SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »
  • I deeply apprecite the initiative to combat agains... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Lobbying

    07/02/2012: Groups Call On Congress To Step Back From SOPA-Style Legislation
    02/02/2012: Will The Old Music Industry Giants Be Exchanged For New Ones?
    01/02/2012: WIPO Report Shows Strong Economic Contribution Of Copyright
    27/01/2012: World Economic Forum ‘Cyber Resilience’ Initiative Includes IP Protection
    26/01/2012: Officials, Industry Discuss IPR In Relation To Economy And Society
    25/01/2012: ICC’s 2012 IP Roadmap Lays Out Key Policy Issues
    23/01/2012: EU Telecoms Said To Be Unfairly Restricting Internet Access
    23/01/2012: Government Anti-Piracy Measures Working, Music Industry Says
    03/01/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Posts Of 2011 Tell Story Of International IP Policymaking
    22/12/2011: International Publishers Demand Egyptian Government Stop Attacks
    21/12/2011: IP Experts Focus On 3-Step Test In Copyright, Discuss Way Forward
    14/12/2011: UN, IMF, WTO, Other Organizations Raise Concern About New Domains
    08/12/2011: ICANN Warned Again In The US On New Internet Domains
    21/11/2011: 10 Years Of TRIPS And Public Health: An Anniversary To Celebrate?
    03/11/2011: Competing Industry Reports Show Economic Contributions Of Copyright, Fair Use
    01/11/2011: Tech Industry Sees Harm To Internet In US “Rogue Website” Bill
    27/10/2011: Revised EPO Patent For Conventional Broccoli Has Public Interest Ramifications
    24/10/2011: WIPO Defends Involvement In IP Enforcement Meeting In The Philippines
    20/10/2011: UPOV Sprouts A New Public Face – As Farmers Protest
    20/10/2011: UPOV Marks 50 Years; Breeders Seek More Enforcement, Civil Society Wants In
    14/10/2011: Trading Knowledge As A Public Good: A Proposal For The WTO
    14/10/2011: Tech Industry Raises Concern Over Protect IP Act
    13/10/2011: US IP Rights Holders Hail New FTAs With Colombia, Panama, Korea
    11/10/2011: Unpunished Human Rights Violations Challenge Right To Food, Activists Say
    10/10/2011: With WTO Stalled, GI Industry Proponents Move To Create Their Own Register
    14/09/2011: South Africa Conference On IP And Innovation
    14/09/2011: Pharma Executive To Head Gates’ Global Health Program
    13/09/2011: WTO Forum Looks At 21st Century Trade Challenges
    10/09/2011: “Washington Declaration” Demands Return Of Public Interest In IP Rights
    07/09/2011: US Chamber Urges More IP Protection As Job Booster; Tech Supporters Disagree
    06/09/2011: Indian Supreme Court To Hear Novartis Challenge To India’s Patent Law
    08/08/2011: Changes At The Top As RIAA Sees “Bright Future”
    08/08/2011: Promoting Caribbean Intellectual Property Law
    20/07/2011: WIPO Calls On Film Industry Stars To Promote Audiovisual Treaty
    19/07/2011: WIPO Takes A Shot At ICANN’s Domain Dispute Reform
    19/07/2011: US Chamber Urges Highest IP Standards In Trans-Pacific Trade Pact
    14/07/2011: Interview With Chief Judge Paul R. Michel On US Patent Reform
    12/07/2011: Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Did US Move Threaten Public Health?
    08/07/2011: UN Body Addresses Problems With IP Rights Within Europe
    30/06/2011: OECD Holds Ground On Strong IP Internet Policy Principles
    28/06/2011: OECD Faces Concerns Over Its Internet Policy Principles
    15/06/2011: An Urgent Letter From Intellectual Property Watch
    13/06/2011: Time For A Positive Agenda, WIPO’s Gurry Tells Copyright Crowd
    13/06/2011: New Brussels Lobbying Group Communia Works For A Stronger Public Domain
    01/06/2011: A2K Standards Proposed for UN Consumer Guidelines
    27/05/2011: IT Industry Sends Mixed Message To The Group Of 8 In Deauville
    17/05/2011: Bill Gates Calls For “Vaccine Decade;” Explains How Patent System Drives Public Health Aid
    16/05/2011: WIPO Goes To Bat For Trademark Owners At ICANN
    15/05/2011: Sounding The Alarm: Return Of US Legislation Against Global “Rogue” Websites
    14/05/2011: Indigenous Peoples Won’t Be “Wished Away” In Traditional Knowledge Treaty Talks