SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Subscribers

    27/11/2012: Special Report: With Poor And Uninsured A Majority, Southeast Asia Sees Rise In Generics
    22/11/2012: Latest Text Of Treaty For Visually Impaired Shows More Work Needed
    21/11/2012: Overseas Manufacturing Creates Copyright Dilemma For US Supreme Court
    12/11/2012: Southeast Asian States Move To Harmonise Their E-Commerce Laws
    09/11/2012: WHO Negotiations On Global Monitoring Framework Seen As Success In Noncommunicable Disease Fight
    07/11/2012: WTO Members Launch Debate On IP And Innovation; LDCs Seek More Time To Enforce IP Rules
    23/10/2012: WHO Member States Hammering Out Details On Noncommunicable Diseases
    19/10/2012: Subscriber Update: New Document On Visually Impaired Treaty At WIPO
    18/10/2012: New USPTO Post-Grant Review A Small Step For Patent Harmonisation
    16/10/2012: Standards-Setting Organisations Increasingly Make IPR A Priority
    12/10/2012: ITU Undertakes Work On Standards Essential Patents
    10/10/2012: Talks Ongoing To Raise Quality Of International Patents
    09/10/2012: GI Protection Gets Boost In BRICs; Common Definition Needed For International Debates
    08/10/2012: No Deal For Now On WIPO Design Treaty, Patent Law Work Plan
    08/10/2012: At WHO, Pharma Suggests Payment Plan For Influenza Virus Use
    27/09/2012: IP And The White House: What Happens With IP Issues After The US Presidential Election?
    25/09/2012: Special Report: Licensing Of News Titles And Extracts – Newspapers’ Best And Last Bet?
    24/09/2012: A Look At Who’s Who In Geneva IP Policymaking And Beyond
    20/09/2012: US And UN Consider New Limits On Patent Wars
    19/09/2012: Hope To Advance Industrial Design Treaty At WIPO Meets Reluctance From Developing Countries
    13/09/2012: America Invents Act: Another Piece Of Patent Reform Puzzle Falls Into Place
    12/09/2012: IFPMA Report, Panel, Examine Rise Of Industry Global Health Partnerships
    27/07/2012: Innovation And The Law: Some Lessons From The Patent Wars
    24/07/2012: Interview: Director Francis Gurry On Vision, Priorities For WIPO
    23/07/2012: WIPO Copyright Committee Negotiating Texts Available
    19/07/2012: IP Exchange ‘Getting Some Teeth’; First Offerings Likely In Autumn
    16/07/2012: Industry Groups Press For EU, US Action On Trade Secret Protection
    06/07/2012: WIPO Committee Makes Last Run At Folklore Treaty Text Before Annual Assembly
    03/07/2012: ICANN Says Internet Multi-Stakeholder Model Is Its Responsibility
    28/06/2012: Licensing, Generic Competition Needed To Drive Down HIV Drug Prices, Speakers Say
    27/06/2012: People: Keeping Pace With The IP Crowd’s Latest Moves
    27/06/2012: UK Parliament Panel Urges Government To Speed IP Reforms
    25/06/2012: A Bigger, Meaner Patent War
    20/06/2012: Near-Final Draft Of Rio+20 Outcome Document Shows Likely Commitments
    19/06/2012: File Sharing More Opportunity Than Burden, Says Speaker At WIPO
    19/06/2012: WTO Review Provides Update On China’s IP Rise
    06/06/2012: Discussion On Counterfeits With A Flavour Of Rum At WTO TRIPS Council
    31/05/2012: Compulsory Licences Positive For The South, With Conditions, Study Finds
    28/05/2012: World Health Assembly: WHO Carves Out Leadership Role In “Vaccine Decade”
    24/05/2012: US, China To Hold Landmark Intellectual Property Adjudication Meeting
    22/05/2012: WIPO Committee On Law Of Patents Walks A Fine Line
    18/05/2012: US Licensing Experts: Innovation Is Still Happening, Let’s Help It Along
    15/05/2012: 15 Years Later, Prospects For WTO Information Technology Agreement Examined
    11/05/2012: ICANN IP Advisory Group: Whois, Dot-Brands, Contracts Key Sticking Points In New Domains
    08/05/2012: INTA: Corporate Call To Action On New Domains, Social Media, Counterfeiting
    07/05/2012: WIPO Standards Committee: IP Geeks Meet Policy Wonks
    03/05/2012: Viacom v. YouTube: Chipping Away At The DMCA
    01/05/2012: Industry Report On Trade Secret Theft, Congressional Demand For IP Protection, As US-China Meet
    01/05/2012: Music Industry Groups Await Judgment On Breakthrough Royalty Agreement
    01/05/2012: Lines Of Geographical Indications Debate Begin To Take Shape In The United States
    Your IP address is 54.226.5.29