SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Call For Transparency In The Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiation

In this post, three US law professors explain a recent call by over 30 legal scholars for the US Trade Representative to increase transparency for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement intellectual property chapter, and their response to Ambassador Kirk’s response that he is “strongly offended” by the suggestion that the negotiation is not adequately transparent already.





Latest Comments
  • David, thank you for the note. It appears there is... »
  • The link to the US proposal seems to be broken, an... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    European Broadcasters Call For Easier Copyright Clearance For Online Content

    Published on 17 March 2010 @ 6:06 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    European Union copyright law needs to be amended so that the clearance of copyrights is simplified for online content, the European Broadcasting Union said today. The group presented the results of an analysis it conducted today at the European Parliament in Brussels.

    The EBU white paper entitled, “Modern Copyright For Digital Media: Legal Analysis and EBU Proposals” [pdf] states that although EBU fully supports the protection of copyright and related rights, the current EU legal framework on rights clearance “needs to be modernised” so that it is more efficient and the offering to European media will be improved.

    The proposals in the EBU analysis focus on the audiovisual media sector and do not suggest a complete harmonisation of the EU copyright rules, nor do they “fundamentally challenge exclusivity or the current practices of licensing of premium content such as films and sport.”

    The EBU has members from 56 countries in and around Europe and promotes public service media in Europe and around the world. The EBU report was authored by Stephen Edwards, partner at international law firm Reed Smith; Pascal Kamina, associate professor at the University of Poitiers, France; and Karl-Nikolaus Peifer, director of the Institute for Media Law and Communications Law at the University of Cologne.

    Among the proposals, EBU aims to “facilitate EU-wide online licensing through the concept of audiovisual media communication to the public,” as well as “clearance of retransmission rights for any platform,” according to the principle of technological neutrality, where a policy should not favour a particular technology.

    EBU also advises avoidance of “separate rights for the same activity.” That refers to rights being granted by contract or by law to communicate content to the public, which it said should also cover incidental reproductions necessary in the exercise of the licence, and the “general adoption of the ‘extended collective licensing’ model” to clear rights for audio and audiovisual media services.

    Proposals also include: the “simplification of music licensing for audiovisual media services providers,” “the use of collective licences for unlocking broadcasters’ archives,” and the “supervision of collecting societies.”

    The Geneva-based EBU organised the presentation as the EU is planning new legislation on collecting societies, according to an informed source, as confirmed in a video message today by Michel Barnier of the European Commission Internal Market and Services directorate general, according to the source.

    During today’s interactive panel discussions on the expansion of collecting societies and collective licensing proposals, Marielle Gallo, Member of the European Parliament and coordinator of the copyright working group said that supervision and control should be exerted on collecting societies at the national level or through an EU directive.

    For Margot Fröhlinger, director of the European Commission Internal Market directorate general, if there is an expansion of collective licensing, it is indispensable to have rules at the EU level and to ensure transparency.

    Report author Edwards said that in the online music industry, there is a problem as the global music repertoire is becoming fragmented, with a large number of collecting societies making it difficult for a broadcaster to offer a diversified repertoire.

    “Nordic Model”: Working for 50 Years, Europe Interested

    A spokesperson from the Danish Broadcasting Corporation (DR) said that extended collective licensing has been in use in Denmark since the 1960s with satisfactory results. Under this model, DR has an agreement with an umbrella organisation of collecting societies who represent a substantial number of rights owners. This agreement is also applied for authors who are not represented by a collecting society; they are given the same remuneration, he said.

    Under this agreement, DR will be able to give access to all archives and broadcasts, containing fiction, drama and news to Danish citizens, after digitalisation. It’s a win-win situation,” he said, with a new stream of revenue for authors, and access to “all this content” for the public. The authors can opt out if they prefer their production not to be broadcasted, the spokesperson said. The agreement is only permitted for non-commercial use of the archives, he said.

    European Parliament Member Luigi Berlinguer, vice-chair of the Legal Committee, said that this Nordic model is an example. “If it can work there, it can work in Europe,” he said.

    European Commission Consultation on Online Content

    In October, the European Commission launched a public consultation on online content to work on possible European responses to the challenges of right holders, consumers and commercial users. It aimed at examining obstacles to digital distribution of cultural products and services, and illegal downloading.

    A number of comments, including the EBU paper, were submitted to the European Commission during the consultation, which closed on 5 January.

    EBU submission is here [pdf].

    Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Hugo Cox says:

      In the interests of blog cross-fertilization, please see my post on the Commission’s consultation here:

      http://the1709blog.blogspot.com/2010/03/time-for-euro-copyright.html


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.