SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    WHO Members Again Attempt Global Plan Against Pandemics

    Published on 6 December 2010 @ 1:13 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    The most recent outbreak of pandemic influenza was mild, but the World Health Organization is still working on a plan of what to do should another, more severe outbreak ever occur. States will come together this month in another attempt to finalise this plan.

    The pandemic plan has defied consensus resolution for several years due to disagreements about a standard material transfer agreement, including intellectual property rights provisions, for the sharing of viruses and other pandemic-related materials and, equally, for sharing related benefits.

    The meeting of the Open-Ended Working Group [pdf] on Pandemic Influenza Preparedness is set for 13-17 December. This open-ended working group is the latest in a series of attempts to conclude a framework on pandemic influenza preparedness.

    Aware of the importance of this plan, delegates have been gathering informally outside the WHO in recent weeks to prepare for what they hope will be a successful negotiation. Recently, the co-chairs of the Open-Ended Working Group gathered several critical country representatives at the Mexican mission on 24 November to discuss the process for the December negotiation, according to sources. The point was in part to agree on procedure and other “non-core issues,” said one source, so that time is not wasted during a negotiation which has serious substantive issues to tackle.

    The two major points that will be focal areas of the upcoming meeting are the initial results of technical studies being prepared by the World Health Organization to aid the working group in its efforts to complete the framework, and then the remaining issues outstanding.

    The studies are covering the “current activity, financing and unmet financial and other needs” related to: building capacity in laboratories and for surveillance as well as for vaccine production, and increasing access to and affordability of vaccines, diagnostics and other pandemic preparedness and response materials, the outline says.

    The outstanding issues include the text of a standard material transfer agreement for use within the WHO network of laboratories and a possible SMTA for use when materials are transferred outside the network, for example to pharmaceutical companies.

    As yet undecided is what comprises the WHO network, though there are proposals to just use the Global Influenza Surveillance Network, the WHO mechanism monitoring and response to create influenza vaccines. Also undecided is the definition of “pandemic influenza preparedness biological materials.” These definitions are important as they determine the scope of the framework under negotiation. A further area not yet having reached consensus is whether to include a reference to the World Trade Organization Doha Declaration on the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement and Public Health.

    The latest text of the framework, with brackets (or remaining non-agreed areas) is available here [pdf].

    The working outline for the technical studies is available here [pdf]. The studies are intended to run through March 2011, the outline says, though preliminary findings were to be made available in English to the open-ended working group as of 1 December.

    The Open-Ended Working Group is meant to report on its progress to the WHO Executive Board meeting, scheduled for 17-25 January 2011. A finished product is hoped for by the May 2011 World Health Assembly.

    Background

    This is the second working group set up to find a consensus solution to handling potential influenza outbreaks. After the avian influenza outbreak in 2005, WHO members agreed to set up the Intergovernmental Meeting on Pandemic Influenza Preparedness: Sharing of influenza viruses and access to vaccine and other benefits. This group met for the first time in November 2007, with a deadline of May 2009 to complete its work. The documentation of these meetings is available here.

    But in May 2009, members were unable to finish a framework for pandemic influenza preparedness, and passed on the decision to the World Health Assembly (IPW, WHO, 18 May 2009).

    The 2009 World Health Assembly gave the WHO director general responsibility for taking forward the pandemic influenza process in hopes of reaching a final agreement in time for the 2010 January Executive Board meeting (IPW, WHO, 22 May 2009).

    Though a WHO declaration in June 2009 that swine flu was a global pandemic put pressure on negotiations, a consensus was still not forthcoming by January 2010. So a new Open-ended Working Group of Member States On Pandemic Influenza Preparedness: Sharing of influenza viruses and access to vaccine and other benefits was launched. It met for the first time 10-12 May, and recommended that the 2010 WHA allow it to continue meeting until the 2011 WHA (IPW, WHO, 14 May 2010). This was approved.

    Chan told member states at the 2010 World Health Assembly that it was “just plain lucky” that the swine flu had not been a more dangerous virus (IPW, WHO, 18 May 2010).

    The swine flu pandemic was declared over in August 2010, amid criticisms that its severity had been exaggerated. An external review of the WHO’s response to the pandemic is ongoing, with a final report on its findings expected at the WHA in May 2011.

    The December meeting of the Open-Ended Working Group will be its second formal gathering.

    Kaitlin Mara may be reached at kmara@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. WHO Group Strikes Landmark Deal On Global Framework For Flu Pandemics | Intellectual Property Watch says:

      [...] avian flu outbreak changed the dynamics of the debate. For a description of the background, see (IPW, WHO, 6 December 2010). WHO members recognised the importance of industry’s role heading into last week’s [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.