SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • This is certainly a good move, but perhaps this is... »
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    New WIPO Development Agenda Group Seeks Transformation Of UN Agency

    Published on 26 April 2010 @ 2:24 pm

    By and , Intellectual Property Watch

    Ongoing efforts to implement the 2007 Development Agenda at the World Intellectual Property Organization took another twist today as a new group was launched representing developing countries seeking full transformation of the United Nations body toward a development-oriented perspective on intellectual property issues.

    The WIPO Committee on Development and IP is meeting from 26-30 April.

    The 2007 Development Agenda agreement represented “a milestone” in achieving a “paradigm shift in the international perspective of intellectual property,” said the delegation of Egypt on behalf of the new group, according to a copy of its opening statement, available here [pdf]. “While the inception of the Development Agenda marked a watershed re-balancing of the global perspective on IP, the mainstreaming and implementation of these recommendations presents a considerable challenge.”

    The Development Agenda is a shift from “viewing IP as an end in itself to viewing it as a means to serve larger public goals of social, economic and cultural development,” the statement added.

    Also new for this week are two reports from the WIPO secretariat: the director general’s report on the implementation of the Development Agenda; and a report on WIPO’s contribution to the UN Millennium Development Goals.

    In addition, as the Development Agenda is currently in its implementation phase, there is a series of updates on projects at different stages of acceptance and implementation being reviewed this week.

    Also on the agenda for the week are discussions on a monitoring and coordination mechanism for the implementation of the Development Agenda.

    WIPO Director General Francis Gurry in his opening remarks said the main challenge after the 2007 General Assembly approved the Development Agenda was how to “operationalise” its 45 approved recommendations, sources said.

    It was understood, Gurry added, that the Development Agenda would not only be projects, but that project methodology was expected to give concrete content and momentum to the implementation.

    WIPO recognises that “each and every” element of the organisation must take development into account, Gurry said, but added that the extent to which development is “mainstreamed” is up to the member governments. He also said a measuring instrument would help members track the budget related to the Development Agenda in a transparent way.

    At least one developing country told the plenary that it wanted the secretariat to take a more proactive role in ensuring mainstreaming, sources said.

    In general in opening remarks today, developing countries appeared not to be critical of efforts so far but put a bigger vision on work going forward. Developed countries generally advanced the view that significant work on implementation and on IP and development has already been done and continues to be done.

    Development Agenda Group

    The “Development Agenda Group,” or DAG, is committed to mainstreaming the development dimension into all areas of WIPO’s work, using a set of guiding principles. A paper on these principles is expected to become an official CDIP document this week, and is also available as a part of the DAG statement linked above.

    The DAG so far consists of: Algeria, Brazil, Cuba, Djibouti, Ecuador, Egypt, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippines, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Uruguay and Yemen. But group members have said any WIPO member who commits to the group’s set of principles may join.

    The DAG said it “aims at coalition building among pro-development groups and member states across regions, and comprises countries at different levels of development.”

    It is traditional within WIPO to form negotiating groups, usually along geographic lines but also on basis of a common position. There has also long been a cross-regional group of developed nations – the so-called “Group B” – in which developed countries holding most of the world’s IP rights negotiates as a bloc.

    The DAG was set up because “there has been no cross-regional issue- and interest-based group of developing countries,” a delegate from the group told Intellectual Property Watch. The Friends of Development group that ushered the Development Agenda negotiations along during several years “died a natural death” after the Agenda’s adoption. The new group is not being formed out of concern that the implementation is not going well, the delegate said, but rather to lend focus to the goal of mainstreaming the development dimension in all aspects of the organisation.

    Coordination Mechanism

    There are also a set of proposals for a coordination mechanism to handle and assess implementation work related to the agenda. These proposals are from the Group B and from Algeria, Brazil and Pakistan. These two proposals were discussed at length at the last CDIP 16-20 November, with the Algeria, Brazil, Pakistan proposal gaining an official co-sponsorship from India and the support of a “like-minded” group of developing countries (IPW, WIPO, 20 November 2009).

    An informal document combining the two proposals was also made at the negotiations in November, and may come up in discussions of the formal texts this week. A copy of it is available here [pdf].

    New Studies

    There are also new studies by civil society groups on the development agenda.

    Think-tank IQsensato has published a working draft of a paper entitled “The Development Agenda and the Changing Face of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO),” which looks at how the Development Agenda has begun to change, and could continue to change, WIPO. And the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development will tomorrow hold a launch at WIPO for a new book entitled “Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development: Development Agendas in a Changing World.”

    New WIPO Logo

    Separately, WIPO today unveiled a new logo which it has said reflects the organisation’s “dynamism and innovative spirit.”


            the old one

    Kaitlin Mara may be reached at kmara@ip-watch.ch.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Links 28/4/2010: Fedora 13 Previews, Android Beyond 50,000 Apps | Techrights says:

      [...] New WIPO Development Agenda Group Seeks Transformation Of UN Agency It is traditional within WIPO to form negotiating groups, usually along geographic lines but also on basis of a common position. There has also long been a cross-regional group of developed nations – the so-called “Group B” – in which developed countries holding most of the world’s IP rights negotiates as a bloc. [...]

    2. US Ambassador: Over-Focus On Development “Will Kill” WIPO | Intellectual Property Watch says:

      [...] took aim particularly at the recently formed Development Agenda Group (IPW, Development, 26 April 2010), a negotiating bloc at WIPO made up of former proponents of the WIPO Development Agenda adopted in [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.