SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments

For IPW Subscribers
A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

Monthly Reporter

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


Developing Country Policy

04/03/2011: In Brazil And The IP World, It’s Tropicalization Time!
17/02/2011: Brazil And The Defence Of Public Health: Do As I Say, Not As I Do
08/02/2011: Inside Views: Brazil’s Copyright Reform: Schizophrenia?
16/01/2011: Inside Views: Fair Usage In Caribbean Intellectual Property
04/01/2011: Patent On AIDS Medicine Denied In India; Seen Unlocking Market
30/12/2010: Top IP-Watch Stories Of 2010: Copyright Fights, ACTA, Medicines Access
17/12/2010: Efforts To Limit Effects Of TRIPS In India Might Not Be Working, Study Says
10/12/2010: Does EU-India FTA Serve Mutual Interests? Policymakers, NGOs Disagree
07/12/2010: Inside Views: Caribbean IP: Ensure Unending Local Protection Of Traditional Knowledge
01/12/2010: World AIDS Day Brings Calls For Legislative Caution, Reform
01/12/2010: Key IP-Related Personnel Changes In UN, National Agencies
19/11/2010: Inside Views: Making The Case For Responsible Science For A Safe Environment
28/10/2010: Inside Views: Big Pharma Stranglehold: Thwarting India As Independent Maker Of Blockbuster HIV Drugs?
22/10/2010: Inside Views: Flexibility In Government Procurement Needed For Developing Countries
22/10/2010: Emerging Economies’ New Initiative On Falsified And Substandard Medicines
20/10/2010: Minister: India Anticipates European Fix To Law Delaying Generics Shipments
13/10/2010: Sign Up For Email Alerts Of IP-Watch Burbles!
27/09/2010: The Realities Of Traditional Knowledge And Patents in India
12/09/2010: African Traditional Knowledge And Folklore Given IP Protection Despite Warning Of TK Commodification
03/09/2010: Lack Of Transparency In EU-India FTA Talks Spurs Requests For Halt
26/08/2010: Rights Holders Launch Initiative To Protect Content In Africa
24/08/2010: Rapport entre propriété intellectuelle, transfert de technologie et développement
09/08/2010: Intellectual Property Watch Thanks You For Your Support
02/08/2010: Coverage Of Anti-Counterfeit Policy Debate Varies Widely Across Global Media
02/08/2010: 中国防火长城:网络审查何时会违反世贸组织规则?
28/07/2010: The Great Firewall of China: When Does Online Censorship Violate WTO Rules?
28/07/2010: Reminder: Urgent Call To Support Intellectual Property Watch
28/07/2010: Global AIDS Conference Sees Pledge Of Access, Call For Funding; IP Rights Discussed
15/07/2010: Brazil’s Discussion On Copyright Law Reform – Response To The Digital Era?
05/07/2010: Help Intellectual Property Watch!
11/06/2010: FIFA, Vuvuzelas And Facebook: The Global Trophy Of IP Protection
08/06/2010: New Rwanda IP Policy Taps Information For Development
03/06/2010: As WTO Reviews China, EU, US Criticise Its Policy On Innovation, IP Rights
01/06/2010: US, China Weaving Closer Trade and IP Cooperation; Focus On Innovation
31/05/2010: Drug Access Waiver Debate Looms For June TRIPS Council Meeting
27/05/2010: Knowledge-Building, Strong National Policies Essential For Development, Authors Say
13/05/2010: Brazilian Generic Drug Registration Sets Standard For ‘Pipeline’ Patents
29/04/2010: 《国家标准涉及专利的处置规则》最新稿:是不是向前一步?
27/04/2010: EU-India Trade Talks Resume Under Cloud Of Concern For Public Health
26/04/2010: El Ecuador concede primera licencia obligatoria para medicamentos contra el VIH/SIDA
22/04/2010: Ecuador Grants First Compulsory Licence, For HIV/AIDS Drug
22/04/2010: Free Software Used To Fight Piracy, Broaden Knowledge Access In Ecuador
06/04/2010: Risk Of Wrongful Medicines Seizures Seen In EU-Central America Trade Deal
01/04/2010: China’s Latest Draft Disposal Rules For Patents In Standards: A Step Forward?
22/03/2010: China Tells WTO: Obligations Fulfilled On IP Dispute Case
17/03/2010: Public Health Policy In 2010: Research Funding And Regulations
16/03/2010: Le Conseil des ADPIC envisage la tenue d’un atelier sur un amendement relatif à la santé publique
11/03/2010: Indian Civil Society Raises Concerns Over US Industry-Sponsored IP Summits
10/03/2010: Regards de deux cinéastes africains sur la créativité et le droit d’auteur
01/03/2010: Efficacy Of TRIPS Public Health Amendment In Question At WTO