SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Features

    24/05/2013: World Health Assembly: Groups Seek To Return Focus To ‘Broken’ Medical R&D System
    22/05/2013: Special Report: Big Trading Blocs Moving At Breakneck Pace To Raise Free Trade Standards
    20/05/2013: Conference On Journalism And Health Looks At WHA Issues
    20/05/2013: After Court Ruling, US Still In Disarray On Software Patents
    17/05/2013: WIPO Programmes Seek To Bridge IP And Climate Change, Global Health
    17/05/2013: World Health Assembly: R&D, NCDs, Pandemics Top Agenda
    13/05/2013: WIPO Committee On Development This Week: North-South Differences
    07/05/2013: Common Market For Eastern And Southern Africa (COMESA) Drafts IP Policy
    03/05/2013: Shippers Becoming Anti-Counterfeiting Target; Europe Takes Other Measures
    01/05/2013: Experts Offer Perspectives On R&D Policies In The Public Health Domain
    25/04/2013: WIPO Demonstrates 3D Printing: Making The Impossible Possible
    25/04/2013: Anti-Counterfeiters Focus On Organised Crime, Softer Public Message
    23/04/2013: Rethinking The Role Of Innovation In The Green Technologies Context
    22/04/2013: Curbing Vaccine Costs Key To Extending Global Immunisation Reach
    22/04/2013: Mixed Reactions Among Participants In WIPO Talks On Treaty For The Blind
    20/04/2013: In UN Talks On Treaty For The Blind, Concern About Heavy Focus On Rightholders’ Interests
    19/04/2013: UN Economic Commission For Europe Looks At Innovation
    17/04/2013: Greek Gene Bank’s Struggle Indicative Of Changing Times
    11/04/2013: Community Right To Access Unpublished Works Trumps Moral Rights Of Heir, Argentine Court Says
    09/04/2013: WIPO Hails India’s Accession To Trademark System; India Advocates Balance
    05/04/2013: African Regional Plant Variety Protection Draft Legislation Raises Protest
    01/04/2013: Novartis Loses Patent Bid: Lessons From India’s 3(d) Experience
    28/03/2013: East African Community Doubles Efforts To Boost Local Drug Production
    28/03/2013: Royalty-Setting For Standard Essential Patents Might Be Balanced By Prospect Of Injunction, Speakers Say
    25/03/2013: Diverging Views On IPR Protection Needs In Africa Emerge At IP Workshop
    23/03/2013: US Supreme Court To Hear Arguments On Pay-For-Delay Drug Deals
    22/03/2013: Conference Addresses Current Issues For Corporate IP Counsel
    21/03/2013: Global Pharma Companies See Battle For Survival In Pakistan
    19/03/2013: Samsung Lawyer Assesses IP Legal Battle With Apple
    18/03/2013: Practitioners Discuss Interconnection Between Professional Sports And IP
    18/03/2013: African Ministers Focus On IP Role In Innovation For Development; Less On Flexibilities
    14/03/2013: Interpol, Pharma Join Hands Against The Crime Of Fake Pharmaceuticals
    14/03/2013: US Perspectives: US Tries Gentler Copyright Enforcement
    11/03/2013: Swiss Perspectives On The Success Of Its National Innovation Model
    06/03/2013: Academics Criticise Handling Of Cultural Diversity, Traditional Knowledge At International Level
    05/03/2013: “Works For Hire” A Key Issue As Music Stars Begin Terminating Copyright Transfers
    05/03/2013: Monsanto v. Bowman: Stocktaking After Supreme Court Hearings
    04/03/2013: Patent Pool-ViiV Collaboration On Paediatric HIV Sparks Reactions, Hope
    28/02/2013: Global Health Giants, Trade Deals, And IP Play Central Role In 2013 Public Health Policy
    27/02/2013: European Copyright Reform On Slow Track, Observers Say
    21/02/2013: WIPO Treaty For The Blind: Rightsholders Seek Safeguards, Civil Society Seeks Real Access
    18/02/2013: Patent Outsourcing May Harm US Economy
    18/02/2013: Monsanto, Myriad: Two US Legal Cases Shaking Biotech Industries
    16/02/2013: Indian Users’ Perspective On WIPO Negotiations On Treaty For Visually Impaired
    14/02/2013: EU Unitary Patent And Court Are Here. Or Are They?
    13/02/2013: Event Explains Partnerships In Natural Products Research Through Thai Experience With Novartis
    12/02/2013: Year Ahead In IP, Biotech, Biodiversity: A Trio Fuelling Debates, Opportunities In 2013
    08/02/2013: Genetic Origin In Food And Agriculture Difficult To Identify, Say Seed Treaty Officials
    08/02/2013: Fate Of Google Book Search Still To Come, Expert Says
    05/02/2013: Expiring GMO Patents Raise Regulatory Issues; Private Sector Takes Measures
    Your IP address is 184.72.184.104