SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Global AIDS Conference Sees Pledge Of Access, Call For Funding; IP Rights Discussed

    Published on 28 July 2010 @ 12:37 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    The global AIDS community meeting in Vienna last week ended with renewed determination to fight the epidemic but underlined an urgent need for increased funding to sustain scientific advances and universal access. Some warned against an intellectual property rights enforcement push threatening global access in particular through bilateral and regional trade agreements.

    The 18th International AIDS conference took place from 18-23 July and drew 19,300 participants from 193 countries, according to a press release [pdf].

    The conference aimed at keeping the HIV issue an international priority in the context of a global economic downturn and at promoting universal access to treatment (IPW, Public Health, 19 July 2010).

    “International governments say we face a crisis of resources, but that is simply not true. The challenge is not finding money, but changing priorities,” Julio Montaner, AIDS 2010 chair and president of the International AIDS Society, said in the release. “When there is a Wall Street emergency or an energy crisis, billions upon billions of dollars are quickly mobilised.”

    Scientific evidence that shows benefits earlier expanded treatments benefits are being disregarded by international donors, according to Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF, or Doctors without Borders), with a “general trend toward backtracking on HIV funding.” For instance, research carried out in Lesotho, in southern Africa, showed evidence that earlier treatment “reduced the mortality and hospitalisation among HIV patients by more than 60 percent,” it said. However, international donors tend to advise countries to restrict treatment to people in advanced stages of HIV disease.

    Bill Gates, co-chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, speaking at the conference on 19 July, said there was reduced investment in global health, according to his keynote speech.

    Advocating efficiency, he said, “We have to be honest with ourselves: we do not have the money to treat our way out of this epidemic.” He added that “we need to make sure we are getting the most benefit from each dollar on funding and every ounce of effort.”

    But MSF warned against what they defined as “dominating messages heard throughout the conference calling for more financial efficiencies in a time of economic recession,” that could shift the focus from patient needs.

    Drug prices are increasing, said MSF, such as the cost of improved World Health Organization-recommended first-line regimen. There is also an increased need for second-line drugs, which are “coming down slowly,” the group said, and patent protection is limiting generic competition for newer drugs. Drug companies were not challenged at all on prices during the conference, MSF said, with the “head of a major foundation” stating that drug costs were “low enough” and “efficiencies needed to be found elsewhere,” Tido von Schoen-Angerer of MSF said in a release.

    Countries Need Trade Flexibilities, NGOs Say

    The relationship between intellectual property rights, pricing and access was discussed in several events at the conference.

    At a side session entitled, “Access to Essential ARVs and Intellectual Property Rights: A continued Battle in Developing Countries,” Mark Heywood, of Section 17 in South Africa, said that countries must take advantage of the World Trade Organization Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) flexibilities, according to a report by one of the organisers.

    Supatra Nakapew, of the Thai NGO Coalition on AIDS, said that new threats were coming from the EU-Thailand free trade negotiations with TRIPS-plus rules, and the country is still listed in a United States “watch list” because of a compulsory licence on AIDS, heart disease and cancer drugs.

    The event was organised by China Access to Medicines Research Group, the Third World Network, the South Centre, Lawyers Collective, and Brazilian Interdisciplinary Association on AIDS

    Hu Yuanqiong, legal consultant for China Access to Medicines Research Group, said that China has capacity for generic pharmaceutical production, and that in 2007, 6,913 generic drug companies were established in the country. However, patents prevented local production of second-line formulations of antiretrovirals. The way forward is to make use of patent flexibilities and share information among broad networks like China, India, Brazil, South Africa, and others, Yuanqiong said, according to the organiser’s report.

    Anand Grover of India, the UN special rapporteur on the right to health, said TRIPS flexibilities are threatened by TRIPS-plus measures appearing in the EU-India free trade agreement, according to the report.

    The Third World Network also released a press statement about what they described as the EU actions threatening universal access in developing countries.

    “The EU is negotiating or planning to negotiate free trade agreements with over 90 developing countries and is pushing these countries to accept TRIPS-plus provisions,” Sanya Reid Smith of TWN said in the release. “Some TRIPS-plus provisions that the EU has been pushing are data exclusivity, patent term extension and higher enforcement standards.” That will translate into much higher costs for developing countries, she said.

    Patent Pool, Pharma Efforts

    On 21 July, Ellen ‘t Hoen, senior advisor for the UNITAID Medicines Patent Pool Initiative, presented the strategy of the patent pool during the plenary session. According to her presentation posted to the A2K listserv, the cost of treatment is increasing because new AIDS drugs are likely to be patented in developing countries with high prices. Even in India new drugs might be patentable, as the leading generics producer’s 2005 implementation of the TRIPS agreement introduced patent protection on pharmaceuticals (though with safeguards).

    Some provisions in bilateral or regional free trade agreements are aimed at limiting flexibilities in patent law “well beyond what is required by the WTO,” she said.

    The webcast from the 21 July plenary session is available here.

    UNITAID is a financing mechanism based on a solidarity tax on airline tickets and supported by 29 countries, she said. The Medicines Patent Pool Initiative is a mechanism where patent holders make licences available through the patent pool which will allow others producers to manufacture low cost generic versions of the patented antiretrovirals for developing countries. Royalties to patent owners will be due on the licences taken from the pool.

    A press release from UNITAID said the patent pool will be managed by the Medicines Patent Pool Foundation, which will soon open for business. They will then start negotiations with patent holders.

    In the meantime, the Financial Times reported that three of the world’s largest pharmaceutical groups have agreed to allow generic drug manufacturers use all their existing and experimental HIV medicines royalty-free to sell generics at low cost in developing countries.

    And on 21 July, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) launched a UNAIDS High Level Commission on HIV Prevention. The commission’s goal will be to campaign towards a sustained support for effective HIV prevention programmes over the coming year. The commission’s co-chairs are Françoise Barré-Sinoussi, Nobel Laureate in Medicine for her role in the discovery of HIV, and Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu, Nobel Peace Prize Laureate.

    The biennial AIDS conference convened 248 sessions overall. The next AIDS conference will be held in July 2012 in Washington, DC.

    Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.