SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »
  • I deeply apprecite the initiative to combat agains... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Rights Holders Launch Initiative To Protect Content In Africa

    Published on 26 August 2010 @ 3:06 pm

    By for Intellectual Property Watch

    Foreign content producers and broadcasters hope the soon-to-be-launched Africa Media Rights Watch will help convince the region’s regulators and consumers alike to increase respect for copyright.

    DISCOP, which organises television content markets in emerging regions, opened shop in Africa last year to bring together broadcasters seeking African and international programming with content distributors, DISCOP Africa Executive Manager Cherise Barsell said in a 24 August interview. But with film and TV piracy rampant in Africa, Basic Lead, the organiser of DISCOP Africa, and consultant Balancing Act-Africa decided to see how the problem affects the continent’s audiovisual sector, she said. Basic Lead is headquartered in Paris and Los Angeles.

    Cost is King

    Pirated DVDs and CDs, broadcasts and cable programming caused the greatest financial losses, according to the 2009 survey prepared by Sylvain Béletre of Balancing Act. Some broadcasters are themselves major infringers who “forget” to pay copyright royalties to producers or distributors, he said. Hacking pay-TV is another common practice in some countries, and some rights abuses come from inside production houses where employees copy productions they are working on and distribute them.

    All content, whether local or foreign, is pirated, the poll found. Hollywood and Nollywood (Nigerian) films and series are key targets, followed by Bollywood productions, sports events, Latin American telenovelas and local productions other than Nollywood, it found. European content is the least affected.

    Awareness and enforcement of copyright varies widely across African countries, Béletre wrote. To consumers, “what matters is the cost and the quality of the copy made,” he said. Apart from a few nations where efforts have been made to educate buyers about the value of content, most people think piracy is tolerated, he said.

    But piracy is stoppable, most respondents said. Many people see foreign content as “free for all” because there are no local voices advocating for it, but most respondents agreed that theft of local productions is bad for the film industry, national economy and local culture, the survey found. Local content has tended to receive better treatment, the survey found.

    What emerged from the inquiry was a group of key international players, including South African pay-TV platform M-NET, independent distributor Cote Ouest and Canal+Overseas, who were worried about piracy and wanted to do something about it, Barsell said. It is unclear to what extent people who use unauthorised content in these countries would otherwise pay for it.

    Industry Lobby Group Created

    The level of concern prompted a DISCOP forum last year that drew huge interest from producers unable to sell their content in their home countries as well as from broadcasters, Barsell said. DISCOP decided to create a long-term body to address the issues, and Africa Media Rights Watch was born, she said. It settled on the key issues it will focus on last year, and will discuss budget and other matters at the 1-3 September DISCOP in Nairobi, Kenya, she said. The initiative will officially launch at the February 2011 DISCOP in Accra, Ghana, she said.

    The AMRW’s chief members and funding sources will be rights holders, but it will admit broadcasters, regulators, lawyers and others as associates, Barsell said. The initiative’s main goal is to build awareness among regulators about the issues and how they can tackle piracy, she said. Resistance from regulators to the industry group is unlikely, she said.

    The AMRW will investigate acts of piracy, as major players already do, in order to give smaller rights owners the same tools, Barsell said. There will be a complaint link on the organisation’s website where companies can report evidence of unauthorised use of content and send information directly to regulators and broadcasters. This will help build uniform pressure on broadcast regulators to address problems they have notice of, and, in the future, AMRW will provide legal assistance as well, she said.

    The AMRW has not connected with other rights groups such as the World Intellectual Property Organization and European and US copyright offices but there is no reason for such bodies to not to cooperate with each other, Barsell said. A French anti-piracy association attended the first roundtable, and the AMRW hopes to cooperate with South Africa’s as well, she said.

    [Updated:] One South African trademark lawyer welcomed the initiative but questioned whether sub-Saharan copyright laws and enforcement agencies are “up to the challenge.” The only countries with proper anti-counterfeiting legislation in the region are Kenya and South Africa, said Darren Olivier, head of brand enforcement at Bowman Gilfillan and co-founder of the blog site Afro-IP. And South African’s copyright law is a 1978 act “in dire need of a refresher.” he told Intellectual Property Watch.

    Search and seizure raids have been conducted in other sub-Saharan nations but sometimes under laws designed to prevent fraud, not protect IP rights, Olivier said. “I am afraid that most officials, magistrates and even the odd judge become glazed over on the mention of copyright,” so there is lots of work to do, he added.

    Dugie Standeford may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.