SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Development

    11/03/2013: Digital Rights, Health Concerns As TPP Talks Continue
    08/03/2013: Report On Seed Giants’ Initiatives To Preserve Monopoly On Global Food
    06/03/2013: WTO: Wide Support For LDC TRIPS Extension, With A Hitch
    06/03/2013: Academics Criticise Handling Of Cultural Diversity, Traditional Knowledge At International Level
    05/03/2013: Bayer Will Appeal India Compulsory Licence On Its Cancer Drug
    04/03/2013: India’s First Compulsory Licence Upheld, But Legal Fights Likely To Continue
    04/03/2013: Inside Views: Should Industry Support LDCs’ Request For Unlimited Time To Implement The TRIPS Agreement? Absolutely
    04/03/2013: Patent Pool-ViiV Collaboration On Paediatric HIV Sparks Reactions, Hope
    01/03/2013: Global Fund Launches New Funding Model
    01/03/2013: Speakers Outline Ideas For Africa To Find Appropriate IP Policies
    28/02/2013: South Africa Leaning Toward Support Of Pan-African IP Office, Minister Says
    27/02/2013: WIPO Members Struggle To Define Work Programme On Patents And Health
    27/02/2013: With Lively Start, African IP Conference Addresses Medicines Access, GIs
    26/02/2013: Report Finds Stronger Regulation Spurs Chemical Innovation
    26/02/2013: UN Agency Ties Fraudulent Pharmaceuticals To Organised Crime In West Africa
    26/02/2013: WTO: LDCs To Press For Extension For TRIPS, Plain Packaging Back
    26/02/2013: WIPO Patent Committee Moves Quickly Through Agenda; Heavy Lifting To Come
    23/02/2013: WIPO Blind Treaty Text Shapes Up On Last Day; More Drafting In April
    20/02/2013: Blind Treaty Discussions Could Wander, All Sides Ask For Focus
    19/02/2013: Closed Discussions At WIPO On Treaty For Blind, As New Text Emerges
    16/02/2013: Indian Users’ Perspective On WIPO Negotiations On Treaty For Visually Impaired
    16/02/2013: Report On First Round Of Projects Of Seed Treaty Benefit-Sharing Fund
    15/02/2013: Obama Takes Swipe At Patent Trolls In Call For Further Reform
    15/02/2013: WIPO Delegates To Clean Text Of Blind Treaty Before Diplomatic Conference In June
    13/02/2013: Event Explains Partnerships In Natural Products Research Through Thai Experience With Novartis
    13/02/2013: WIPO Side Event Addresses Recent Developments Related To The Nagoya Protocol
    12/02/2013: Letter Shows US Pressure On Global Fund For Compulsory Licensing, Generics
    08/02/2013: Draft Text On Protection Of Genetic Resources On Its Way To WIPO Assembly
    08/02/2013: WIPO Update: Improved Text On Genetic Resources; Disclosure Still Undecided
    06/02/2013: New Text Issued In WIPO Genetic Resources Talks
    06/02/2013: African Union Declares It Will Proceed With Pan-African IP Office
    05/02/2013: Indigenous Peoples Rights’ Reaffirmed By UN Rapporteur, Panellists, At WIPO
    04/02/2013: FAO: New GMOs Rising In Developing Countries; Public Sector Key
    04/02/2013: Plant Variety Protection Meets Resistance in Developing Countries; Consultations Coming
    03/02/2013: Polio Talks At WHO Board: Between Progress Made, The Final Push And The Role Of Partnership
    01/02/2013: Intense Drafting Session Ahead For WIPO Delegates Working On Genetic Resources
    01/02/2013: Inside Views — Genetic Resources And Traditional Knowledge : Getting The Rules Right For Agriculture: A Key Challenge For WIPO’s IGC
    31/01/2013: Inside Views: Pending Cutback In EU Spending For Development Cooperation
    30/01/2013: WHO Executive Board Concludes After ‘Unpredecented’ Workload
    29/01/2013: Inside Views: Potential Elements Of The WHO Global R&D Treaty: Tailoring Solutions For Disparate Contexts
    28/01/2013: WHO Plan For Pandemic Flu Proceeds With Questions
    25/01/2013: Governments Put WHO’s Independence At Heart Of Reform Debate
    23/01/2013: IP Professionals Discuss Tech Transfer Potential In Humanitarian Business At WIPO
    22/01/2013: UNITAID Seeks Bids For ‘Freedom To Operate’ IPR Analyses For HIV Products
    22/01/2013: 2013: India Battles For Right To Use Compulsory Licences To Make Medicines Affordable
    16/01/2013: Free Drugs Are “Crucial Part” Of Neglected Tropical Disease Fight
    09/01/2013: IP-Watch Looks At The Year Ahead In International IP Policy
    02/01/2013: Inside Views: Collaborative Capacity Building In Intellectual Property — Leveraging On African Diaspora Exchange
    21/12/2012: At WIPO, A Complex Fight Against Counterfeiting, Piracy
    19/12/2012: WIPO Treaty For Blind Negotiation Set For Mid-June In Marrakesh
    Your IP address is 72.44.48.122