SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • If it does pass, wouldn't the American internet an... »
  • We shouldn't let this act pass !!it is not just ab... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    2010 US Industry Group Priorities: Patent Reform, USPTO Funds, Genes, Green Tech

    Published on 26 January 2010 @ 6:04 pm

    By for Intellectual Property Watch

    Along with a domestic agenda that includes patent reform and improving the efficiency of the US Patent and Trademark Office, the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) this year also is eyeing issues at the international level, such as genetic resources, environmental technologies and international patent harmonisation.

    During a wide-ranging recent interview with Intellectual Property Watch, Q. Todd Dickinson, who took over as executive director of the AIPLA in September 2008, highlighted several key issues his organisation was working on this year. One of his group’s top priorities is pushing comprehensive patent reform through this year. S. 515 was passed out of the Senate Judiciary Committee in April 2009 and is awaiting floor time in the full chamber.

    “We’re hopeful the Senate will take it up promptly in the new year and that the House will soon move after the Senate does,” Dickinson said, adding they are seeking “a few little tweaks.”

    Another urgent issue AIPLA is working to address is fee diversion at the USPTO (IPW, US Policy, 21 January 2010). The US Congress this year stripped out the usual language in an omnibus spending bill that would have allowed the agency to spend up to a certain amount more than it estimated it would earn via user fee collections. That means anything over the $1.8 billion brought in by the USPTO would go into some sort of general fund to be distributed to non-USPTO related activities. The agency is looking to apply a 15 percent surcharge on USPTO fees to help it get out of the budget hole it is currently in.

    AIPLA is supportive of considering fee increases both on an emergency and longer-term basis, “but a condition concurrent to that is … that the possibility of diversion is ended permanently,” Dickinson explained. “That’s really our number one issue – ending fee diversion permanently.”

    As a former head of the USPTO under President Clinton, Dickinson said he routinely talks to USPTO Director David Kappos, and gives him the basic message: “Keep doing what you’re doing. You have a window of opportunity at the start – a honeymoon, like the president does,” to get things accomplished.

    “The challenge is keeping up with it” in terms of holistic reform, Dickinson continued. “He really needs to fix the finances – that should be priority one through 10.”

    Looking Inward and Outward

    As an organisation, AIPLA is also undergoing several changes, although Dickinson said the group “needed very little reorganisation and tweaking” after he came aboard. But one change he implemented was creating the position of communications and marketing specialist, “to make sure our members understand the value we bring to them given the tough economic times,” as well as external communications, Dickinson added. “We want to become outward-facing in a lot of ways.”

    To that end, the new “Q. and A” webcast [‘Q.’ for Dickinson’s first initial] was launched, during which AIPLA members can log on and ask questions of Dickinson and featured guests – such as Kappos.

    The AIPLA’s Special Committee on Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore, established last October by President Alan Kasper, studies those issues in relation to the development of intellectual property laws and standards, and investigates recent developments both in the US and internationally with regard to legal mechanisms and tools proposed to address these issues. The special committee is looking at what was proposed during December discussions before the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Intergovernmental Committee on IP and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge, and Traditional Cultural Expressions (IGC) (IPW, WIPO, 14 December 2009). That committee was mandated by the annual WIPO General Assemblies to negotiate the text of an “international legal instrument (or instruments) which will ensure the effective protection of” genetic resources, traditional knowledge, and traditional cultural expressions.

    AIPLA’s Emerging Technologies Committee is now also focusing on green technology. A large part of AIPLA’s work ahead will be educating its members on activities in developing countries in these two areas. Albert Tramposch travelled to Geneva in December to listen in on these discussions. As AIPLA deputy executive director, Tramposch is responsible for all international issues, including WIPO, and serves as AIPLA’s interface with the USPTO on many issues.

    AIPLA will host its first IP Practitioners Association Summit in March to discuss nuts and bolts of patent practitioners issues concerning global patent backlogs and other issues. AIPLA and the International Federation of Intellectual Property Attorneys (Federation Internationale des Conseils en Propriete Industrielle – FICPI), will also cohost a June symposium in Edinburgh, Scotland, which will focus on patent backlogs and ways to smooth out the patent application and approval processes, as well as other global patent office issues. Speakers invited to that event include Kappos and new WIPO deputy director for patents and former AIPLA Director James Pooley, as well as the head of the Australian patent office. More heads of offices are expected to attend as well.

    AIPLA has been heavily involved in the trilateral discussions between the USPTO, Japanese Patent Office (JPO) and the European Patent Office (EPO). That group is now working on “common format, common work” issues, and administration harmonisation activities like common search requirements, search documents and citation documents for all participating offices to use.

    “We’ve been at this for a long time,” Dickinson said, adding that Kappos is very committed to the project “to get this administration harmonisation moving forward.”

    The Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), managed by WIPO, is also on AIPLA’s agenda. The PCT, which allows patent applicants to file international patent applications, will see several changes this year (IPW, Patent Policy, 19 January 2010). For example, applicants can now ask the receiving office or the WIPO International Bureau to prepare and transmit or to obtain, respectively, a certified copy of the previous application(s) from a digital library. As deputy director of WIPO, Pooley has the PCT at the top of his priority list; AIPLA has been working on PCT reform, along with the USPTO.

    Liza Porteus Viana may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.