SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Talk Of Treaties, Revenue Increase, Development As WIPO Annual Assemblies Kick Off

    Published on 27 September 2011 @ 10:26 am

    By for Intellectual Property Watch and

    The annual World Intellectual Property Organization meeting of member states kicked off yesterday with hope among participants that the next year could bring a return to positive revenues, a settling of internal dissension, and some of the first treaties at the UN agency in nearly 20 years.

    Discussion in the coming two weeks will focus on spending on development activities, internal reform and construction, and possible future treaty negotiations in areas such as audiovisual performances, limitations and exceptions to copyright, additional rights for broadcasters, protection of traditional knowledge, folklore, and genetic resources, and improvements in industrial design.

    “A nascent confidence in the organisation’s capacity to agree is appearing,” WIPO Director General Francis Gurry emphasised during his opening remarks at the General Assemblies, running this year from 26 September to 5 October. Gurry highlighted several areas where consensus appears to be prevailing in the organisation’s operations.

    The WIPO General Assemblies agenda is here.

    Serbian Ambassador Uglješa Zvekić was appointed chair of the 49th WIPO General Assemblies.

    IGC

    In a united front, the Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC) seeks approval on the renewal of its mandate for the next biennium (IPW, WIPO, 22 July 2011). Renewal of the committee’s mandate has usually been difficult in the past. Director of the Traditional Knowledge Division at WIPO, Wend Wendland, believes that the mandate is “likely to be endorsed” by the Assemblies’ close.

    The IGC’s objective is to agree upon a text of an international legal instrument (or instruments) to ensure the protection of genetic resources (GR), traditional knowledge (TK) and folklore or traditional cultural expressions (TCEs).

    Pending the renewal of its mandate, the committee has agreed to accelerate work, with three sessions planned before the next General Assemblies in 2012. According the committee’s proposed mandate, their next meeting would be an extended session in February and would be devoted GRs, the most controversial of the three IGC themes.

    As experts continue to debate the impact of intellectual property (IP) on biodiversity (IPW, Biodiversity/Genetic Resources/Biotech, 15 September 2011), genetic resources remain a point of contention among member states. Consequently, negotiations on this topic are the least advanced of the IGC themes. South African Ambassador Abdul Minty made note of this during his opening statement on behalf of the Africa Group.

    “Whereas there is progress in the negotiations on TCEs and TK as illustrated by the texts developed, unfortunately the same cannot be said about GRs. The African Group is concerned about the lack of political commitment in the negotiations on genetic resources. In our view, any further procrastination on the negotiations on mandatory disclosure requirement is undermining the letter and spirit of the mandate of the IGC.”

    Copyright

    The WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights (SCCR) is one that is seeing significant movement on its agenda. For years, it focused mainly on trying to agree on a treaty on broadcasters’ rights, which remains on its agenda this week. But in the past couple of years since it was agreed to put aside that effort, several other items have come to the fore.

    A proposal to negotiate on limitations and exceptions to copyright aimed at protecting the public domain and access to knowledge, continues to receive strong attention from many countries. In particular, the last SCCR meeting came close to agreement on a text for exceptions for visually impaired readers (IPW, WIPO, 24 June 2011).

    There is a feeling that the text is nearly finished and that the will exists to resolve the outstanding issues, an observer said. Numerous countries mentioned the goal of completing it in their opening statements. The next SCCR meeting will be in November and the assemblies could enable a quick conclusion.

    A surprise top candidate for a diplomatic conference – highest level negotiation – in 2012 is one on protection of audiovisual performances. Negotiations on that treaty collapsed in 2000, and only this year have been resurrected with the apparent agreement of the final outstanding issue on transfer of rights between performers and producers. The assemblies may call for the diplomatic conference this week.

    Finances, Development

    In what has become rare in the current economic climate, WIPO presented a healthy financial report. With increasing demand for WIPO services (e.g., international patent applications, international trademark registrations, multiple country industrial design registrations, and the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Centre), Gurry said the organisation has maintained its forecast of a 4.7 percent increase in revenue. By way of caution, however, the WIPO Program and Budget Committee proposed to lower expenditure to a 3 percent increase and to continue to monitor the data and adjust accordingly.

    The Program and Budget Committee met just prior to the assemblies. Their report is here.

    The WIPO secretariat proposed a 1.9 percent increase in the development expenditures budget. Many of the regional groups applauded the budgetary increase as a sign of the organisation’s commitment to support the use of the IP system in the least developed and developing countries.

    The Development Agenda Group (DAG), however, expressed some skepticism regarding the true value of the increase. “While the group warmly welcomes the upward revision in terms of 21.3 percent of the budget being allocated to development expenditure as compared to 19.4 percent in the last biennium, it is important to arrive at an objective assessment of the precise extent of resources being spent on development-oriented initiatives and activities,” India said on behalf of the DAG.

    “In the absence of such a precise definition, inflated figures could lead to misleading impressions that a large percentage of WIPO’s budget is being spent on development-oriented activities,” he said.

    Brazil in its statement also was positive but raised some concern about the proposed development budget for the 2012-2013 biennium. The Brazilian ambassador called for improving monitoring tools and reassessing performance indicators in order to make corrections if required. He also noted the agreement in the 2007 WIPO Development Agenda that WIPO committees will provide descriptions of their development work to the assemblies, which he said should include the Program and Budget Committee.

    While WIPO has not negotiated a major “game-changing” policy treaty since its 1996 so-called internet treaties – on copyright and recordings – it did successfully negotiate the Development Agenda in 2007. It also negotiated the 1999 Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs, the 2000 Patent Law Treaty, and the 2006 Singapore Treaty on the Law of Trademarks.[Updated]

    The work of the Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP), which is overseeing implementation of the Development Agenda, will be under scrutiny during the assemblies as well.

    India said in its statement that the Development Agenda replaced the notion that IP is good in itself with the notion that IP is good for countries in different situations. They urged the WIPO Global Issues Division to report on its activities regularly.

    Group B developed countries expressed support for the PBC budget recommendations with an eye toward savings and efficiency gains.

    Standards, Industrial Design, Geographical Indications

    There are a number of other areas on the wish lists of WIPO member states for the coming year. For instance, Italy encouraged stronger engagement at WIPO on geographical indications, agricultural product names that derive from specific regions or characteristics. The delegate mentioned a new focus being placed on the WIPO-managed Lisbon Agreement on International Registration of Appellations of Origin.
    France mentioned its wish to move to a diplomatic conference on industrial design when the time is right.

    Several developed countries mentioned their interest progress being made on the committee on standards and IP, which hit a stalemate last year.

    Calls for IP Balance, Non-Politicization of WIPO

    Opening day statements from a number of governments praised the current positive environment at WIPO and cited work that is progressing. But they also ranged in focus. India called for continued attention to an “equitable” IP system that balances rights of innovators with costs to society of granting them monopolies. They acknowledged that innovation is at the heart of economic growth, and said India is committed to the multilateral process at WIPO.

    Morocco said it believes that there is a move toward a balanced regime for IP.

    France said it must ensured that WIPO retains its “nature” above all else, keeping high standards of IP, and must not be allowed to become “overly politicised.”

    Gurry, in his opening remarks, also highlighted the adoption of a substantive work programme by the Standing Committee on the Law of Patents (SCP), for the first time in years.

    In general, he laid out three overarching themes to his strategic plan: the agency’s policy work, the financial condition of the organisation, and the formal inauguration of a large, new office building adjacent to the WIPO headquarters, just off Geneva’s Place des Nations. Gurry said some 500 staff have moved there from rented quarters. Now attention will turn to completing a new conference hall on the site, with the hope of holding the 2013 assemblies there (instead of in the nearby Geneva conference centre as this year).

    [Update:] During the country statements, Australia announced that it had made a significant donation to the WIPO Voluntary Fund to support the participation of indigenous and local communities in the work of the IGC.

    Rachel Marusak Hermann may be reached at rachel@rachels-ink.com.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. This week in review … WIPO Assemblies open in Geneva « Traditional Knowledge Bulletin says:

      [...] of the IGC.  Visit the meeting website … Follow the webcast … Read the WIPO press release … Read the IP Watch article … Advertisement Eco World Content From Across The Internet. Featured on EcoPressed 4 FREE [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.