SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »
  • I deeply apprecite the initiative to combat agains... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Special Report: IP Protection Secondary To Support For Small African Innovators

    Published on 19 November 2009 @ 12:58 pm

    By for Intellectual Property Watch

    Systematic and sustained programmes aimed at identifying and supporting African innovative talent may be a key part of Africa’s technological evolution, according to researchers and young entrepreneurs interviewed by Intellectual Property Watch. The second of a two-part series highlighting innovation challenges in Africa focuses on harnessing and nurturing African innovation talent.

    In Kenya, one need not have a credit history, credit card or bank account to be a part of the paperless economy; all that is required is a mobile phone. With a mobile phone, one can pay for groceries at a tiny village shop, a ride in a taxi or transfer money to a relative in another town. The mobile phone, and especially the short messaging service (SMS), is a technology that young Kenyan entrepreneurs have adapted and repurposed in ways that are dramatically altering the lives of many people. However, the first challenge for African countries is identifying and harnessing this innovative talent.

    Identifying Talent

    Technology professor Nathan Eagle, who is an Omidyar Fellow at the Sante Fe Institute in the United States and a visiting lecturer at the University of Nairobi, said, “My best students at the University of Nairobi are on par with my best students at MIT [the Massachusetts Institute of Technology].”

    “My priority now is to raise seed money to build my gadgets, protection may come later. Intellectual property seems to play a role only if you are a big businessman.” – Kenyan innovator

    Nii Simmonds, from Ghana, an entrepreneur and one of the founders and organisers of Maker Faire Africa, an annual innovation fair that showcases African talent in various technology fields agreed, and added that “though the abundance of talent is generally undoubted, there is need to identify the specific individuals or groups driving innovation at the grassroots.” According to him, it is these individuals and not big multinationals that demystify the idea of technology and help to make it accessible to local people.

    Simon Mwaura, a young innovator who developed a mobile phone-operated home security system (IPW, Education/R&D/Innovation, 19 October 2009) told Intellectual Property Watch, “my first mobile phone innovation, stirred a lot of interest amongst my neighbours and villagers, and many people urged me to take it forward – but no one quite knew where forward was.”

    Jeremiah Murimi, who with a colleague invented a mobile phone charger that uses energy generated from riding a bicycle (IPW, Education/R&D/Innovation, 19 October 2009), added that “many times we hold in our hands what may be a useful invention, but which the public will never enjoy because we do not know how to get it to them.”

    Simmonds of Maker Faire Africa said there is strong need to have a port of call to which innovators can reach out and obtain legal and financial advice. Organising innovation fairs, such as Maker Faire Africa, helps to meet part of this need, but because of its scale and seasonality, it is only able to identify and help a small part of the talent in the pool, he said. “In developed countries, the idea of innovation incubators is well established, whether publicly funded through universities or private investors,” he said. “It is very easy therefore to figure out your next stop after you have developed your idea.” However, even when talent is identified, scaling up of technologies still remains a significant challenge.

    Scaling up Ideas

    Pascal Katana, a Kenyan entrepreneur who has been featured in the media, here and here, for his inventions, told Intellectual Property Watch: “We have many ideas, we have developed prototypes, we know they are working and people are asking for them, but we have few funding options to meet this demand.”

    © Maker Faire Africa 2009 (Accra, Ghana)

    © Maker Faire Africa 2009 (Accra, Ghana)

    Katana added that though there is initial excitement when their ideas hit the media, none of his many innovations has gotten to the market. For instance, Katana has developed a “fish caller gadget” that can be used by fishermen to attract fish. The gadget mimics the sound of fish eating and attracts the fish around the device. The motion of the fish around the gadget triggers a mechanism that sends an SMS to the fisherman alerting him that his catch is ready. Katana said that getting the necessary funding to mass produce the fish caller has been a challenge despite the fact that several fishermen have asked him for it.

    For Simmonds, funding for African innovation is uniquely difficult. “There is the concept of the ‘missing middle’, the lack of investments larger than micro-finance loans but smaller than large-scale bank credit,” he said. He added that “this leaves a huge funding gap for innovators in Africa looking to scale up their innovations.”

    This is different from other regions, especially in the developed world, where there are many middle range investors supporting incubators, or actively looking to fund “the next big idea.” According to Eagle, there may be a role, therefore, for public institutions to meet this market gap, though he expressed scepticism about the long-term sustainability of subsidising local businesses with public funds. He said support to local entrepreneurs is crucial because “they are going to add more value and insight than large multinationals simply because of their more nuanced view of the local market.”

    Perceptions on the role of international organisations

    Those interviewed by Intellectual Property Watch said they had difficulty in seeing a role to be played in supporting local innovation by multilateral organisations such as the UN World Intellectual Property Organization or the World Trade Organization, which administers the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).

    Eagle from the Sante Fe Institute said “I have to admit that I’m fairly cynical about the value these international organisations can add to nurturing entrepreneurship in Africa.” He added, “While I’d love to be proven wrong, to date it doesn’t seem that these organisations have enough clout to instigate legitimate change on a national level.”

    Simmonds said that in various forums where technology innovators meet to share experiences, organisations such as WIPO and WTO have not featured because “our efforts have been focused on turning technological ideas into products and services.” He added, “multilateral organisations have not shown how they can feed into this into this immediate need.”

    Katana, the Kenyan innovator, said he has not even been able to protect his innovations due to the high cost of utility model registration. Utility model is a form of protection similar to patents, and is often given to innovations of an incremental character which may not meet the high patentability criteria.

    “My priority now is to raise seed money to build my gadgets, protection may come later,” he said. “Intellectual property seems to play a role only if you are a big businessman.”

    Eagle stated there is now a huge opportunity to legitimately compete with foreign companies who often subscribe to overly simplistic and homogeneous views of the “African market.” The African venture capital market is just starting to gain some traction, as investors are beginning to perceive legitimate commercial opportunities in these regions that he said to date have been overlooked by traditional venture capitalists.

    Robinson Esalimba is currently a researcher at Intellectual Property Watch focusing on technology transfer issues. He holds a law degree from the University of Nairobi and a masters degree in law with specialisation in intellectual property law from Lund University in Sweden.

    Robinson Esalimba may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. T.J James says:

      I perfectly agree with Robinson. I am working in the field of local innovation in India for last 10 years. The situation is similar in India too. Our innovators from rural villages have developed viable ideas and technologies, however most of the technologies needed further refinements, design modification, ergonometric interventions and development. For that they need incubation support. Besides IPR for local innovators don’t have much value. Excellent article


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.