SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments

For IPW Subscribers
A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

Monthly Reporter

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting

23/01/2012: Government Anti-Piracy Measures Working, Music Industry Says
23/01/2012: SOPA, Piracy, Pharmaceuticals May Dominate US IP Policy Discussions In 2012
20/01/2012: Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old
20/01/2012: US Senate Postpones PIPA Vote; EU Commissioner Joined Opposition
19/01/2012: FAQ: What SOPA Would Mean To You
18/01/2012: Websites Everywhere Dark In Protest Of US Anti-Piracy Legislation
17/01/2012: All Eyes On US Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA): Fate Of Bill Now Unclear
11/01/2012: ICANN Announces New TLD Program Start
10/01/2012: ICANN Says Domain Expansion Won’t Hurt UN, WTO
05/01/2012: NTIA Supports New Domains – Phased In, With Protection
04/01/2012: Dates Set For WIPO Audiovisual Treaty Negotiation In Beijing
04/01/2012: Evidence Sought For UK Study On Digital Copyright Exchange
03/01/2012: Most-Read IP-Watch Posts Of 2011 Tell Story Of International IP Policymaking
21/12/2011: Last Parliament Standing: Europe Final Stronghold Of ACTA Critics
14/12/2011: UN, IMF, WTO, Other Organizations Raise Concern About New Domains
12/12/2011: Inside Views: Brazil’s Leaked Copyright Reform Draft Bill Shows Latest Thinking
12/12/2011: Kroes Details EU No-Disconnect, Open Data Strategies
08/12/2011: Council Of Europe Sees Human Rights Concerns In Internet Restrictions
08/12/2011: ICANN Warned Again In The US On New Internet Domains
08/12/2011: EU Parliament Seminar Looks At Risks Of Outsourcing Policing Of Internet
06/12/2011: Inside Views: A Clatch Of Copyright Cases At The Supreme Court of Canada
05/12/2011: WIPO Sees Progress On Broadcaster Rights, Library Exceptions; Treaty For Blind Readers Slips
05/12/2011: Lines Of Global Enforcement Debate Surface at WIPO Meeting
02/12/2011: WIPO To Negotiate Audiovisual Treaty In Beijing In Summer 2012
30/11/2011: EU Picks Up Pace On Copyright Licensing, Private Copying, Unitary Patent
25/11/2011: European Court Of Justice Rules Out Mandatory Filtering Systems At Intermediaries
22/11/2011: “Marathon” WIPO Copyright Session Opens With Hopes, Treaty Prospects
21/11/2011: EU’s Kroes Calls For New Thinking On Copyright System
20/11/2011: Filtering and Blocking Closer To The Core Of The Internet?
16/11/2011: Barrage Of Doubts Voiced On US Internet Piracy Bill
13/11/2011: 33 North American Institutions Sign Declaration On Open Access
05/11/2011: US Secretary Clinton: No Contradiction In Online Enforcement, Free Speech
03/11/2011: Competing Industry Reports Show Economic Contributions Of Copyright, Fair Use
02/11/2011: Amid Global Effort To Fill Internet Policy Gaps, India Proposes New UN Body
02/11/2011: WIPO Talks On Industrial Design Treaty, Internet Intermediaries, Suspended Till 2012
01/11/2011: US Copyright Office Issues Analysis Of Mass Digitisation Of Books
27/10/2011: Controversial US Bill Targeting “Rogue Websites” Introduced In US Congress
25/10/2011: US Copyright Office Releases Priorities For Next Two Years
25/10/2011: US To Seek Bids To Manage Key Aspect Of The Internet
19/10/2011: Copyright Infrastructure In The Digital Age: Raising Awareness At WIPO
18/10/2011: Inside Views: To Stem Infringement, Block Money – Not Information
14/10/2011: Trading Knowledge As A Public Good: A Proposal For The WTO
14/10/2011: Tech Industry Raises Concern Over Protect IP Act
10/10/2011: German Police Used Trojan Horses In Investigations
06/10/2011: A US Look At The New Digital Diplomacy
03/10/2011: Proposal For New UN Internet Governance Body Meets Resistance
30/09/2011: Inside Views: Clear The Way For SMEs: Lessons From Nairobi
30/09/2011: In Boost To Multilateral System And WIPO, Audiovisual Treaty Set For 2012 Completion
27/09/2011: Internet Governance Forum Faces Challenges As UN Hears Proposals For New Bodies
22/09/2011: A Call To Update Trade Policy Apps In The Internet Era