SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »
  • I deeply apprecite the initiative to combat agains... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    ITU Panels: Innovation Makes ICTs A Moving Landscape; IP Dispute Resolution Rising

    Published on 14 October 2009 @ 4:36 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    Innovation in information and communications technologies during the economic downturn has brought shifts in the landscape with new technologies and newcomers in the market, according to speakers at a symposium organised by the World Intellectual Property Organization Arbitration and Mediation Center on 8 October. Meanwhile, dispute resolution involving intellectual property rights is on the rise, they said.

    The symposium was held within the 2009 United Nations International Telecommunication Union (ITU) Telecom World event held from 5-9 October, which brought participants from 186 countries, according to organisers.

    There are four sources of disputes in ICTs, said Christian Bovet, vice president of the Swiss Federal Communications Commission: liberalisation, the development of networks, hardware and applications.

    In a way, monopoly situations are easier to handle, Bovet said, as liberalisation creates new types of disputes between incumbents and newcomers, or between operators and other actors.

    Richard Owens, director of the WIPO Copyright E-Commerce, Technology and Management Division, said the percentage of non-internet domain disputes at the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center is: patents, 46 percent, IT/telecom, 22 percent, copyright, 9 percent, and trademarks, 5 percent.

    There has been a large upswing in disputes in the ICT sector, according to Gordon Moir, vice president of British Telecom. An increased number of players from different sectors are seeing a converging environment, such as bundled services, where for example mobile operators are seeking fixed access, and fixed operators are seeking mobile. There also is increased complexity such as disputes over access to monopoly infrastructure, access to content, or rates for international carriage. Regulatory players are also more numerous with courts, competition authorities, regulators and policymakers, who are more and more engaged, said Moir.

    Richard Vary, senior intellectual property rights litigation counsel for Nokia, said interoperability standards are essential. An increase in standards and patents in ICTs has brought new challenges such as balancing the interests of the different actors, like patent holders, consumers, and third parties in dispute resolution.

    Other challenges for dispute resolution come from differences such as “national rights” and international industry, and issues such as the competence of tribunals in addressing a large number of patents, technical infringement arguments and IP validity. The process also needs to offer reasonable costs and timescales, Vary said.

    There is a gap between two models, said Richard Keck of law firm Macmillan Keck. On one hand is the regulated public utility model, which pushes towards openness with open access, rate regulations, and universal service obligations. On the other hand there is a push towards ownership under the traditional IP model, with patents, copyrights, trade secrets and privacy and data protection rights, he said.

    The same pattern exists with telecommunications, where the telecom regulator pushes from ownership to openness and the patent offices are pushing the other way, Keck said.

    Owens said WIPO has set up on request Expedited Arbitration for AGICOA, a collective society of film producers which collects for cable distribution. Contract disputes arise over royalties, and this mechanism allows for settlement if necessary. Now WIPO is establishing a new Arbitration and Mediation Center office in Singapore, which should open in January 2010. WIPO and the government of Singapore are developing a scheme for expedited arbitration for film and media-related disputes.

    YouTube Committed To Copyright Protection

    For Yoram Elkaim, senior legal counsel for South and Eastern Europe, Middle East and Africa at Google, every Google activity has some relation to copyright issues. Google acquired video-sharing website YouTube two years ago, said Elkaim, and about 20 minutes of video are added every single minute and 350 million unique users visit the site every month.

    The question is not whether the content on YouTube is copyrighted but rather if the content was posted by the rights holder, said Elkaim.

    Different rights can co-exist in a single video, such as screenplay, photography and sound recording. There are also different rights in different territories so it is sometimes difficult for a platform like YouTube to investigate, he said. However, YouTube has a longstanding commitment to copyright protection, Elkaim said.

    User education, prominent copyright warnings, and limiting regular user uploads to 10 minutes to avoid the upload of full-length commercial television programming and movies are all part of YouTube’s effort to limit infringement. YouTube also has set up a content identification system that allows them to “fingerprint” content to protect rights holders.

    Regulators should have a more active role in dispute resolution, said Pierre-Yves Gunter of Python and Peter in Switzerland. Commercial arbitration offers many advantages in telecommunications disputes, he said. Key factors include: the choice of arbitrators, their specialisation, their ability to grant interim relief, as well as the choice of applicable law, arbitration venue, language, and the limited grounds for appeal. The only disadvantages are costs and confidentially not being fully protected under institutional rules, said Gunter.

    With 4.6 billion mobile subscriptions globally by the end of 2009, according to the ITU, and a rapidly rising growth in ICTs in many parts of the world, the ITU World 2009 event called for increased collaboration and high-level dialogue in order to make global networks accessible to more users. The digital divide should be reduced and all actors should work towards the Millennium Development Goals, according to an ITU press release.

    Some technology experts also called upon the ITU to provide a platform to shape the global ICT standardisation landscape, according to an ITU press release. During a meeting held at the ITU on 6 October, ITU senior management and technology leaders, 19 private-sector chief technology officers called for a unified international approach to technology development. Standards are increasingly important in “the rapidly evolving information society,” they said, adding that standards are a “universal language” promoting innovation, effectiveness and efficiency.

    Catherine Saez may be reached at csaez@ip-watch.ch.

     


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.