SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments

For IPW Subscribers
A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

Monthly Reporter

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


Author Archive

19/10/2008: Governments, Financial Stakeholders Meet On Policy For IP As Collateral
09/10/2008: Intellectual Property And Access Can Co-Exist, US Rightsholders Say
08/10/2008: US Government Seeking IP Law Experts; Signs Work-Sharing Deals
02/10/2008: Economic Crisis Sends IP Owners (And Their Lawyers) Looking For Protection
01/10/2008: US Congress Hastens Through Flurry Of IP Legislation Before Departure
26/09/2008: Biotech, Pharma Industries To Target IP Protection Legislation, Patent Reform
15/09/2008: Industry Still Wary Of ICANN Plan For New Top-Level Internet Domains
11/09/2008: US IP Industry Group Pushes ‘Green’ Patents; Adopts Resolution On Compulsory Licences
10/09/2008: US Judge: US Patent Law Destabilising; ‘Right To Patent’ Under Attack
10/09/2008: Top IP-Owning Nations Claim Faster Patent Processing; Near Harmonisation Deal
05/09/2008: US Presidential Candidates Prioritise IP Issues But Diverge On Details
24/07/2008: US Patent Office Conducts Tour On Industrial Design Protection
17/07/2008: New Rules On Generic Biological Medicines Under US Congressional Debate
12/06/2008: Music Performers In US Policy Fight For Payment From Broadcasters
11/06/2008: Panelists: Balance Needed Between Antitrust Law, Patent Quality
30/05/2008: UNCITRAL Lays Groundwork For Policy On IP Assets And Financing
20/05/2008: UNCITRAL Begins Debate On Harmonising Secured Financing, IP Laws
16/05/2008: Bush Administration Presses On For Patent Reform Bill This Year
29/04/2008: UN Agency To Address Link Between IP Assets And Financial Securities
04/04/2008: USTR Plans Another Year Of Elevating IP Protection With Trading Partners
01/04/2008: New National-Level Programmes Echo WIPO Patent Treaty
28/03/2008: Industry Losing Faith In WIPO; Debates US WTO Cases Against China
14/03/2008: US Net Neutrality Debate Has Global Governance Implications
04/03/2008: Business, Governments See Momentum For ACTA, But EU Snags
06/02/2008: US Fiscal 2009 Proposed Budget Shows IP Enforcement A Priority
06/02/2008: US Patent Reform Legislation On Bumpy Road To Completion
17/12/2007: China, US Hold High-Level Discussions On IP Issues
05/12/2007: Film Industry Touts ISP Partners In Filtering Online Content
29/11/2007: EU To Publish Online Content Rule As Industry Launches IP Standard
13/11/2007: Developed Countries Close Some Gaps Between Patent Systems
09/11/2007: US, EU, Japan To Sign Understanding On Patent Applications
08/11/2007: US Lawmakers Seek To Fuel International IP Enforcement Activities
24/10/2007: Top Economies To Negotiate Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Pact
14/09/2007: Trademark Owners Take On Internet Search Engines
12/09/2007: WIPO’s Gurry Details Efforts On International Patent Needs