SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

To What Extent Can Global IP Rules Be Responsive To Public Interest Demands? The Case Of The Treaty For The Visually Impaired

To what extent can global intellectual property rules address in an effective manner the needs of the most vulnerable members of society? This is the key question with which member states of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) are faced as they prepare to meet next week for a diplomatic conference, in Marrakesh, that should result in the adoption of a treaty to facilitate access to copyrighted works by visually impaired persons and persons with print disabilities.


Interview With Tanja Rajić: The Impact Of EU Enlargement On Trademark Practice In Croatia

Ten years after applying for membership, Croatia is finally joining the European Union on 1 July 2013. Tanja Rajić, senior associate at PETOSEVIC, explains how six years of accession negotiations and the adoption of the acquis communautaire have affected intellectual property protection in Croatia and prepared it for becoming a member state.





Latest Comments
  • We in India should not change our policy, speciall... »
  • We in India should not change our policy, speciall... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Spanish Collecting Society Targets Group Proposing Alternative Royalty System

    Published on 22 September 2010 @ 10:05 am

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    A Spanish group lobbying for alternative ways to protect and promote creative production has been asked to cease activity or face a lawsuit for damages, unfair competition and infringement by the Spanish collecting society SGAE (Sociedad General de Autores y Editores), according to the group. The collecting society also charged that the lobbying group is undermining its reputation.

    Update: EXGAE has changed its name to La EX, the group announced on 29 November. The entity said the lawsuit was an opportunity to “make demands that could turn out to be a spectacular boost for some of the battles that so many people have been engaged in for so long.” According to the release, the SGAE «excludes» any intention to sue, and would engage in a dialogue with civil society on free licences in the spring of 2011.

    Lobbying group EXGAE has claimed they received a fax in August asking them to effectively disappear “from the face of the earth within the next seven days.” EXGAE “facilitates a legal consultancy service for artists and those affected by the actions of traditional royalties management organisations and other cultural industry groups,” according to its website.

    The fax received on behalf of the SGAE alleged, among other things, unfair competition regarding “the nature of the activities it carries out, under the provision of the Trademarks Law,” EXGAE said.

    In the fax, the SGAE claimed illegitimate use of their name, which phonetically in Spanish is pronounced “esgae”, unacceptable references to their name on EXGAE’s website, unfair competition, and asked that EXGAE stop activities related to those alleged offences, according to the fax [pdf] (in Spanish).

    The collecting society gave seven days for EXGAE to comply before taking legal action, according to the group. The SGAE is a private entity collecting royalties and distributing them to authors for the use of their work.

    In a press release from SGAE dated 9 September, the collecting society required that EXGAE terminates “the unlawful use of the mark and to stop making a constant smear reference to the name” (SGAE). The release said that the “misuse of another’s trademark to describe its own services” constitutes unfair competition. It also said EXGAE’s activities were undermining the reputation of the SGAE, which represents over 98,000 artists.

    SGAE requested that EXGAE “terminate the use of signs including the names SGAE and EXGAE; remove from the market any product or service that include the names of SGAE or EXGAE; give up ownership of the exgae.net domain” on the internet, according to the release. If the requirements were ignored, the SGAE “will be forced to bring the relevant legal proceedings.” Asked this week by Intellectual Property Watch if such legal proceedings were underway, SGAE provided no answer.

    Simona Levi, a member of EXGAE, told Intellectual Property Watch in an interview that the group was not against copyrights and royalties but disagreed on the way royalties were handled and distributed by collecting societies, namely by the SGAE.

    The way royalties are distributed today only promotes well-known artists and does not support the creation and dissemination of music in the digital era, she said.

    EXGAE received a lot of support after receiving the fax from SGAE, Levi said, countering the allegation of unfair competition, and saying that EXGAE was not managing royalties.

    EXGAE provides free legal advice to artists, programmers, cultural institutions, and schools, Levi said. It facilitates consultations with specialised lawyers when arduous legal cases arise. EXGAE is also a think tank and lobby group at the national and European level.

    The group also organises cultural events to “normalise the use and relation with free culture creation and diffusion,” Levi said. One of those events are the Oxcars, a “four hours marathon really showing culture production.” The Oxcars are defined on EXGAE’s website as “the first non-competitive awards in the history of culture” as the event was trying to show that “applying competitive criteria to the culture sphere distorts its very essence.” The next Oxcars “free culture award ceremony” will be held in Barcelona on 28 October.

    Another initiative by the group is to encourage the use of CopyLeft music, under Creative Commons with commercial use for small shops wishing to have music in the background, so that they do not have to pay what EXGAE defines as “extra money” for the service.

    Also, in March, during the summit of the ministers of culture of the European Union countries, and their meeting with the Forum of Cultural Industries. EXGAE organised a parallel citizen summit, the (D’) Evolution Summit. The activist group monitored what was being said during discussions and reported on it, the information being circulated by 700 social networks, according to the EXGAE website.

    Catherine Saez may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Free culture in Barcelona: materials on EXGAE « media/anthropology says:

      [...] 22 Sep 2010. Intellectual Property Watch » Blog Archive » Spanish Collecting Society Targets Group Proposing Al… [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 67.202.9.192