SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments

For IPW Subscribers
A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

Monthly Reporter

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


Environment

29/11/2010: UN Climate Change Talks Start With Little Faith From Observers
29/11/2010: UN Biodiversity Convention Seeks Expedited Entry Into Force Of Benefit-Sharing Protocol
29/10/2010: Compromise UN Protocol Treaty Against Biopiracy Adopted In Japan
29/10/2010: TRIPS Council Discusses Efficacy Of ACTA, Public Health Amendment
27/10/2010: Ministers Arrive To Help Reach Outcome At UN Convention On Biodiversity
26/10/2010: Biodiversity Benefit-Sharing Treaty Negotiators Tackle New Text As Clock Ticks
26/10/2010: Change Coming To Quiet UN Plant Variety Protection Agency?
26/10/2010: Climate-Ready Crop Patents Present Danger For Biodiversity, Group Says
24/10/2010: Negotiators Persist On Biodiversity Benefit-Sharing Treaty Despite Slipping Deadlines
23/10/2010: New Draft Biodiversity Treaty Text Shows Much Work Remains; Co-Chairs Hopeful
22/10/2010: Biodiversity Negotiators Move Treaty Text Forward; Deadline Pushed To Monday
21/10/2010: Indigenous Groups Allege Canadian Obstructionism To Biodiversity ABS Protocol
19/10/2010: Delegates See UN Protocol Against Biopiracy Within Reach
15/10/2010: As Negotiators Launch Talks On Biodiversity, Industry Requests IP Protection
13/10/2010: Sign Up For Email Alerts Of IP-Watch Burbles!
08/10/2010: Inside Views: A Rights-Poor Protocol For Biodiversity Access & Benefit-Sharing
30/09/2010: Study Shows Climate Change Innovation Concentrated In Few Nations
28/09/2010: Burdened With Brackets, Biodiversity ABS Protocol Needs Political Will To Survive
27/09/2010: Echoes Of Global Patent Wars At WIPO Annual General Assembly
03/09/2010: Human Survival Depends On Shared Technology, Says New UN Climate Chief
09/08/2010: Intellectual Property Watch Thanks You For Your Support
28/07/2010: Reminder: Urgent Call To Support Intellectual Property Watch
21/07/2010: International Experts See Backswing In Pendulum Of Biological Patenting
20/07/2010: Consensus On Binding Biodiversity Agreement Elusive, To Reconvene in September
16/07/2010: Hopes Fading For Concluding Biodiversity Access And Benefit Sharing Negotiations?
16/07/2010: OECD Sees New Angle On Innovation For Growth, Social Challenges
13/07/2010: New Climate Technologies Rarely Reaching Developing Countries, Panel Says
05/07/2010: Help Intellectual Property Watch!
07/06/2010: Public Gets A Taste Of WIPO, Policy Debate On IP And Environment
02/06/2010: WIPO To Open Its Doors To Public For First Time Ever
12/05/2010: Biotechnology Consultant To Lead WIPO Global Challenges Division
03/05/2010: WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee Opens With Hope For Text-Based Talks
21/04/2010: Biodiversity: Bountiful Source For Cosmetics, But Needs Respect, Group Says
06/04/2010: UN Claims Victory In Biodiversity Talks, But Outcome Not Certain
28/03/2010: British Official To Lead UPOV As Civil Society Interest Rises
22/03/2010: Biodiversity Negotiators Seek To Finalise Draft Access, Benefit-Sharing Regime
09/03/2010: FAO Conference Draws Ire From Civil Society; Industry Satisfied By Event
11/02/2010: Knowledge Access Blooms In The Desert: Egypt’s Fragile Stake In IP
09/02/2010: Informe de la ONU: las políticas mundiales de PI no prestan atención a los derechos de los indígenas
28/01/2010: Year Ahead: Key Year For Biodiversity, Environment, Food Security, Traditional Knowledge
26/01/2010: 2010 US Industry Group Priorities: Patent Reform, USPTO Funds, Genes, Green Tech
22/01/2010: Biodiversity ‘EcoChic’ At UN: “Organic, Fair Trade, And Damn Sexy”
14/01/2010: UN Report: Indigenous Rights Ignored In Global IP Policy
19/12/2009: IP References Left Out Of Last-Minute, Weak Global Climate Deal In Copenhagen
16/12/2009: Copenhagen Meeting: Third Tech Transfer Draft May Go To Ministers, With IP
14/12/2009: Tough Talks On IP In Technology Paper At Copenhagen; No Mention In Latest Draft
10/12/2009: Draft Copenhagen Text On IP Issues Now Available
09/12/2009: IP Issues May Go To ‘Higher Political Level’ In Copenhagen Amid Difficulties
02/12/2009: WTO Ends Ministerial With No Agreements, Modest Treatment Of IP
02/12/2009: New Classification Scheme For Clean Energy Patents To Facilitate Technology Transfer