SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Open Access Database Of Key HIV Patents Launched By Medicines Patent Pool

    Published on 7 April 2011 @ 2:08 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    The Medicines Patent Pool, an initiative aiming at increasing access to HIV drugs through voluntary licences of patented drugs, has launched a new database of patent information on HIV medicines.

    The database was developed with the support of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), and national and regional patent offices, Ellen ‘t Hoen, executive director of the Medicines Patent Pool, said during a 4 April press briefing.

    The database is the most accessible publicly available patent status information on HIV medicines in developing countries, ‘t Hoen said. It covers 67 developing countries and 23 HIV medicines. “This is a wider range of countries than have ever been made publicly available,” she said.

    The Medicines Patent Pool aims at increasing access to “quality, safe, efficacious, more appropriate and affordable medicines,” with a focus on HIV/AIDS, according to its website. “Patent holders are compensated for sharing their patents, generic manufacturers gain access to markets, and patients benefit more swiftly from appropriate and adapted medicines at more affordable prices,” it says (IPW, Public Health, 10 March 2011).

    The database “can open the doors to make general patent information available to those who need it,” ‘t Hoen said, “well beyond intellectual property lawyers or pharmaceutical companies.”

    Information on patent status is increasingly important in humanitarian supply of anti- retroviral medicines, according to ‘t Hoen. The lack of reliable information can be a problem, for example, for supply organisations which may not know to which countries they can supply low cost generic medicines.

    The database will help public health organisations know where a drug is patented. Organisations have tried to obtain this information on patent status in the past, but most of them did not have the capacity or knowledge to search for this information, ‘t Hoen said.

    The objective of the patent pool was not to develop a database, she said. The patent pool needed this knowledge for its own purposes, which is “trying to increase competition and increase innovation in the field of HIV through making voluntary licences,” she said, and trying to get patent holders to enter into negotiation with the patent pool. They had thus a need to find out who holds the patents and where those patents are located.

    Through the effort of trying to get the information, “we realised that many others had a need for this information,” she said, and the patent pool decided to put the database in the public domain “for everyone to use.” The database is available online, on the patent pool website.

    According to Pascale Boulet, IP and regulatory advisor for the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), speaking in her capacity as advisor to the patent pool, one of the critical values of the database is that it links the names of medicines to relevant patents, which was not the case in a usual patent database. Another interesting feature, she said at the briefing, is that many consultations with stakeholders were carried out to identify the few key patents that are linked to specific medicines.

    The database also includes the patent numbers, when the information was available, he said. That can help people check if the patent is still valid, or expired or modified.

    Although the patent database is not fully comprehensive – something Boulet called nearly impossible – it is a “much better starting point for public health organisations which need information to buy cheaper medicine.”

    “We hope that by sharing it [the database] today,” a kind of “wiki” effect can be achieved, with users of the database providing information and helping the patent pool to improve it, so that it can be further shared with a wider community, Boulet said.

    According to Lutz Mailänder, head of the WIPO Patent Information Section, it is the first time WIPO has been involved in such a specific project. The availability of the legal status of patents is insufficient, in particular in developing countries, he said. This is why the patent pool approached WIPO to get some help to find this information, he said.

    The legal status of patents nationally is not usually available online from national patent offices in developing countries. At the moment, patent offices have to be asked to check into their files. Some countries offered some strong support to answer questions from the patent pool, with the collaboration of WIPO, which “used their contacts” in the patent offices, he said.

    It is important to raise awareness in developing country patent offices, Mailänder said. “We need more attention to availability on legal status,” he said. Legal status of patent will also be important for the future, in particular for green technology, and for technology transfer, he said.

    According to ‘t Hoen, although the database will have to be regularly updated, procurement agencies should not rely only on the database information , and should check with national authorities on the current status of patents.

    “The lack of access to medicines has many causes, but confusion over who is legally able to manufacture or import medicines in what country can delay needed treatments in places where there are in fact no legal barriers,” said a patent pool press release.

    The database includes information on patent holders, patent application reference numbers, expected dates of patent expiration, and in which countries patents have been filed for, granted, withdrawn, or do not apply, the release said.

    Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. HIV Drugs Patent status Database « PATENT DAILY says:

      [...] [IP-watch] [Database link] Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Darunavir Paragraph IV litigationCI & Patent News: 29/11/2010CI & Patent News 27/10/2010NIH joins HIV drug pool [...]

    2. patent litigation says:

      It’s nice knowing that the beneficial effects of the patent pool extend beyond the “mere” existence of the pool itself. This kind of information could be of great use to the general public, for many purposes. I hope that it will transcend difficulties presented by the lack of availability of data in developing countries.


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.