Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Summer Interns

IP-Watch interns talk about their Geneva experience in summer 2013. 2:42.

Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

The Politicization Of The US Patent System

The Washington Post story, How patent reform’s fraught politics have left USPTO still without a boss (July 30), is a vivid account of how patent reform has divided the US economy, preempting a possible replacement for David Kappos who stepped down 18 months ago. The division is even bigger than portrayed. Universities have lined up en masse to oppose reform, while main street businesses that merely use technology argue for reform. Reminiscent of the partisan divide that has paralyzed US politics, this struggle crosses party lines and extends well beyond the usual inter-industry debates. Framed in terms of combating patent trolls through technical legal fixes, there lurks a broader economic concern – to what extent ordinary retailers, bank, restaurants, local banks, motels, realtors, and travel agents should bear the burden of defending against patents as a cost of doing business.

Latest Comments
  • So this is how we mankind will become extinct? No ... »
  • 'Business methods were generally not patentable in... »

  • For IPW Subscribers

    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >

    Author Archive

    05/01/2011: IP & Traditional Cultural Expressions: An Unnatural Alliance?
    11/12/2010: WIPO Members Move To Detailed Talks Toward Folklore Treaty
    07/12/2010: WHO To Define Traditional Medicines Standards
    06/12/2010: WTO Session On GIs, Part Of Doha “Final Countdown”
    06/12/2010: Officials Work To Advance WIPO Treaty To Protect Biological, Traditional Resources
    06/12/2010: WHO Members Again Attempt Global Plan Against Pandemics
    03/12/2010: Studies Inform WIPO Enforcement Meeting As Development Issues Debated
    01/12/2010: World AIDS Day Brings Calls For Legislative Caution, Reform
    01/12/2010: Key IP-Related Personnel Changes In UN, National Agencies
    22/11/2010: Should WIPO Lead Creation Of A Global Repertoire Database?
    22/11/2010: Global Copyright Licensing Doubts And What To Do About Them
    16/11/2010: Final ACTA Text Released
    15/11/2010: WIPO Copyright Committee Agrees To Extra Time On Visually Impaired Access
    12/11/2010: WIPO Copyright Committee In Fight To Overcome Differences On Exceptions, Limitations
    10/11/2010: IFPMA Names President, New Members, R&D Commitments
    10/11/2010: Journalism Professor To Lead UK Review Of IP & Growth
    09/11/2010: EU Leak On ACTA Shows Path To Completion
    09/11/2010: Panellists: Copyright Law’s ‘Byzantine Maze’ Stalling New Business Models
    05/11/2010: Lessig Calls For WIPO To Lead Overhaul Of Copyright System
    03/11/2010: US Election Brings IP Uncertainty
    01/11/2010: First Committee On WIPO Standards Ends In Vote For Suspension
    29/10/2010: TRIPS Council Discusses Efficacy Of ACTA, Public Health Amendment
    26/10/2010: Food Security Rests On Wild Plant Genetic Diversity, Says UN
    26/10/2010: Change Coming To Quiet UN Plant Variety Protection Agency?
    26/10/2010: IP And Competition Policy Can Help Each Other, Officials Say
    22/10/2010: Emerging Economies’ New Initiative On Falsified And Substandard Medicines
    21/10/2010: Draft Report Of Plant Variety Protection Council Now Available
    20/10/2010: Minister: India Anticipates European Fix To Law Delaying Generics Shipments
    20/10/2010: Copyright Industry Makes Pitch For Economic Benefit Of Anti-Piracy In Developing Countries
    19/10/2010: Medicines Patent Pool Seeks Business Director
    19/10/2010: WHO Moves IP, Innovation Out Of Director General’s Office
    16/10/2010: WIPO Returns To Substantive Patent Law Talks After 5 Years, With Balance
    15/10/2010: WIPO Patent Committee Chair’s Text Shows Possible Future Work
    14/10/2010: WIPO Members Search For A Negotiating Agenda On Patent Law
    12/10/2010: Near-Finished Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Pact Could Have Broad Reach
    06/10/2010: Latest ACTA Text Now Available
    06/10/2010: ACTA Text Will Be Released Today At 16:00
    04/10/2010: ACTA: No More Negotiating Rounds Planned; Latest Text To Be Released
    01/10/2010: First Patent Holder Grants Licences To UNITAID
    30/09/2010: Study Shows Climate Change Innovation Concentrated In Few Nations
    28/09/2010: Chan Denies Pharma Influence As WHO Review Proceeds
    28/09/2010: Internet Access And Human Rights Highlighted Alongside UN Human Rights Council
    25/09/2010: ACTA Negotiators Still Aiming For Agreement By Year’s End
    24/09/2010: Civil Society Fights For Participation As ACTA Counter To WIPO Rises
    24/09/2010: USPTO Director David Kappos Speaks On Need For IP Cooperation
    20/09/2010: Musician Stevie Wonder Just Calls On WIPO To Improve Books Access
    19/09/2010: IP “Authorities” Meet To Discuss IP Infrastructure, Collaboration
    16/09/2010: Consultations On WTO Drug Transit Case Continue
    16/09/2010: Economists Report Empirical Evidence Of TRIPS Impact On Developing Countries
    16/09/2010: High Copyright Transaction Costs Cause “Friction,” Google Economist Tells WIPO
    Your IP address is