SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

To What Extent Can Global IP Rules Be Responsive To Public Interest Demands? The Case Of The Treaty For The Visually Impaired

To what extent can global intellectual property rules address in an effective manner the needs of the most vulnerable members of society? This is the key question with which member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) are faced as they prepare to meet next week for a diplomatic conference, in Marrakesh, that should result in the adoption of a treaty to facilitate access to copyrighted works by visually impaired persons and persons with print disabilities.


Interview With Tanja Rajić: The Impact Of EU Enlargement On Trademark Practice In Croatia

Ten years after applying for membership, Croatia is finally joining the European Union on 1 July 2013. Tanja Rajić, senior associate at PETOSEVIC, explains how six years of accession negotiations and the adoption of the acquis communautaire have affected intellectual property protection in Croatia and prepared it for becoming a member state.





Latest Comments
  • We in India should not change our policy, speciall... »
  • We in India should not change our policy, speciall... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Inside Views

    03/10/2011: Inside Views: A Response From The Authors Of The Health Impact Fund
    30/09/2011: Inside Views: Clear The Way For SMEs: Lessons From Nairobi
    26/09/2011: Inside Views: Health Impact Fund – Raising Issues Of Distribution, IP Rights And Alliances
    11/08/2011: Inside Views: Alto Funcionário Discute Sobre Renúncia Ao Seu Cargo Na ANVISA, No Brasil, Devido à Política Sobre Patentes
    08/08/2011: Inside Views: Promoting Caribbean Intellectual Property Law
    04/08/2011: Inside Views: Getting The Most Value From Your Patent Claims
    29/07/2011: Inside Views: A Glance At Current Patent Litigation In India
    21/07/2011: Inside Views: Corporate Self-Interest And Strategic Choices: Gilead Licenses To Medicines Patent Pool
    14/07/2011: Inside Views: Interview With Chief Judge Paul R. Michel On US Patent Reform
    13/07/2011: Inside Views: Does Introduction Of A Utility Model Protection Regime Make Sense In India?
    28/06/2011: Inside Views: Amending Canada’s Access To Medicines Regime (CAMR): The New Fate Of Bill C-393
    12/05/2011: Inside Views: Brazil’s Copyright Reform: Are We All Josef K.?
    06/05/2011: Inside Views: Trading’s End: Is ACTA The Leading Edge Of A Protectionist Wave?
    20/04/2011: Inside Views: Plant Breeder’s Rights – A Blessing Or A Curse?
    07/04/2011: Inside Views: Financial Transaction Tax: A Resource For WHO Global Strategy And Plan of Action
    11/03/2011: Inside Views: Caribbean IP: Establishing An Arbitral Tribunal For The Region
    04/03/2011: Inside Views: In Brazil And The IP World, It’s Tropicalization Time!
    25/02/2011: Inside Views: Building A Consensus To Address The Health Threat Posed By Fake Medicines
    17/02/2011: Inside Views: Brazil And The Defence Of Public Health: Do As I Say, Not As I Do
    08/02/2011: Inside Views: Brazil’s Copyright Reform: Schizophrenia?
    16/01/2011: Inside Views: Fair Usage In Caribbean Intellectual Property
    23/12/2010: Inside Views: US Industrial Policies, R&D, And The WTO’s Definition Of Non-Actionable Subsidies
    07/12/2010: Inside Views: Caribbean IP: Ensure Unending Local Protection Of Traditional Knowledge
    03/12/2010: Inside Views: The Next Internet Revolution Will Not Be In English: New Multilingual URLs
    19/11/2010: Inside Views: Making The Case For Responsible Science For A Safe Environment
    12/11/2010: Inside Views: Global Copyright Reform — A View From The South In Response To Lessig
    11/11/2010: Inside Views: A Tale Of A Visually Impaired Reader
    05/11/2010: Inside Views: Sharing US Drug Patents with Neglected Patients: A Scientist’s View
    30/10/2010: Inside Views: A Primer On Spotting IP Issues Associated with Social Media Websites and Content
    28/10/2010: Inside Views: Big Pharma Stranglehold: Thwarting India As Independent Maker Of Blockbuster HIV Drugs?
    22/10/2010: Inside Views: Flexibility In Government Procurement Needed For Developing Countries
    08/10/2010: Inside Views: A Rights-Poor Protocol For Biodiversity Access & Benefit-Sharing
    27/09/2010: Inside Views: The Realities Of Traditional Knowledge And Patents in India
    30/08/2010: Inside Views: The Relationship Between IP, Technology Transfer, and Development
    24/08/2010: Inside Views: Rapport entre propriété intellectuelle, transfert de technologie et développement
    17/08/2010: Inside Views: The Future Of Biotechnology Patents In The European Union
    27/07/2010: Inside Views: US Second Circuit Decision Opens Questions Of Transformative And Fair Use
    15/07/2010: Inside Views: Brazil’s Discussion On Copyright Law Reform – Response To The Digital Era?
    11/06/2010: Inside Views: The Biosimilars Pathway: An Invitation To Litigation
    20/05/2010: Inside Views: WHO’s Precious Matsoso On Public Health, Innovation And Intellectual Property
    03/05/2010: Inside Views: A Prescription For Failure — Health And IP In The Dominican Republic
    29/04/2010: 《国家标准涉及专利的处置规则》最新稿:是不是向前一步?
    08/04/2010: Inside Views: Smooth Criminal Harmonisation — ACTA, EU And IPR Enforcement
    06/04/2010: Inside Views: ITU In A Converging World — Interview With ITU Strategist Alexander Ntoko
    01/04/2010: Inside Views: China’s Latest Draft Disposal Rules For Patents In Standards A Step Forward?
    01/04/2010: Inside Views: Unbiased HIV Patent Pool — A Free-Market, Middle-Income Countries Open Model
    22/03/2010: Inside Views: Forest Group Decision Has Led To Great Rise In Patent Marking Lawsuits
    18/03/2010: Inside Views: The US-Cotton Case — The Truth Behind Brazil’s Cross-Retaliation Against US Intellectual Property
    10/03/2010: Inside Views: Interview With Bill Pollock, Founder Of No Starch Press
    23/12/2009: Inside Views: Copyright Law Reform in Brazil — Anteprojeto or Anti-project?
    Your IP address is 107.20.7.65