Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Ten Questions About Internet Governance

On April 23 in Sao Paulo, Brazil, the “Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance,” also known as “NETmundial” in an allusion to the global football event that will occur later in that country, will be convened. Juan Alfonso Fernández González of the Cuban Communications Ministry and a veteran of the UN internet governance meetings, raises 10 questions that need to be answered at NETmundial.

Latest Comments
  • These obscured negotiations appear to this reader ... »
  • The EU or the US are not the banana states for whi... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech

    31/07/2013: Infojustice: The Question Of Patent Eligible Subject Matter And Evergreening Practices
    30/07/2013: EFPIA, PhRMA Release Joint Principles For Clinical Trial Data-Sharing, To Criticism
    30/07/2013: IP And Public Health, Biotech Rise As Issues In TPP Negotiations
    25/07/2013: WIPO General Assembly Left To Decide Future Work Of TK Committee
    24/07/2013: WIPO Talks On Future Of TK, Genetic Resources, Folklore Intensify
    23/07/2013: WIPO Committee To Decide Fate Of Treaties To Protect TK, Genetic Resources, Folklore
    22/07/2013: Report Seeks To Advance Discussions On Shared Traditional Knowledge
    17/07/2013: QUNO: Don’t Forget Small Farmers In WIPO GR Negotiations
    11/07/2013: US Subcommittee Examines Toxic Substances Control Act, IP Protection
    03/07/2013: Questions Arise Over EU Draft Regulation To Implement Nagoya Protocol
    03/07/2013: Public Interest Groups Ask US Court To Invalidate Stem Cell Patent
    24/06/2013: US Gives Boost To Materials Genome Initiative
    21/06/2013: Harvard Professor A Flag Bearer For Agricultural Innovation, Biotechnologies In Africa
    20/06/2013: Asia-Pacific Region Vies For Biotechnology Industry Opportunities
    17/06/2013: US Supreme Court Restricts Gene Patents … A Little
    14/06/2013: Myriad Case Decided: Natural Human Genes Not Patentable In US
    29/05/2013: Civil Society Observer At UPOV Gets A Public Face
    24/05/2013: EPO Still Granting Patents On Conventional Vegetables; ‘Just Following Rules’
    17/05/2013: WIPO Programmes Seek To Bridge IP And Climate Change, Global Health
    13/05/2013: US Supreme Court Rules In Favour Of Monsanto In Patent Exhaustion Case
    30/04/2013: UNCTAD Handbook: IP And The CBD Protocol On Genetic Resources
    29/04/2013: UNCTAD: IPRs In Health, Research, Cosmetics, Meet Access & Benefit Sharing
    28/04/2013: New WIPO Text On Traditional Knowledge Protection Cleaner But Issues Remain
    27/04/2013: Industry List Of Potential US GIs Released Ahead Of WIPO Meeting
    23/04/2013: US Supreme Court May Invalidate Gene Patents, But Create Little Change
    23/04/2013: Rethinking The Role Of Innovation In The Green Technologies Context
    17/04/2013: Greek Gene Bank’s Struggle Indicative Of Changing Times
    15/04/2013: Inside Views: The Novartis Decision: A Tale Of Developing Countries, IP, And The Role Of The Judiciary
    11/04/2013: Reports: Obama’s Proposed 2014 Budget Favours Patent Office, R&D, Generic Drugs
    09/04/2013: WIPO Hails India’s Accession To Trademark System; India Advocates Balance
    05/04/2013: African Regional Plant Variety Protection Draft Legislation Raises Protest
    04/04/2013: Inside Views: The Judgment In Novartis v. India: What The Supreme Court Of India Said
    03/04/2013: Australian Pharmaceutical Patents Review Draft Report Critical Of Patent Extensions, R&D Funding
    01/04/2013: Novartis Loses Patent Bid: Lessons From India’s 3(d) Experience
    01/04/2013: India Dismisses Antitrust Complaint Against Gilead Sciences
    01/04/2013: GI Experts Speak Of Value But Concede International Accord Hard To Reach
    27/03/2013: Biovision: Personalised Medicine, Climate Change, Sustainability Need Innovation
    26/03/2013: Rules Changing For Life Sciences Tech Transfer, IP, Speakers Say
    26/03/2013: United States Chided As TRIPS Scofflaw At WTO
    25/03/2013: UPOV 1991 Will Adversely Impact Farmers In Tanzania, Civil Society And Farmers Say
    22/03/2013: Conference Addresses Current Issues For Corporate IP Counsel
    18/03/2013: UN Agencies To Examine International Standards, Potential Value For Developing Countries
    13/03/2013: On Plant Patents, EPO President Backs Industry, Disregards EU Parliament, Group Says
    08/03/2013: Report On Seed Giants’ Initiatives To Preserve Monopoly On Global Food
    05/03/2013: Monsanto v. Bowman: Stocktaking After Supreme Court Hearings
    01/03/2013: Speakers Outline Ideas For Africa To Find Appropriate IP Policies
    28/02/2013: Global Health Giants, Trade Deals, And IP Play Central Role In 2013 Public Health Policy
    27/02/2013: Change to UK Patents Act Removes Infringement For Use Of Clinical Trial Data
    26/02/2013: Report Finds Stronger Regulation Spurs Chemical Innovation
    18/02/2013: Monsanto, Myriad: Two US Legal Cases Shaking Biotech Industries
    Your IP address is