Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Quantitative Analysis Of Contributions To NETMundial Meeting

A quantitative analysis of the 187 submissions to the April NETmundial conference on the future of internet governance shows broad support for improving security, ensuring respect for privacy, ensuring freedom of expression, and globalizing the IANA function, analyst Richard Hill writes.

Latest Comments
  • Why should anyone care what James Anaya thinks? In... »
  • If this goes ahead, as the EU will "speak" for all... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    09/05/2013: Experts Review UNEP Report On Green Economy And Trade
    06/05/2013: Cuba Files WTO Dispute Against Australia Over Tobacco Plain-Packaging
    30/04/2013: UNCTAD Handbook: IP And The CBD Protocol On Genetic Resources
    27/04/2013: Industry List Of Potential US GIs Released Ahead Of WIPO Meeting
    23/04/2013: Rethinking The Role Of Innovation In The Green Technologies Context
    19/04/2013: UN Economic Commission For Europe Looks At Innovation
    05/04/2013: African Regional Plant Variety Protection Draft Legislation Raises Protest
    01/04/2013: GI Experts Speak Of Value But Concede International Accord Hard To Reach
    28/03/2013: Report Analyses Fast-Track Green Patent Applications
    27/03/2013: Biovision: Personalised Medicine, Climate Change, Sustainability Need Innovation
    25/03/2013: UPOV 1991 Will Adversely Impact Farmers In Tanzania, Civil Society And Farmers Say
    18/03/2013: UN Agencies To Examine International Standards, Potential Value For Developing Countries
    13/03/2013: On Plant Patents, EPO President Backs Industry, Disregards EU Parliament, Group Says
    08/03/2013: Report On Seed Giants’ Initiatives To Preserve Monopoly On Global Food
    05/03/2013: Monsanto v. Bowman: Stocktaking After Supreme Court Hearings
    28/02/2013: Global Health Giants, Trade Deals, And IP Play Central Role In 2013 Public Health Policy
    26/02/2013: Report Finds Stronger Regulation Spurs Chemical Innovation
    18/02/2013: Monsanto, Myriad: Two US Legal Cases Shaking Biotech Industries
    13/02/2013: Event Explains Partnerships In Natural Products Research Through Thai Experience With Novartis
    12/02/2013: Year Ahead In IP, Biotech, Biodiversity: A Trio Fuelling Debates, Opportunities In 2013
    08/02/2013: Draft Text On Protection Of Genetic Resources On Its Way To WIPO Assembly
    08/02/2013: WIPO Update: Improved Text On Genetic Resources; Disclosure Still Undecided
    08/02/2013: Genetic Origin In Food And Agriculture Difficult To Identify, Say Seed Treaty Officials
    05/02/2013: Indigenous Peoples Rights’ Reaffirmed By UN Rapporteur, Panellists, At WIPO
    05/02/2013: Expiring GMO Patents Raise Regulatory Issues; Private Sector Takes Measures
    04/02/2013: FAO: New GMOs Rising In Developing Countries; Public Sector Key
    04/02/2013: Plant Variety Protection Meets Resistance in Developing Countries; Consultations Coming
    01/02/2013: Intense Drafting Session Ahead For WIPO Delegates Working On Genetic Resources
    01/02/2013: Inside Views — Genetic Resources And Traditional Knowledge : Getting The Rules Right For Agriculture: A Key Challenge For WIPO’s IGC
    18/01/2013: Syngenta Opens Doors To Its Patented Technologies, For Easier But Not Free Access
    09/01/2013: IP-Watch Looks At The Year Ahead In International IP Policy
    21/12/2012: US Supreme Court Poised To Rule Human Genes Are Not Patentable
    29/11/2012: EU Parliament To Vote On Measure Against Biopiracy; Focus On UN Protocol
    28/11/2012: Fast-Tracking Green Patents Reduces Wait Time, Appeals To Start-Ups, Study Finds
    27/11/2012: European Commission, ARIPO Sign Agreement On Agricultural GIs
    19/11/2012: Serageldin: IPR Adaptation Needed To Help Innovation Reach Small Farmers
    16/11/2012: Study: UN Development Needs Reform; US, Indian Ambassadors Agree
    15/11/2012: Pending Decision On GM Maize In Mexico Under Fire
    05/11/2012: UPOV Hails Benefits of Plant Variety Protection; Civil Society Frustrated
    29/10/2012: UPOV Council To Formalise Access To Documents; Civil Society Seeks Greater Participation
    22/10/2012: UN: Governments To Double Biodiversity Funding, Push Access/Benefit-Sharing
    17/10/2012: More Production Not The Way To Sustainable Agriculture, UN Study Says
    15/10/2012: Civil Society Network Issues Proposals On Climate Change And IPRs
    05/10/2012: India Ratifies Nagoya Protocol On Biodiversity Access And Benefit-Sharing
    26/09/2012: Agricultural Innovation Needed In Africa, With Farmers’ Participation, WTO Panellists Say
    17/08/2012: Isolated DNA Declared Patentable By US Court Of Appeals
    03/07/2012: Nagoya Protocol Access & Benefit-Sharing Meeting Kicks Off In New Delhi
    25/06/2012: Rio+20 Climate Talks Finish With Little IP; Flexibilities Under Fire
    20/06/2012: Near-Final Draft Of Rio+20 Outcome Document Shows Likely Commitments
    18/06/2012: Rio+20 Conference Opens With IP, Tech Transfer, Underlying Debate
    Your IP address is