<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Oversight For Internet; US Role In Core Infrastructure Unchanged</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/10/01/global-oversight-for-icann-us-role-in-core-infrastructure-unchanged/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/10/01/global-oversight-for-icann-us-role-in-core-infrastructure-unchanged/</link>
	<description>Original news and analysis on international IP policy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:31:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Oversight For ICANN; US Role In Core Infrastructure Unchanged – Lega Digital</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/10/01/global-oversight-for-icann-us-role-in-core-infrastructure-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-3207392</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Oversight For ICANN; US Role In Core Infrastructure Unchanged – Lega Digital</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 04:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=6532#comment-3207392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Link to the article: http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=6532 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Link to the article: <a href="http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=6532" rel="nofollow">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=6532</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thierry Moreau</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/10/01/global-oversight-for-icann-us-role-in-core-infrastructure-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-3207337</link>
		<dc:creator>Thierry Moreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 21:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=6532#comment-3207337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An update:

NTIA has made public the IANA contract extension to September 30, 2010. The announcement itself has been back-dated from today or yesterday to last September 1st. No further comment. (http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/iana.htm)

Still up to 30 months to go!

The TLD operators community has some wishes for operational improvements which can hardly be met with the current institutional arrangement.

Regards,

- Thierry Moreau]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An update:</p>
<p>NTIA has made public the IANA contract extension to September 30, 2010. The announcement itself has been back-dated from today or yesterday to last September 1st. No further comment. (<a href="http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/iana.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/iana.htm</a>)</p>
<p>Still up to 30 months to go!</p>
<p>The TLD operators community has some wishes for operational improvements which can hardly be met with the current institutional arrangement.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>- Thierry Moreau</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thierry Moreau</title>
		<link>http://www.ip-watch.org/2009/10/01/global-oversight-for-icann-us-role-in-core-infrastructure-unchanged/comment-page-1/#comment-3207112</link>
		<dc:creator>Thierry Moreau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 15:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ip-watch.org/weblog/?p=6532#comment-3207112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed, as long as the IANA contract is in force according to its latest terms, the US government role is unchanged in some fundamental aspects.

But as we comment on the impact of the AoC, there is no primary source (i.e. a specific NTIA or ICANN press release) supporting the fact that the IANA contract has been extended beyond the end of last month (Milton&#039;s words are just his, I did bring his attention to the specific page on NTIA web page where the latest IANA contract extension is absent).

Being reluctant to take the IANA extension for granted based on secondary sources, I find it strange that NTIA, apparently so dedicated to transparency and Internet stability, omits to indicate the current arrangements for the IANA function!

Regards,

- Thierry Moreau]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed, as long as the IANA contract is in force according to its latest terms, the US government role is unchanged in some fundamental aspects.</p>
<p>But as we comment on the impact of the AoC, there is no primary source (i.e. a specific NTIA or ICANN press release) supporting the fact that the IANA contract has been extended beyond the end of last month (Milton&#8217;s words are just his, I did bring his attention to the specific page on NTIA web page where the latest IANA contract extension is absent).</p>
<p>Being reluctant to take the IANA extension for granted based on secondary sources, I find it strange that NTIA, apparently so dedicated to transparency and Internet stability, omits to indicate the current arrangements for the IANA function!</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>- Thierry Moreau</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

 Served from: www.ip-watch.org @ 2013-05-24 23:10:13 by W3 Total Cache -->