SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Musician Stevie Wonder Just Calls On WIPO To Improve Books Access

    Published on 20 September 2010 @ 7:03 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    Grammy award-winning singer/songwriter and UN Messenger of Peace Stevie Wonder today called on the governments of the World Intellectual Property Organization to create a system for copyright law to assist those with disabilities in getting access to education and reading materials. It is time to “declare a state of emergency and end the information deprivation that continues to keep the visually impaired in the dark,” he told assembled delegates.

    There are “people who probably have far more to offer than myself who are locked in this prison because information is not available to them,” Wonder later told a press conference.

    What is needed is “a programme or foundation or system… that would make that information, that copyright available to those who are physically disabled in a way that does not infringe upon any of the rights, but clearly it’s understood that the rights are given based on a person or group’s disability,” Wonder said in response to an Intellectual Property Watch question (see video below).

    [Update: a transcript of Wonder's speech is available here [pdf] and a video of his full speech is available here.]

    In a press conference, Stevie Wonder answers IP-Watch on copyright and knowledge access

    “While I know that it is critical not to act to the detriment of the authors who labour to create the great works that enlighten and nourish our minds, hearts and souls, we must develop a protocol that allows the easy import and export of copyright materials so that people with print disabilities can join the mainstream of the literate world,” Wonder told assembled diplomats, entreating them to “work towards a consensus.”

    Attempts to draft a treaty for the visually impaired have been under negotiation at WIPO for several years, but a disappointing setback at the last Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights left some despairing of quick progress on completing that treaty (IPW, WIPO, 26 June 2010).

    Wonder said he was launching today a “declaration of freedom for people with disabilities,” empowering them by “providing them with the tools to learn and grow.”

    “I understand that the EU, the group of Brazil, Mexico and Paraguay, the US and the Africa[n] group have proposed different plans on how to address the cross border transfer of information,” for those who are visually impaired, Wonder said. “And there are issues on how to develop a protocol that has a binding effect, and at the same time respects the rights of all involved.”

    “It can be done,” he said. “We have the greatest minds in the world right here in this room. Please work it out. Or I’ll have to write a song about what you didn’t do.” He added that if WIPO could accomplish an agreement by next year, he would come back and sing a celebratory concert at the 2011 General Assemblies.

    The World Blind Union, which has been a leading voice in the drive for a visually impaired treaty endorsed Wonder’s statement and emphasised that “less than 1 percent of all published works in developing countries are available in accessible formats which visually impaired people can read [and] in industrialised countries this percentage is still less than 5 percent.”

    Wonder was speaking at the opening of WIPO’s decision-making General Assemblies, taking place from 20-29 September.

    At the top of the agenda for this year’s Assemblies are discussions on a new strategic plan for WIPO, which is asking questions about how it can best play its role – as space for often very slow discussions and norm-setting processes on aspects of IP policy – in a world of increasingly rapid innovation and technical change.

    “We are challenged by the fast pace of change in the external world,” said WIPO Director General Francis Gurry in his opening statement to the Assemblies. Gurry also emphasised the importance of WIPO to innovation, and the critical role of innovation in meeting economic and social goals. WIPO’s role is expanding too, he added, to include coordinating not only discussions on the legal framework surrounding IP but also the technical one.

    [Update: a transcript of Gurry's full speech is available here.]

    The WIPO General Assemblies opened today and with a “high level segment” in which ministers of several countries present their view on the role of innovation in growth and development.

    Other headlining agenda items for WIPO’s future aside from the visually impaired treaty are work on creating protection for traditional knowledge, genetic resources and folkore, improving the functioning of the Patent Cooperation Treaty, and the continuing implementation of the WIPO Development Agenda, said Argentina Ambassador Alberto Dumont, who is chairing the meeting. Dumont emphasised the key role that IP plays in the public policies of WIPO’s member states.

    The Philippines minister said it was possible to achieve innovation in the absence of IP and that it was important to see IP rights as not only affording protection for the rights holder but as tools for sustaining national development.


    Stevie Wonder sings to diplomats at WIPO as a demonstration of why access is important.

    Kaitlin Mara may be reached at kmara@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. john e miller says:

      Mr. Stevie Wonder is a master of the elegant but simple lyric … Maybe when a Treaty for the Visually Impaired possesses those same qualities it will stand a chance of passage. The basic Copyright Law verbiage already exists — haiku-like — in the Copyright Law of Japan (Article 37):

      It shall be permissible
      to reproduce in braille
      a work already made public.

      Nothing could be simpler: If it is in Braille you can reproduce and distribute a literary work and the rest can fall into place… maybe Stevie can come up with the melody.

    2. General Global Week in Review 27 September 2010 from IP Think Tank says:

      [...] Stevie Wonder just calls on WIPO to improve books access (IP Watch) (WIPO) (Excess Copyright) (Knowledge Ecology [...]

    3. john e miller says:

      The entire mechanism of the proposed WIPO SCCR Treaties and Recommendations/MOU is flawed in that — as based on 1996 US Copyright Law Section 121 ‘Chafee Amendment’ — all these proposals require a series of definitions as to:

      1. Qualified disability
      2. Qualified format
      3. Who can provide accessible renditions(Trusted Intermediary)
      4. What copyrighted materials are covered

      As long as this structure remains there will always be interests who may object to components of any or all definitions. I personally believe a Treaty structured on the Copyright Law of Japan at Article 37 provides a framework and I have offered such a basic Treaty at:

      https://www3.wipo.int/forum/?p=36&cpage=1#comment-91

      In his ‘New Yorker’ comments to Stevie Wonder’s 48th WIPO Address, Paul Schroeder of the AFB said:

      “Braille generally isn’t a problem for rights-holders because obviously only people who are blind will read it… However, publishers fear e-text because it is too easily pirated.”

      http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/books/2010/09/stevie-wonder-and-books-for-the-blind.html

      So maybe their will be some delegation to SCCR 21 who sees this approach as a means to achieve Mr. Wonder’s stated position and challenge to WIPO Members.


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 54.242.188.217