SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Environment

    03/07/2012: Nagoya Protocol Access & Benefit-Sharing Meeting Kicks Off In New Delhi
    25/06/2012: Rio+20 Climate Talks Finish With Little IP; Flexibilities Under Fire
    20/06/2012: Near-Final Draft Of Rio+20 Outcome Document Shows Likely Commitments
    18/06/2012: Rio+20 Conference Opens With IP, Tech Transfer, Underlying Debate
    15/06/2012: UNCTAD Report Sees Sustainable African Growth In IP Flexibilities
    13/06/2012: Plant Patentability Questions Deepen In EPO Tomato Patent Case
    18/05/2012: US Licensing Experts: Innovation Is Still Happening, Let’s Help It Along
    14/04/2012: Negotiators Aim For Progress On Traditional Knowledge Protection Treaty
    05/04/2012: EPO Response: No Tricks On Patents On Seeds And Plants
    05/04/2012: After Mayo, Is Patent Law More Restrictive In US Than Europe?
    02/04/2012: Book Details IP Rights And Development
    20/03/2012: French IP Lawyers Prefer No Favours For Green Tech Patents; Welcome America Invents Act
    14/03/2012: WIPO To Discuss Role Of Patents In Access To Water
    07/03/2012: A High-Level Collegium Calls For New Global Governance
    23/02/2012: WIPO Achieves Single Legal Text On Genetic Resources; Indigenous Peoples Back
    22/02/2012: Indigenous Peoples Walk Out Of WIPO Committee On Genetic Resources
    19/02/2012: WIPO Members Work Through Differences In Genetic Resources Document
    17/02/2012: WIPO Members Begin Work On Single Text On IP And Genetic Resources
    15/02/2012: WIPO Members Aim For Single Text On Genetic Resources Protection
    13/02/2012: Ideas Offered For IP And Genetic Resources In WIPO Committee
    08/02/2012: In 2012: Are Biotech, Ethics And Biodiversity Friends or Foes?
    26/01/2012: Officials, Industry Discuss IPR In Relation To Economy And Society
    16/01/2012: Danish EU Presidency Priorities Include Research, Innovation, IP Rights
    11/01/2012: Book: Shape Up International Reforms To Address Food Security
    03/01/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Posts Of 2011 Tell Story Of International IP Policymaking
    06/12/2011: America Invents Act Forges Ahead; Concerns Remain About First-To-File, Other Provisions
    04/12/2011: Ways Forward Proposed For Tech Transfer & IP At Durban Climate Talks
    16/11/2011: European Audit Of GIs Shows Need For Clear Rules, Awareness
    27/10/2011: Revised EPO Patent For Conventional Broccoli Has Public Interest Ramifications
    20/10/2011: UPOV Sprouts A New Public Face – As Farmers Protest
    20/10/2011: UPOV Marks 50 Years; Breeders Seek More Enforcement, Civil Society Wants In
    11/10/2011: Unpunished Human Rights Violations Challenge Right To Food, Activists Say
    19/07/2011: Kenya Opens Region’s Door To GM Maize
    14/07/2011: Inside Views: Interview With Chief Judge Paul R. Michel On US Patent Reform
    14/07/2011: WIPO, The ‘Sleeping Beauty’ Of Climate Change Policy, Urged To Awaken
    08/07/2011: WIPO Ventures Into Global Debate On Climate Change
    28/06/2011: WIPO Seminar: IP Is Spearhead Of Agricultural Innovation, Solution To Food Shortage
    27/06/2011: New FAO Chief Accepts GMOs, Not Seed Monopolies
    24/06/2011: US Patent Reform Advances Furthest In Congress In 10 Years
    08/06/2011: Merck Donates Natural Products Library For Research
    16/05/2011: Patent Licensing Experts Share Lessons Learned In Making Deals
    14/05/2011: Indigenous Peoples Won’t Be “Wished Away” In Traditional Knowledge Treaty Talks
    13/05/2011: WIPO Members Tee Up Negotiation On Traditional Knowledge, Cultural Expressions
    19/04/2011: Book Explores Intersection Of Policymaking In IP, Biodiversity
    18/04/2011: Biodiversity, Climate Change Policy On Convergent Roads, Paper Says
    08/04/2011: Study: Change Needed At Plant Varieties Agency; WTO Talks Food Standards
    30/03/2011: FAO Seed Treaty Carries Hope, Addressing Country Contributions, Farmers Concerns
    30/03/2011: US Farmers Sue Monsanto Over GMO Patents, Demand Right To Conventional Crops
    28/03/2011: Experts Meet To Weigh Health And Environment Scientific Innovations
    09/03/2011: UN Rapporteur On Food Offers Long-Term Answer To Food Crisis: Agroecology
    Your IP address is 54.224.75.101