SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments

For IPW Subscribers
A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

Monthly Reporter

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


Author Archive

10/12/2010: Does EU-India FTA Serve Mutual Interests? Policymakers, NGOs Disagree
09/12/2010: Uproar Over Government-Only Internet Governance Forum
09/12/2010: What If There Were An Application For Dot Wikileaks?
06/12/2010: ‘Final Final’ ACTA Text Published; More Discussion Ahead For EU
04/11/2010: Controversy Over New IGF Mandate, UN Role In Internet Governance
27/10/2010: UN And Internet Governance, Next Four Years: Better Cooperation Or Bigger Role?
22/09/2010: Special Report: Global Internet Governance Work At A Turning Point
08/09/2010: European Commission Tells Parliament ACTA Must Be Minimal
08/09/2010: Treaty Negotiators Turn To “ACTA Lite” In Hopes Of Closure
03/09/2010: Lack Of Transparency In EU-India FTA Talks Spurs Requests For Halt
21/07/2010: International Experts See Backswing In Pendulum Of Biological Patenting
10/07/2010: US Rightsholders Seek Narrower Scope Of ACTA, Clarity On Trademark Infringement Vs. Counterfeiting
02/07/2010: ACTA Negotiators Vow To Mesh With National-Level Rights; Withhold New Text
30/06/2010: ACTA Risks Long-Term Damage To Democratic Public Policymaking, NGOs Say
29/06/2010: Dérégler l’horloge d’ACTA
26/06/2010: Scope Of Anti-Counterfeiting Agreement Again A Big Issue In Round Nine
23/06/2010: More Delay To ICANN Introduction Of New Internet Domains?
07/06/2010: Council Of Europe Wants In On ICANN Government Body
21/05/2010: Conference Debates Strategic Patenting, Innovation & Public Health
05/05/2010: Indian Official: ACTA Out Of Sync With TRIPS and Public Health
27/04/2010: EU-India Trade Talks Resume Under Cloud Of Concern For Public Health
24/04/2010: Medicrime: Another Anti-Counterfeiting Convention Emerges In Europe
19/04/2010: Negotiators: ACTA Text To Be Public This Week
11/04/2010: Public ACTA Declaration Open For Signature
07/04/2010: Europe Learns The Truth(s) About ACTA
29/03/2010: Leaked ACTA Text Shows Possible Contradictions With National Laws
22/03/2010: EU To Request Publication Of ACTA Documents To Stop “Rumours”; Civil Society Meeting Planned
02/03/2010: Court Finds German Data Retention Law Unconstitutional
18/02/2010: ACTA Negotiators: Maximal Protection Proposals Unlikely In Final Text
12/02/2010: Year Ahead: Reforming Global IP Systems – Trends In A2K In 2010
09/02/2010: Droit d’auteur 2010 : entre une application modèle et des limitations plus strictes
02/02/2010: Year Ahead Copyright 2010: Between An Enforcement “Gold Standard” And Stronger Limitations
15/01/2010: Internet Governance 2010: Future Of The IGF, Competition Among Institutions
21/12/2009: ACTA May Prompt Quick Restart To EU Harmonisation Of Criminal Enforcement Of IP
06/12/2009: Microsoft Drafts Consumers In Fight Against Software Piracy: Carrot And Stick
24/11/2009: One (Almost) Happy Multi-stakeholder Family At The Annual Internet Governance Forum
01/11/2009: ICANN Gives Green Light To .中国, .рф, .إمارات , But No Timeline For New Top-Level Domains
15/10/2009: European Union Prepares A New Intellectual Property Rights Strategy
09/10/2009: Council Of Europe Weighs Future; Drafts Counterfeit Medicines Convention
01/10/2009: Global Oversight For Internet; US Role In Core Infrastructure Unchanged
29/09/2009: ICANN’s New US Contract And New Top Level Domains – It’s Not Over
12/09/2009: 20,000 March In Berlin As Protests Erupt Against European Surveillance
21/08/2009: Indian High Court Rejects Bayer Complaint For Patent Linkage
09/07/2009: G8: Amid Talks Of Climate, Economy, Food And Health Lies IP & Innovation
06/07/2009: Special Report – ICANN: New CEO, New Government Role, Accelerated International Domains
19/06/2009: Germany Builds Infrastructure To Block The Internet
12/06/2009: Conseil de l’Europe : l’accès à l’internet est un droit fondamental
08/06/2009: Council Of Europe: Access To Internet Is A Fundamental Right
06/06/2009: New Top Level Internet Domains – To Be Or Not To Be?
28/04/2009: 2009 World Telecom Policy Forum: All About The ITU Mandate