SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments

For IPW Subscribers
A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

Monthly Reporter

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

20/03/2012: WTO Special Session On GI Register Meets This Week
19/03/2012: Debate Heats Up Ahead Of EU Parliament Discussion On ACTA
16/03/2012: Global Business Stands Up For Multilateral Trade At WTO
15/03/2012: Council Of Europe Passes Internet Governance Strategy
15/03/2012: WIPO Design Treaty Proposal Still On Horizon; Key Points Bared
15/03/2012: More Foreigners Find Themselves Targets Of US Copyright Law
15/03/2012: Take The Brussels University Survey On Beliefs About IP
14/03/2012: Ukraine WTO Trademark Dispute Vs. Australia Tests Public Health Measures
14/03/2012: Blocking Of Internet Traffic Common In Europe – EU Report
13/03/2012: US Aims To Boost Its Efforts Against Overseas Infringers
12/03/2012: Costa Rican President Tells ICANN Of Concern Over Internet Restrictions
12/03/2012: Trademark Filings Reach Record High; Industrial Designs Climb As Well
11/03/2012: US Government Scuttles Plan To Share Control Of The Internet
07/03/2012: US Congressman Posts ACTA For Open Debate
06/03/2012: Cybersquatting Cases Reached New Record In 2011, WIPO Reports
05/03/2012: Internet Governance In 2012: Reaching New Heights Or Hitting A Wall
02/03/2012: European Parliament Hears Pitch For ACTA; But Did It Change Minds?
29/02/2012: UN Human Rights Council Rallies On Right To Internet Freedom Of Expression
29/02/2012: ACTA Debated At WTO; Petitions And Letters Fly In Brussels
28/02/2012: Australian Tobacco Law May Head To WTO Dispute As TRIPS Council Meets
26/02/2012: US, WIPO IP Summit In Africa Postponed
24/02/2012: The Pulse Of IP In International Pharma Today
23/02/2012: ACTA Ratification Suspended In Europe, Awaits High Court Opinion
21/02/2012: Special Report: TPP Negotiations To Heat Up In Melbourne Over Patents, Copyright, Medicines
17/02/2012: Public Health In 2012: A Busy Crossroads Of Partnership, Innovation, And Trade
13/02/2012: ACTA Doubts Rampant In Europe; Industry Call For “Reasoned Assessment”
13/02/2012: Global Fund Communications Director Steps Down
13/02/2012: WIPO Offers Dispute Services For Objections To New TLDs At ICANN
13/02/2012: Ideas Offered For IP And Genetic Resources In WIPO Committee
12/02/2012: US, WIPO Training Programme On IP Rights In Africa Comes Under Fire
07/02/2012: Groups Call On Congress To Step Back From SOPA-Style Legislation
04/02/2012: WIPO: ISP-Trademark Meeting Agreed; Industrial Design Treaty, Country Names Still On Table
03/02/2012: Tell WIPO What You Think!
01/02/2012: Discussion Of Treaty On Industrial Designs, Role Of ISPs Resumed At WIPO
31/01/2012: New Internet Domain Process Off To Smooth Start, ICANN Says
30/01/2012: Geographical Indications Register Gains Ground Outside WTO
30/01/2012: “Politics Of Intellectual Property” Looks At The National Level
28/01/2012: WHO Board Plan For Fake Medicines Mechanism Excludes Trade And IP
27/01/2012: Most EU Members Sign ACTA; SOPA-Style Protests Building
26/01/2012: Officials, Industry Discuss IPR In Relation To Economy And Society
25/01/2012: ICC’s 2012 IP Roadmap Lays Out Key Policy Issues
25/01/2012: Obama Announces New Trade Enforcement Unit With IP Focus
23/01/2012: ITU In “Urgent” Meeting On Global Spectrum As New Devices Gobble It Up
23/01/2012: Subscriber Alert: WHO Board Considers Key Reform Paper
23/01/2012: SOPA, Piracy, Pharmaceuticals May Dominate US IP Policy Discussions In 2012
20/01/2012: US Senate Postpones PIPA Vote; EU Commissioner Joined Opposition
19/01/2012: FAQ: What SOPA Would Mean To You
19/01/2012: Book On “Idea Rights” Gives Clear, “Non-Ownership” Explanation Of IP Law
19/01/2012: Year Ahead: Busy Copyright Schedule As Europe Seeks Economic Recovery
18/01/2012: EU Innovation Commissioner Presents Horizon 2020