On Copyright System
    15/11/2011: WIPO: IP Policy Moves To Forefront Of Global Innovation
    11/11/2011: WIPO Audit/Evaluation Process Comes Of Age, With A Development Side
    09/11/2011: Less Copyright Liability Found To Boost Cloud Computing Investment
    02/11/2011: USPTO, Small Businesses Talk Patent Reform, Harmonisation, Fee Diversion
    27/10/2011: WIPO Re:Search Bridges Public, Private Sectors For Neglected Disease Research
    25/10/2011: WIPO Re:Search Webpage Goes Live, Shows Sponsors
    19/10/2011: WIPO To Launch New Drug R&D Database For Neglected Disease Licences
    18/10/2011: Inside Views: To Stem Infringement, Block Money – Not Information
    14/10/2011: Inside Views: Trade And Access To Medicines: Things The WTO Should Consider
    Your IP address is 107.22.127.92