SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Development

    25/05/2013: WIPO Members Debate Reduction Of PCT Fees; Send Back PPH Proposal
    24/05/2013: World Health Assembly: Members Debate US Proposed Advisory Meeting On Health R&D
    24/05/2013: At WTO, LDC Fight For Extension Of TRIPS Transition Continues
    24/05/2013: GI Proponents Assess Progress, Challenges; French Minister Blasts Large-Scale Agriculture
    21/05/2013: WIPO Unveils Results Of Training Department Assessment, But Keeps Document Secret
    18/05/2013: WIPO Development Committee Ends On Positive Note With Modest Results
    17/05/2013: Micro Consensus on WIPO Technical Assistance; Prickly Issues Left Open
    15/05/2013: WHO Stats Show Medicines Remain Out Of Reach Of Poorest Patients
    15/05/2013: EPO-UNEP Report Examines Patents And Clean Energy
    14/05/2013: Concerns Arise Over Implementation Of WIPO Development Agenda
    13/05/2013: European Commission To Develop Global Internet Policy Platform
    13/05/2013: WIPO Committee On Development This Week: North-South Differences
    10/05/2013: Obama Administration Backs New Open Data Policy
    09/05/2013: LDC Request For Waiver Of IP Obligations Meets Conditions From Developed Countries
    03/05/2013: GIs Closer To International Status As WIPO Committee Recommends Treaty Negotiation
    02/05/2013: ASEAN Launches Portal To Facilitate IP Awareness
    02/05/2013: GIs Rub Against Trademark Protection In WIPO Discussions On Protection
    01/05/2013: Experts Offer Perspectives On R&D Policies In The Public Health Domain
    30/04/2013: UNCTAD Handbook: IP And The CBD Protocol On Genetic Resources
    29/04/2013: UNCTAD: IPRs In Health, Research, Cosmetics, Meet Access & Benefit Sharing
    26/04/2013: In “Great Shame,” WIPO Fund For Indigenous Peoples’ Participation Running Dry
    25/04/2013: WIPO Demonstrates 3D Printing: Making The Impossible Possible
    24/04/2013: WIPO Committee Issues Revised Text On Traditional Knowledge Protection
    22/04/2013: Protecting Traditional Knowledge: WIPO Members Back To The Drafting Table
    22/04/2013: Curbing Vaccine Costs Key To Extending Global Immunisation Reach
    22/04/2013: Mixed Reactions Among Participants In WIPO Talks On Treaty For The Blind
    22/04/2013: WIPO Members Send Draft Treaty For The Blind To Marrakesh
    20/04/2013: In UN Talks On Treaty For The Blind, Concern About Heavy Focus On Rightholders’ Interests
    19/04/2013: Time Ticking For WIPO Delegates On Copyright Exceptions Treaty
    19/04/2013: ISOC, IETF Promote Open Standardisation, Consider What’s “Open”?
    17/04/2013: Last Drafting Effort On WIPO Treaty For The Blind Before Diplomatic Conference
    15/04/2013: Inside Views: The Novartis Decision: A Tale Of Developing Countries, IP, And The Role Of The Judiciary
    10/04/2013: Lack Of Progress In Closing Digital Divide Gap, Says World Economic Forum
    09/04/2013: Health Research Colloquium Calls On Countries To Invest More In R&D
    09/04/2013: WIPO Hails India’s Accession To Trademark System; India Advocates Balance
    05/04/2013: North American Universities Seen Failing To Promote Socially Responsible Licensing
    05/04/2013: African Regional Plant Variety Protection Draft Legislation Raises Protest
    04/04/2013: Inside Views: The Judgment In Novartis v. India: What The Supreme Court Of India Said
    04/04/2013: Linguistic Diversity Essential For Innovation, Development, Roundtable Speakers Say
    01/04/2013: Novartis Loses Patent Bid: Lessons From India’s 3(d) Experience
    01/04/2013: Singapore Reveals 10-Year Plan To Be Global IP Hub
    01/04/2013: GI Experts Speak Of Value But Concede International Accord Hard To Reach
    28/03/2013: East African Community Doubles Efforts To Boost Local Drug Production
    26/03/2013: United States Chided As TRIPS Scofflaw At WTO
    26/03/2013: Innovation, IPR Cooperation Among Top Priorities For BRICS
    25/03/2013: UPOV 1991 Will Adversely Impact Farmers In Tanzania, Civil Society And Farmers Say
    25/03/2013: Inside Views: South Africa: Trampling Tradition – A Call For Support
    25/03/2013: Diverging Views On IPR Protection Needs In Africa Emerge At IP Workshop
    21/03/2013: Global Pharma Companies See Battle For Survival In Pakistan
    20/03/2013: At US-Led Workshop, African Stakeholders Call For “Home Grown IP Agenda”
    Your IP address is 79.171.81.119