SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments

For IPW Subscribers
A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

Monthly Reporter

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


Lobbying

10/09/2011: “Washington Declaration” Demands Return Of Public Interest In IP Rights
07/09/2011: US Chamber Urges More IP Protection As Job Booster; Tech Supporters Disagree
06/09/2011: Indian Supreme Court To Hear Novartis Challenge To India’s Patent Law
08/08/2011: Changes At The Top As RIAA Sees “Bright Future”
08/08/2011: Inside Views: Promoting Caribbean Intellectual Property Law
20/07/2011: WIPO Calls On Film Industry Stars To Promote Audiovisual Treaty
19/07/2011: WIPO Takes A Shot At ICANN’s Domain Dispute Reform
19/07/2011: US Chamber Urges Highest IP Standards In Trans-Pacific Trade Pact
14/07/2011: Interview With Chief Judge Paul R. Michel On US Patent Reform
12/07/2011: Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Did US Move Threaten Public Health?
08/07/2011: UN Body Addresses Problems With IP Rights Within Europe
30/06/2011: OECD Holds Ground On Strong IP Internet Policy Principles
28/06/2011: OECD Faces Concerns Over Its Internet Policy Principles
15/06/2011: An Urgent Letter From Intellectual Property Watch
13/06/2011: Time For A Positive Agenda, WIPO’s Gurry Tells Copyright Crowd
13/06/2011: New Brussels Lobbying Group Communia Works For A Stronger Public Domain
01/06/2011: A2K Standards Proposed for UN Consumer Guidelines
27/05/2011: IT Industry Sends Mixed Message To The Group Of 8 In Deauville
17/05/2011: Bill Gates Calls For “Vaccine Decade;” Explains How Patent System Drives Public Health Aid
16/05/2011: WIPO Goes To Bat For Trademark Owners At ICANN
15/05/2011: Sounding The Alarm: Return Of US Legislation Against Global “Rogue” Websites
14/05/2011: Indigenous Peoples Won’t Be “Wished Away” In Traditional Knowledge Treaty Talks
12/05/2011: New Texts In Play In WIPO Traditional Knowledge, Genetic Resources Talks
12/05/2011: Inside Views: Brazil’s Copyright Reform: Are We All Josef K.?
10/05/2011: Developing Countries Need Help To Get Research Results Patented, IP Proponent Says
06/05/2011: US Gets Threatening Over ICANN’s New Internet Domain Plan
03/05/2011: Consumers’ Rights Still Not On Equal Footing With Copyright Owners’, Study Finds
23/03/2011: Pharma Industry Seeks To Bring A Fresh Face To Public Health Policy
16/03/2011: US IP Enforcement Ambitions In Trans-Pacific Trade Agreement Stir Reactions
05/03/2011: US Panel Puts Google, Facebook, Communications Platforms On Human Rights Frontline
17/02/2011: WIPO Could Enter Growing Fray Over Internet Domain Takedowns
01/02/2011: People: New Lead For US Global IP Policy; KEI Lawyer To MSF; Copyright Kings In Washington
31/01/2011: Are European Think Tanks Corporate Lobbyists By Another Name?
28/01/2011: WTO Geographical Indications Talks Tiptoe; Substantive Discussion Coming
22/01/2011: WHO R&D Financing Committee Approved With Controversial Industry Expert
11/01/2011: Patent Reform, Piracy, Generic Drug Issues Likely For US Congress This Year
06/01/2011: Special Report: Music Industry’s Lavish Lobby Campaign For Digital Rights
30/12/2010: Top IP-Watch Stories Of 2010: Copyright Fights, ACTA, Medicines Access
20/12/2010: Both Sides Of US Copyright Wars Reloading For 2011
09/11/2010: Panellists: Copyright Law’s ‘Byzantine Maze’ Stalling New Business Models
07/11/2010: US FDA’s Tough Road Ahead In Creating Pathway For Life-Saving Biologics
21/10/2010: Indigenous Groups Allege Canadian Obstructionism To Biodiversity ABS Protocol
20/10/2010: Copyright Industry Makes Pitch For Economic Benefit Of Anti-Piracy In Developing Countries
13/10/2010: Sign Up For Email Alerts Of IP-Watch Burbles!
24/09/2010: Civil Society Fights For Participation As ACTA Counter To WIPO Rises
22/09/2010: Coherence Needed To Avoid Multilateral Legal Swamp, WTO Told
22/09/2010: Spanish Collecting Society Targets Group Proposing Alternative Royalty System
18/09/2010: US Companies, Officials Discuss Policies To Boost IP Value, Cut Costs
03/09/2010: Lack Of Transparency In EU-India FTA Talks Spurs Requests For Halt
30/08/2010: Special Report: Geneva, Public Health Capital Of The World