SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

To What Extent Can Global IP Rules Be Responsive To Public Interest Demands? The Case Of The Treaty For The Visually Impaired

To what extent can global intellectual property rules address in an effective manner the needs of the most vulnerable members of society? This is the key question with which member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) are faced as they prepare to meet next week for a diplomatic conference, in Marrakesh, that should result in the adoption of a treaty to facilitate access to copyrighted works by visually impaired persons and persons with print disabilities.


Interview With Tanja Rajić: The Impact Of EU Enlargement On Trademark Practice In Croatia

Ten years after applying for membership, Croatia is finally joining the European Union on 1 July 2013. Tanja Rajić, senior associate at PETOSEVIC, explains how six years of accession negotiations and the adoption of the acquis communautaire have affected intellectual property protection in Croatia and prepared it for becoming a member state.





Latest Comments
  • We in India should not change our policy, speciall... »
  • We in India should not change our policy, speciall... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech

    03/02/2013: Polio Talks At WHO Board: Between Progress Made, The Final Push And The Role Of Partnership
    01/02/2013: Intense Drafting Session Ahead For WIPO Delegates Working On Genetic Resources
    01/02/2013: Inside Views — Genetic Resources And Traditional Knowledge : Getting The Rules Right For Agriculture: A Key Challenge For WIPO’s IGC
    28/01/2013: WHO Board Approves Resolution On Neglected Diseases; Sets Action On Substandard Medicines
    28/01/2013: Debate Erupts At WHO Over “Consensus” On Financing R&D For The Poor
    28/01/2013: WHO Plan For Pandemic Flu Proceeds With Questions
    18/01/2013: Syngenta Opens Doors To Its Patented Technologies, For Easier But Not Free Access
    09/01/2013: IP-Watch Looks At The Year Ahead In International IP Policy
    02/01/2013: Inside Views: Collaborative Capacity Building In Intellectual Property — Leveraging On African Diaspora Exchange
    21/12/2012: US Supreme Court Poised To Rule Human Genes Are Not Patentable
    30/11/2012: WIPO Members To Decide On GI Protection: Revised Agreement Or New Treaty?
    29/11/2012: WHO Members Agree On “Strategic Work Plan” On Health R&D – But No Convention
    29/11/2012: EU Parliament To Vote On Measure Against Biopiracy; Focus On UN Protocol
    27/11/2012: European Commission, ARIPO Sign Agreement On Agricultural GIs
    19/11/2012: Serageldin: IPR Adaptation Needed To Help Innovation Reach Small Farmers
    15/11/2012: Pending Decision On GM Maize In Mexico Under Fire
    08/11/2012: India Publishes Draft Guidelines For Patenting Of TK and Biological Material
    07/11/2012: WTO Members Launch Debate On IP And Innovation; LDCs Seek More Time To Enforce IP Rules
    05/11/2012: WTO TRIPS Council To Consider New Brazil-United States Item On Innovation
    05/11/2012: UPOV Hails Benefits of Plant Variety Protection; Civil Society Frustrated
    01/11/2012: Pharma Outlook: Don’t Yield On IP, Work On Trust-Building, Call For Global Cooperation
    29/10/2012: UPOV Council To Formalise Access To Documents; Civil Society Seeks Greater Participation
    23/10/2012: Horticultural Breeders Call For Stronger Protection Of Innovations
    22/10/2012: UN: Governments To Double Biodiversity Funding, Push Access/Benefit-Sharing
    17/10/2012: More Production Not The Way To Sustainable Agriculture, UN Study Says
    12/10/2012: UN High-Level Meeting In India On Biodiversity Addresses Access And Benefit-Sharing
    09/10/2012: GI Protection Gets Boost In BRICs; Common Definition Needed For International Debates
    07/10/2012: WIPO Members (Again) Intensify Talks On Genetic Material, TK, Folklore
    05/10/2012: India Ratifies Nagoya Protocol On Biodiversity Access And Benefit-Sharing
    26/09/2012: Agricultural Innovation Needed In Africa, With Farmers’ Participation, WTO Panellists Say
    17/08/2012: Isolated DNA Declared Patentable By US Court Of Appeals
    07/08/2012: A Look At India’s Key Pharmaceutical Patent Case
    10/07/2012: New CBD Head: IPR Still Key To Nagoya Protocol On Access And Benefit-Sharing
    06/07/2012: WIPO Committee Makes Last Run At Folklore Treaty Text Before Annual Assembly
    03/07/2012: Nagoya Protocol Access & Benefit-Sharing Meeting Kicks Off In New Delhi
    25/06/2012: Rio+20 Climate Talks Finish With Little IP; Flexibilities Under Fire
    21/06/2012: BIO Releases Consultant Report Promoting IP Rights
    20/06/2012: Near-Final Draft Of Rio+20 Outcome Document Shows Likely Commitments
    13/06/2012: Plant Patentability Questions Deepen In EPO Tomato Patent Case
    11/06/2012: Promotion: Upcoming Courses And Events Provide Insights Into IP
    29/05/2012: EU Parliament Advises No Patent On Conventional Breeding
    26/05/2012: World Health Assembly: Member States Call For Acceleration On Pandemic Flu Preparedness
    24/05/2012: Group Looks At Effects Of America Invents Act On Plant Breeders
    18/05/2012: US Licensing Experts: Innovation Is Still Happening, Let’s Help It Along
    17/05/2012: South Africa Hopes New Bill Brings Traditional Knowledge Protection
    12/05/2012: Agreement On Future Work For Development Committee Snatched From Defeat At WIPO
    21/04/2012: Frustrations Show At Slow Progress On Protection Of Traditional Knowledge at WIPO
    18/04/2012: Divergences Clarified On Protection Of Traditional Knowledge At WIPO
    16/04/2012: Medicines Patent Pool Director Ellen ‘t Hoen To Leave Next Month
    14/04/2012: Negotiators Aim For Progress On Traditional Knowledge Protection Treaty
    Your IP address is 107.20.7.65