SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Last Online Voices Before Change Bursts From Digital Darkness In Egypt?

    Published on 28 January 2011 @ 11:40 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    For any visitor to Egypt, it is impossible to ignore the extraordinary destitution of masses of people living in dusty, stark cement structures everywhere on the edges of Cairo or the choked roads clogged with a far-too-rapidly swollen population. Reports from the ground via digital technologies chronicled events that hit this week, but it might be the digital silence today that seals the change.

    Observations in the past were that academics, journalists, bloggers, scientists, inventors and technologists working in Egypt clearly were among the world’s elite in their fields but seemed to work with small excuses and with caution, finding countless ways to keep up with the latest global thinking while avoiding stepping over the many lines that might trigger a reaction from security forces or someone else. There seemed to be a defined sense of what could and could not be said or done, with perhaps increasingly bold nudges into the disallowed in recent years.

    Bloggers in particular made big cuts into the tight grip of government in recent years, risking severe recrimination to show videos and tell stories about abuses of citizens on the street or those taken away. There is ongoing discussion on listservs and blogs about how much of a role electronic tools like Twitter, Facebook, Skype or YouTube played in the recent overturn of the Tunisian leadership. And those same tools were in use in this week’s buildup of events in Egypt.

    But the tone seemed to change both outside and in the country early today – the Day of Anger – when the Egyptian government broke new ground in almost totally shutting off internet access in the country, attempting to send it into a digital darkness. Facebook pages of Egyptian access to knowledge scholars and others showed a balanced, steady stream of reports from their locations in the country during the week until they just cut off last night.

    This blog from James Cowie of Renesys, tells the technical story of Egypt’s drop off the internet, having apparently come from an order of the Egyptian government to the four main internet service providers in the country.

    Last Citizen E-Communication from the Ground

    One lawyer resorted to Skype to correspond this week after Facebook was blocked, reporting a string of messages that must have been similar to millions of others:

    [1/25/2011 ] they blocked Twitter here
    hope not FB
    follow on what we post on FB
    and CNN too
    it is big this time
    pray for us

    On 26 January the lawyer reported again:

    [1/26/2011] they blocked fb again
    it is getting v. bad here
    it was bad in afternoon
    but they attacked the protesters badly
    A lot of blood
    and some passed away
    someone shuould warn those in power here
    killing people will not help anyone
    the US gov is really stupid
    we need a declaration as strong as it was towards Iran
    everything is monitored here
    they are recording all our phone calls
    read our mails
    and they might be following us here
    this is v. nasty!!!!
    many has been jailed
    I hope the people everywhere can post about what is happening here
    so the world KNOW
    maybe someone still has brain
    to stop the brutality of the policemen
    hope mr. Obama can hear the youth of EG

    The attorney mentioned reports that criminals were sent into the crowds to claim they are protesters but carrying weapons, and stealing, noting:

    i wonder if this news reach you
    it is v. dangerous

    The source also mentioned doubts about news coverage, saying President Mubarak was said to have made a deal with Aljazeera news agency, visiting them twice in recent weeks.

    Then randomly, a final, single message came in at about 10:00 at night on 27 January, just minutes before the near-complete cutoff of the internet:

    [1/27/2011] check this https://www.accessnow.org/page/s/help-egypt

    That reference was to a link to a group called Access, supported by a variety of open internet luminaries like Harvard Law School Professor Larry Lessig, which is trying to construct ways for Egyptian citizens to get online despite the crackdown. The group was the subject of some debate and scepticism on listservs, but seems to be accepted as legitimate.

    Global Voices, a blogger group, had a report on how people in Egypt are still getting communications out. For instance, at least one twitter account set up on 28 January is getting around the government block using call-ins, as is another twitter account of one person, which reported that landline phones are working.

    Meanwhile, a more ominous support message from Anonymous, the hacker group that also claims credit for online actions supporting Wikileaks, has been circulated online. In a Youtube video, here, the Anonymous group threatened to take down Egyptian government websites and make anyone supporting the regime pay unless the government showed some signs of concession toward its peoples’ demands.

    Reports say United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon criticised the shutdown of internet access in Egypt. The Internet Society issued a statement criticising the shutdown.

    Internet policy experts are abuzz with discussion about how to prevent governments from blocking their citizens’ access to the internet. It is likely fora will emerge for making these discussions more concrete.

    [Update: the Internet Rights and Principles dynamic coalition has issued a statement calling for Egypt to respect its peoples' right to online freedom of expression and restore access to information and communications technologies. Call for freedom of expression online in Egypt here [pdf].]

    The Talents, and Doubts, of Egyptian Scholars

    Government officials engaged in international negotiations related to intellectual property rights, public health, trade and the like have often been among the more outspoken for developing countries’ needs, exhibiting a savvy negotiating style that befitted a leading power in the region and a historically recognised world civilization.

    It is perhaps not ironic that the forces of change in Tunisia, Egypt and elsewhere are occurring without – and even contrary to – United States support. One could even wonder whether Iraq might also have ultimately seen change without the hundreds of billions of dollars of expenditure and thousands of lives lost.

    Those in Egypt who might stand to benefit from the global intellectual property rights system have been suspicious of that system constructed from outside. For example, an Egyptian scientist told Intellectual Property Watch last year that Egypt sees significant “agricultural tourism” – people coming to see its marvels in agricultural advances where it has thrived on the Nile. And it is proud to have many advances in genetic resources and traditional knowledge. But when the World Intellectual Property Organization came to promote the creation of a database to collect some of this information with an eye toward IP rights protection, Egyptians resisted out of concern that they would lose control of those resources and ideas.

    Mubarak has declared a new government will be installed. But it remains to be seen what a new Egypt will look like.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.