• Home
  • About Us
    • About Us
    • Subscribe
    • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise
    • Advertise On IP Watch
    • Editorial Calendar
  • Videos
  • Links
  • Help

Intellectual Property Watch

Original news and analysis on international IP policy

  • Copyright
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Opinions
  • People News
  • Venues
    • Bilateral/Regional Negotiations
    • ITU/ICANN
    • United Nations – other
    • WHO
    • WIPO
    • WTO/TRIPS
    • Africa
    • Asia/Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin America/Caribbean
    • North America
  • Themes
    • Access to Knowledge/ Open Innovation & Science
    • Food Security/ Agriculture/ Genetic Resources
    • Finance
    • Health & IP
    • Human Rights
    • Internet Governance/ Digital Economy/ Cyberspace
    • Lobbying
    • Technical Cooperation/ Technology Transfer
  • Health Policy Watch

EU’s Kroes Not Amused By ICANN Decision On New TLDs

22/06/2011 by Intellectual Property Watch Leave a Comment

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

By Monika Ermert for Intellectual Property Watch

European Commission Vice President and Digital Agenda Commissioner Neelie Kroes is not satisfied with the decision of the ICANN Board in Singapore this week to open up the domain name space for new top-level domains (TLDs) like .eco, .gay or .paris.

The Commissioner was “disappointed that the ICANN Board has repeatedly overlooked public policy concerns,” her spokesman Jonathan Todd wrote in answer to questions from Intellectual Property Watch.

Todd pointed to letters by the EC and the US Government immediately before the ICANN meeting covering competitions concerns. Moreover, governments gathered on the eve of the ICANN meeting also according to Todd sent a “clear statement urging the ICANN Board not to adopt draft new procedures for creating new generic Internet top level domains (gTLDs) without first resolving a series of important public policy concerns, notably as regards allowing cross-ownership between Registries and Registrars and requiring that trademarks should be ‘in use’ to be protected by a special regime under the new rules.”

The “ICANN Board failed to provide responses on how it intended to address these concerns,” the Commission warned. Instead “despite this advice, the ICANN Board today went ahead and adopted its new guidelines.” From Kroes’ point of view this has been the “second time in a row that the ICANN Board disregards governmental advice on public policy issues” – the first case being the creation the .xxx top-level domain.

The EC now will carefully examine the statement issued by the ICANN board following the decision today and “coordinate its response with EU Member States and confer with international partners, notably the US.”

ICANN together with the resolution on the start of the TLD process also has published its reasons [pdf] for issues where it did not take GAC advice.

ICANN is obliged to do this according to the bylaws. The Commission will remain a strong supporter of the multistakeholder model which governs the internet, Todd wrote.

“However,” he said, “the absence of an appropriate response on the part of ICANN to substantive public policy concerns underscores the need for the model to be reformed to remain sustainable.”

Vice-President Kroes said: “The lack of an adequate response on the part of ICANN Board clearly points to some deficiencies in the current functioning of the model. This calls for specific actions in order to remedy the situation.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

Creative Commons License"EU’s Kroes Not Amused By ICANN Decision On New TLDs" by Intellectual Property Watch is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Filed Under: IP-Watch Briefs, IP Policies, Language, Themes, Venues, Access to Knowledge/ Education, English, Europe, ITU/ICANN, Information and Communications Technology/ Broadcasting, Trademarks/Geographical Indications/Domains

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
My Tweets

IPW News Briefs

Saudis Seek Alternative Energy Partners Through WIPO Green Program

Chinese IP Officials Complete Study Of UK, European IP Law

Perspectives on the US

In US, No Remedies For Growing IP Infringements

US IP Law – Big Developments On The Horizon In 2019

More perspectives on the US...

Supported Series: Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities

Civil Society And TRIPS Flexibilities Series – Translations Now Available

The Myth Of IP Incentives For All Nations – Q&A With Carlos Correa

Read the TRIPS flexibilities series...

Paid Content

Interview With Peter Vanderheyden, CEO Of Article One Partners

More paid content...

IP Delegates in Geneva

  • IP Delegates in Geneva
  • Guide to Geneva-based Public Health and IP Organisations

All Story Categories

Other Languages

  • Français
  • Español
  • 中文
  • اللغة العربية

Archives

  • Archives
  • Monthly Reporter

Staff Access

  • Writers

Sign up for free news alerts

This site uses cookies to help give you the best experience on our website. Cookies enable us to collect information that helps us personalise your experience and improve the functionality and performance of our site. By continuing to read our website, we assume you agree to this, otherwise you can adjust your browser settings. Please read our cookie and Privacy Policy. Our Cookies and Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2021 · Global Policy Reporting

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.