SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments

For IPW Subscribers
A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

Monthly Reporter

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


IP Law

14/07/2011: Interview With Chief Judge Paul R. Michel On US Patent Reform
13/07/2011: Inside Views: Does Introduction Of A Utility Model Protection Regime Make Sense In India?
24/06/2011: Special Report: A Quick Summary Of The New US Supreme Court Decisions On Patents
15/06/2011: EFF: Judge Dismisses Copyright “Troll” Case
15/06/2011: An Urgent Letter From Intellectual Property Watch
31/05/2011: Outgoing US Commerce Chief Backs House Patent Reform Bill, Nearly
17/05/2011: WIPO Members Discuss Patent Quality, Public Health, Exceptions
15/05/2011: Sounding The Alarm: Return Of US Legislation Against Global “Rogue” Websites
06/05/2011: Inside Views: Trading’s End: Is ACTA The Leading Edge Of A Protectionist Wave?
30/03/2011: US Farmers Sue Monsanto Over GMO Patents, Demand Right To Conventional Crops
23/03/2011: Google, Authors, Will Need To Rethink Digital Book Settlement
21/03/2011: Briefs Filed In Supreme Court Case On Lowering Patent Validity Test
21/03/2011: Microsoft Asserts Patents In E-Readers, Tablets
17/03/2011: US Court Rulings May End Plague of False Patent Marking Suits
16/03/2011: Would US Senate Patent Reform Bill Harmonise US Law With The World?
15/03/2011: Copyright System Must “Adapt Or Perish,” WIPO Director Says
12/03/2011: EU Takes Actions On Patent Law; ACTA May See Legal Fight
11/03/2011: Inside Views: Caribbean IP: Establishing An Arbitral Tribunal For The Region
01/03/2011: Are The Stars Aligned For US Patent Reform This Year?
16/01/2011: Inside Views: Fair Usage In Caribbean Intellectual Property
12/01/2011: US Supreme Court Expected To Weaken Patent Validity
07/01/2011: The Top Legal IP Issues In The United States In 2011
30/12/2010: Top IP-Watch Stories Of 2010: Copyright Fights, ACTA, Medicines Access
06/12/2010: ‘Final Final’ ACTA Text Published; More Discussion Ahead For EU
30/10/2010: Inside Views: A Primer On Spotting IP Issues Associated with Social Media Websites and Content
26/10/2010: IP And Competition Policy Can Help Each Other, Officials Say
25/10/2010: European Ruling Could Reshape Collective Copyright Levy System
19/10/2010: US Attorney General In China Talks Tough, Blurs Line, On IP
13/10/2010: Sign Up For Email Alerts Of IP-Watch Burbles!
02/10/2010: An Eventful Week For IP Policymaking In The United States
27/09/2010: The Realities Of Traditional Knowledge And Patents in India
18/09/2010: US Companies, Officials Discuss Policies To Boost IP Value, Cut Costs
16/09/2010: Economists Report Empirical Evidence Of TRIPS Impact On Developing Countries
09/08/2010: Intellectual Property Watch Thanks You For Your Support
28/07/2010: US Jobs Bill Would Restrict Foreign Access To Patent Applications
28/07/2010: Reminder: Urgent Call To Support Intellectual Property Watch
15/07/2010: Brazil’s Discussion On Copyright Law Reform – Response To The Digital Era?
12/07/2010: Panel: Copyright Needed In Music, But Should Benefit Musicians
05/07/2010: Help Intellectual Property Watch!
01/07/2010: US Economist: US Financial Patents Litigation-Prone; Low Quality Makes Them Easy Targets
29/06/2010: In Bilski Decision, US Supreme Court Adopts Tough But Vague Test for Business Method Patents
11/06/2010: FIFA, Vuvuzelas And Facebook: The Global Trophy Of IP Protection
04/06/2010: Google May Face New Scrutiny For Privacy Violations In Switzerland
01/06/2010: Special Report: The Potential Consequences of Google’s Electronic Book Initiative
21/05/2010: Conference Debates Strategic Patenting, Innovation & Public Health
29/04/2010: Global IP Enforcement Push Impacting Consumer Access, 2010 IP Watchlist Finds
26/04/2010: L’éditeur d’un logiciel open source accuse IBM de concurrence déloyale – IBM demande une analyse
23/04/2010: Shareholders In 3G Mobile Patent Company Seek US Investigation Of Nokia, Ericsson
20/04/2010: Open Source Company Alleges IBM Antitrust; IBM Requests Analysis
08/04/2010: UK Passes Internet Access-Limiting Bill For Alleged IP Infringers