SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

To What Extent Can Global IP Rules Be Responsive To Public Interest Demands? The Case Of The Treaty For The Visually Impaired

To what extent can global intellectual property rules address in an effective manner the needs of the most vulnerable members of society? This is the key question with which member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) are faced as they prepare to meet next week for a diplomatic conference, in Marrakesh, that should result in the adoption of a treaty to facilitate access to copyrighted works by visually impaired persons and persons with print disabilities.


Interview With Tanja Rajić: The Impact Of EU Enlargement On Trademark Practice In Croatia

Ten years after applying for membership, Croatia is finally joining the European Union on 1 July 2013. Tanja Rajić, senior associate at PETOSEVIC, explains how six years of accession negotiations and the adoption of the acquis communautaire have affected intellectual property protection in Croatia and prepared it for becoming a member state.





Latest Comments
  • We've taken a detailed look at the Myriad decision... »
  • “INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY BLUEPRINT 2014-2020”by Jeon... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    EU Picks Up Pace On Copyright Licensing, Private Copying, Unitary Patent

    Published on 30 November 2011 @ 8:55 pm

    By for Intellectual Property Watch

    European efforts to resolve three vexing intellectual property issues – copyright licensing, private copying levies and a unified system for granting and litigating patents – are gaining pace in the public and private sectors and could bear fruit next year.

    One of the most intractable issues so far has been how to streamline licensing of copyrighted content online and off.

    One potential solution, according to the May 2011 UK Hargreaves Review of Intellectual Property and Growth (IPW, European Policy, 31 August 2011) is the creation of a “Digital Copyright Exchange” (DCE), a network of databases offering a common platform for rights licensing. On 22 November, UK Business Secretary Vince Cable appointed former Office of Communications Deputy Chairman Richard Hooper to look into its feasibility.

    A DCE could lower licensing costs and make it easier for consumers to access copyrighted material, Cable said. A “global first,” it could allow rights owners to determine the terms on which their works are to be made available for others to use and let consumers find rights holders quickly for licensing or investment deals, he said. But “the solutions are not straightforward,” he said.

    Hooper said he would start by asking people across and outside the creative sector what licensing barriers they face and then try to produce “appropriate industry-led solutions” that respond to Hargreaves’ vision. His report to the government is due in summer 2012.

    The feasibility study will not “unleash the potential for the market for trading in rights in digital content” but it is a step in the right direction, UK digital media lawyer Laurence Kaye wrote on his blog. Rights exchanges are already developing in the audiovisual, published and other creative industries, he said. What’s missing is the “glue” that makes them all speak to each so rights can be traded on a machine-to-machine basis, he said.

    The European Commission is also trying to revamp copyright licensing. Its 13 July 2011 “green paper” on the opportunities and challenges of a digital single market for online distribution of audiovisual works sought input , among other things, on policy and regulatory options for simplifying rights clearances across borders while ensuring rights holders are paid.

    The Commission has not yet posted the responses to the consultation, which ended 18 November, but the Association of Commercial Television in Europe published its comment. Among other things, it urged the EC to consider the “over-arching need to respect” broadcasters’ contractual freedom to distribute their content. No transfrontier barriers exist to acquisition of audiovisual rights, it said.

    Many commercial broadcasters belong to the Linked Content Coalition, ACT said. That initiative, by the European Publishers Council, seeks to “build the essential technological framework for cross-media 21st Century” rights management, the group’s project plan [pdf] says. Better online rights data management via a common cross-media standardised communication layer will give partners in the supply chain and end-users better rights information, and facilitate the creation of a “voluntary but effective market for automated and semi-automated rights trading,” it said.

    The proposal includes “registries” to manage and deliver data about who manages which rights in which assets; “exchanges” to provide the transactional customer-facing interface between the market and rights users; and the standardised communication layer – metadata, messaging and standard identification – between registries and exchanges to “glue” the system together, the coalition said. Its search for industry participants to fund and deliver the system ends 30 November, with the project expected to launch in January 2012, it said.

    Meanwhile, another industry collaboration saw the 28 November rollout of what’s said to be the first European portal for offline mechanical rights (when a piece of music is reproduced in physical form such as a DVD) licensing. The joint effort by IMPALA, the Independent Music Companies Association, and BUMA/STEMRA, the Dutch Collecting Society for Mechanical Music Rights, is an attempt to make rights licensing and administration more efficient for indie music producers and rights owners, the organisations said. Physical sales accounted for over 70 percent of the market in 2010, they said.

    Another Shot at Fixing Levies

    The Commission has been trying for years to inject some sense into Europe’s balkanised system of imposing fees on digital reproduction equipment such as blank media and computers to compensate rights owners for private copying. On 23 November, Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier proposed appointing former commissioner António Vitorino as a mediator on the contentious issue. The stakeholder discussion, which will lay the groundwork for legislation on private copying levies at EU level, will explore possible ways to harmonise the methodology for imposing the fees and the systems for administering them, he said.

    There are significant differences among EU states as to the devices on which levies are imposed as well as on what is meant by private copying, Barnier said. The European Court of Justice recently held that governments may set levies only when the equipment is likely to be used for private copying (IPW, European Policy, 25 October 2010). Nevertheless, he said, the different regimes continue to create problems for businesses and consumers, to the detriment of rights holders.

    The EC has tried several times to come up with principles on how a levy system should work, Barnier said. The issue is not that creators must receive fair compensation for their work, but that all systems used to collect the payments be organised as efficiently as possible, he said. Discussions are expected to start early next year and be completed by next summer, he said.

    Asked why this discussion should work when earlier ones have not, Barnier’s spokeswoman said that given the commissioner’s clear commitment to legislative action, the EC “is convinced that the concerned parties will double their efforts to ‘build bridges.’” Whether the talks are successful or not, they will be extremely valuable at a time when regulation is contemplated, she said. Any future proposal must be grounded on a “deep and up to date understanding of the challenges” posed by this issue in the face of fast-changing technologies, she said. “The mediation process is clearly to the benefit of all stakeholders.”

    Vitorino’s appointment was welcomed by right holder groups IMPALA; the Association of European Performers’ Organisations; EUROCOPYA, the European Association of Audiovisual & Film Producers’ Collective Management Societies; GESAC, which represents authors; the International Federation for the Phonographic Industry; and the Society of Audiovisual Authors. The organisations said they are “very much open to discussion on this issue and regret the time that has been lost since the premature closure of the previous dialogue in early 2010.”

    Push for EU-Wide Patents Continues

    Government talks on unitary European patent protection and a common patent court continue at a 5 December meeting of the Competitiveness Council in Brussels. Members of the council are internal market, industry, research and space ministers.

    Officials will debate a package aimed at establishing a common patent system and translation arrangements, the council said. Poland, which currently holds the rotating EU presidency, “is committed to facilitate a political agreement within the Council on the package before end 2011,” it said. Governments have modified the original EC measures by boosting provisions benefiting small and medium-sized companies, it said. The European Parliament is expected to vote on the draft regulations early in 2012, it said.

    At the same meeting, ministers will consider how to finance an EU patent court and where it should be located, the council said.

    Dugie Standeford may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 107.21.156.140