SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Subscribers

    17/05/2013: World Health Assembly Starts Next Week: R&D, NCDs, Pandemics Top Agenda
    03/05/2013: Shippers Becoming Anti-Counterfeiting Target; Europe Takes Other Measures
    25/04/2013: Anti-Counterfeiters Focus On Organised Crime, Softer Public Message
    23/04/2013: US Supreme Court May Invalidate Gene Patents, But Create Little Change
    23/04/2013: Rethinking The Role Of Innovation In The Green Technologies Context
    19/04/2013: UN Economic Commission For Europe Looks At Innovation
    12/04/2013: EU General Court Clears Copyright Collecting Societies Of Antitrust Charges
    01/04/2013: GI Experts Speak Of Value But Concede International Accord Hard To Reach
    28/03/2013: Royalty-Setting For Standard Essential Patents Might Be Balanced By Prospect Of Injunction, Speakers Say
    27/03/2013: Biovision: Personalised Medicine, Climate Change, Sustainability Need Innovation
    26/03/2013: Rules Changing For Life Sciences Tech Transfer, IP, Speakers Say
    22/03/2013: Conference Addresses Current Issues For Corporate IP Counsel
    19/03/2013: Samsung Lawyer Assesses IP Legal Battle With Apple
    18/03/2013: UN Agencies To Examine International Standards, Potential Value For Developing Countries
    14/03/2013: US Perspectives: US Tries Gentler Copyright Enforcement
    11/03/2013: Swiss Perspectives On The Success Of Its National Innovation Model
    05/03/2013: “Works For Hire” A Key Issue As Music Stars Begin Terminating Copyright Transfers
    28/02/2013: Global Health Giants, Trade Deals, And IP Play Central Role In 2013 Public Health Policy
    27/02/2013: European Copyright Reform On Slow Track, Observers Say
    27/02/2013: Recording Industry Sees New “Buzz” From Digital Revenues
    26/02/2013: WIPO Patent Committee Moves Quickly Through Agenda; Heavy Lifting To Come
    18/02/2013: Patent Outsourcing May Harm US Economy
    14/02/2013: EU Unitary Patent And Court Are Here. Or Are They?
    13/02/2013: Event Explains Partnerships In Natural Products Research Through Thai Experience With Novartis
    12/02/2013: Year Ahead In IP, Biotech, Biodiversity: A Trio Fuelling Debates, Opportunities In 2013
    08/02/2013: Genetic Origin In Food And Agriculture Difficult To Identify, Say Seed Treaty Officials
    07/02/2013: People: Tracking IP Influencers’ Latest Moves
    06/02/2013: New Text Issued In WIPO Genetic Resources Talks
    05/02/2013: Expiring GMO Patents Raise Regulatory Issues; Private Sector Takes Measures
    04/02/2013: FAO: New GMOs Rising In Developing Countries; Public Sector Key
    04/02/2013: Plant Variety Protection Meets Resistance in Developing Countries; Consultations Coming
    03/02/2013: Polio Talks At WHO Board: Between Progress Made, The Final Push And The Role Of Partnership
    31/01/2013: Mediator’s Report On EU Copyright Levies Recommends Major Changes
    31/01/2013: UNIGE Panel Promotes Advantages Of Trade Secret Protection
    23/01/2013: IP Professionals Discuss Tech Transfer Potential In Humanitarian Business At WIPO
    22/01/2013: 2013: India Battles For Right To Use Compulsory Licences To Make Medicines Affordable
    17/01/2013: The Big Shift: A Look At Key Issues In International Copyright In 2013
    11/01/2013: After A Tough 2012, IP Owners In US Face An Uncertain 2013
    21/12/2012: US Supreme Court Poised To Rule Human Genes Are Not Patentable
    17/12/2012: US Chamber Holds Annual IP Attaché Roundtable, Announces New “IP Index”
    16/12/2012: Publishers Seek Support For Their Approach To WIPO Treaty
    15/12/2012: IP Rockstar Says: IP In Business Is No Longer “Dessert,” More Like “Wine”
    13/12/2012: Waiting For Customs And Trademark Reforms, EU Rights Owners Get “Proactive” Against Fakes
    08/12/2012: Single European Patent Dominates IP Summit As European Parliament Vote Nears
    07/12/2012: Geographical Indications Catching Up With Appellations of Origin At WIPO
    05/12/2012: Survey On IP: Policymakers Believe Junk Statistics; North-South Divide Dissolving
    30/11/2012: WIPO Members To Decide On GI Protection: Revised Agreement Or New Treaty?
    30/11/2012: WIPO, EPO Leaders At OECD: Adjust The Patent System For The Globalised, Knowledge-Based Society
    27/11/2012: Special Report: With Poor And Uninsured A Majority, Southeast Asia Sees Rise In Generics
    22/11/2012: Latest Text Of Treaty For Visually Impaired Shows More Work Needed
    Your IP address is 79.171.81.120