SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Analysis: Monkey In The Middle Of Selfie Copyright Dispute

The recent case of a monkey selfie that went viral on the web raised thorny issues of ownership between a (human) photographer and Wikimedia. Two attorneys from Morrison & Foerster sort out the relevant copyright law.


Latest Comments
  • A VPN is a virtual private network, which generall... »
  • Interesting case. I would have hoped for more ela... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >


    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    Inside Views

    18/11/2012: Inside Views: Fixing Canada’s Access to Medicines Regime — Bill C-398
    09/11/2012: Inside Views: EU Health Cooperation — Room For Improvement
    06/11/2012: Inside Views: Sizing Up The “Ill-Conceived” PAIPO Draft Statute
    24/10/2012: Inside Views: In Search of Relevance, Not Solutions: The Truth About ITU’s ‘Patent Roundtable’
    21/09/2012: Inside Views: Medals, Models And Moguls
    19/09/2012: Inside Views: Patently Wrong – The Jury’s Verdict In Apple v. Samsung
    12/09/2012: Inside Views: How To Reboot WIPO
    08/09/2012: Inside Views: The Contributions Of Julian Assange To The Debate On Intellectual Property
    06/08/2012: Inside Views: Form Over Function – The ECJ Rules On Software Copyright
    23/07/2012: Inside Views: Access To Medicines And Intellectual Property In Jordan
    20/06/2012: Inside Views: An Anthem To Ignorance: South Africa’s Case Of Nkosi Sikelel’ iAfrika
    29/05/2012: Inside Views: Golden Oldies? South African High Court Looks At What Is “Traditional”
    10/05/2012: Inside Views: Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation
    12/04/2012: Inside Views: Interview With Vladimir Nika: Enforcing IP Rights In Albania 2010 – 2015
    02/04/2012: Inside Views: WHO / EU “Bad Medicine” Plans: Flaws, Coordination Gaps
    21/03/2012: Inside Views: Nigerian Courts Step Up Against Copyright Piracy: 18 Convicted
    18/03/2012: Inside Views: A NEW South Africa Traditional Knowledge Bill – Sui Generis Protection for TK
    14/03/2012: Inside Views: Intérêt de l’entreprise et choix stratégiques : les licences concédées par Gilead au Medicines Patent Pool
    27/02/2012: Inside Views: ‘Balanced’ Copyright: Not A Magic Solving Word
    20/01/2012: Inside Views: Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old
    13/12/2011: Inside Views: Out Of A Dilemma: Banning The Non-Violation Clause Under TRIPS
    12/12/2011: Inside Views: Brazil’s Leaked Copyright Reform Draft Bill Shows Latest Thinking
    06/12/2011: Inside Views: A Clatch Of Copyright Cases At The Supreme Court of Canada
    14/11/2011: Inside Views: Post-Grant Oppositions Under US Patent Reform
    08/11/2011: Inside Views: The Mad Hatter In Wonderland: South Africa’s New TK Bill
    27/10/2011: Inside Views: Plurilateral Trade Agreements Lack Protections for Users, Intermediaries
    21/10/2011: Inside Views: How To Respond To A Cease & Desist Letter
    18/10/2011: Inside Views: To Stem Infringement, Block Money – Not Information
    14/10/2011: Inside Views: Trade And Access To Medicines: Things The WTO Should Consider
    06/10/2011: Inside Views: South Africa: TK Legislation In The New Tradition
    03/10/2011: Inside Views: A Response From The Authors Of The Health Impact Fund
    30/09/2011: Inside Views: Clear The Way For SMEs: Lessons From Nairobi
    26/09/2011: Inside Views: Health Impact Fund – Raising Issues Of Distribution, IP Rights And Alliances
    11/08/2011: Inside Views: Alto Funcionário Discute Sobre Renúncia Ao Seu Cargo Na ANVISA, No Brasil, Devido à Política Sobre Patentes
    08/08/2011: Inside Views: Promoting Caribbean Intellectual Property Law
    04/08/2011: Inside Views: Getting The Most Value From Your Patent Claims
    29/07/2011: Inside Views: A Glance At Current Patent Litigation In India
    21/07/2011: Inside Views: Corporate Self-Interest And Strategic Choices: Gilead Licenses To Medicines Patent Pool
    14/07/2011: Inside Views: Interview With Chief Judge Paul R. Michel On US Patent Reform
    13/07/2011: Inside Views: Does Introduction Of A Utility Model Protection Regime Make Sense In India?
    28/06/2011: Inside Views: Amending Canada’s Access To Medicines Regime (CAMR): The New Fate Of Bill C-393
    12/05/2011: Inside Views: Brazil’s Copyright Reform: Are We All Josef K.?
    06/05/2011: Inside Views: Trading’s End: Is ACTA The Leading Edge Of A Protectionist Wave?
    20/04/2011: Inside Views: Plant Breeder’s Rights – A Blessing Or A Curse?
    07/04/2011: Inside Views: Financial Transaction Tax: A Resource For WHO Global Strategy And Plan of Action
    11/03/2011: Inside Views: Caribbean IP: Establishing An Arbitral Tribunal For The Region
    04/03/2011: Inside Views: In Brazil And The IP World, It’s Tropicalization Time!
    25/02/2011: Inside Views: Building A Consensus To Address The Health Threat Posed By Fake Medicines
    17/02/2011: Inside Views: Brazil And The Defence Of Public Health: Do As I Say, Not As I Do
    08/02/2011: Inside Views: Brazil’s Copyright Reform: Schizophrenia?
    Your IP address is 54.196.194.141