SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

How Listing Ukraine As A Priority Foreign Country In Special 301 Violates WTO Agreements

Prof. Sean Flynn asks whether US sanctions of Ukraine under the US Special 301 program violates World Trade Organization rules. He also asks whether the operation of watch lists threatening sanctions for intellectual property matters could be challenged under the WTO even prior to any sanction going into effect.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Survey: US 19th In Global IP Protection

    Published on 13 September 2009 @ 4:53 pm

    Intellectual Property Watch

    The United States, often seen as toughest on other nations for their perceived failure to protect US intellectual property rights, was itself 19th [note: corrected from earlier version] in the world in such protection last year, according to the latest World Economic Forum survey on competitiveness. Some of those scoring higher have been criticised in the past year by the US for lax IP protection. Overall, the US was replaced by Switzerland as the most competitive country.

    WEF report here [pdf]. Full IP protection list on page 347.

    WEF press release here.

    The US Chamber of Commerce industry group in a blog post said the low ranking is evidence of the need for stronger protection measures by the United States in the international context (rather than within its borders), saying the survey captures the perception of others of the US “stance” on IP protection.

    The top 50 from the survey:

    1.02 Intellectual property protection
    How would you rate intellectual property protection, including anti-counterfeiting measures, in your country? (1 = very weak; 7 = very

    strong) | 2008–2009 weighted average

    RANK COUNTRY/ECONOMY SCORE MEAN: 3.8
    1 Singapore ………………………6.2
    2 Sweden…………………………6.1
    3 Finland…………………………..6.1
    4 Switzerland ……………………6.1
    5 Austria…………………………..6.1
    6 Denmark ……………………….6.0
    7 New Zealand………………….6.0
    8 Luxembourg…………………..5.9
    9 Netherlands……………………5.8
    10 France …………………………..5.8
    11 Puerto Rico ……………………5.8
    12 Australia ………………………..5.8
    13 Germany ……………………….5.7
    14 Norway………………………….5.7
    15 United Arab Emirates………5.6
    16 Ireland …………………………..5.6
    17 Iceland…………………………..5.5
    18 Canada ………………………….5.5
    19 United States …………………5.4
    20 Japan…………………………….5.4
    21 United Kingdom ……………..5.3
    22 Belgium…………………………5.3
    23 Hong Kong SAR……………..5.3
    24 South Africa …………………..5.2
    25 Bahrain ………………………….5.1
    26 Oman ……………………………5.0
    27 Taiwan, China…………………5.0
    28 Barbados ……………………….4.9
    29 Cyprus…………………………..4.7
    30 Jordan …………………………..4.7
    31 Saudi Arabia …………………..4.6
    32 Namibia …………………………4.6
    33 Portugal…………………………4.6
    34 Estonia ………………………….4.6
    35 Gambia, The…………………..4.6
    36 Qatar …………………………….4.5
    37 Malaysia ………………………..4.5
    38 Slovenia…………………………4.5
    39 Malta …………………………….4.4
    40 Spain …………………………….4.3
    41 Korea, Rep. ……………………4.2
    42 Greece ………………………….4.1
    43 Tunisia …………………………..4.0
    44 Israel …………………………….4.0
    45 China …………………………….4.0
    46 Czech Republic ………………4.0
    47 Kuwait …………………………..4.0
    48 Mauritius ……………………….4.0
    49 Botswana………………………3.9
    50 Italy ………………………………3.9

    Categories: IP-Watch Briefs, English

     

    Comments

    1. Moved Temporarily says:

      [...] this year to Switzerland. So it goes. But tucked back in the report’s list of data tables was a fascinating one about intellectual property, and it put the US in 19th place worldwide when it comes to protecting [...]

    2. US Chamber of Commerce cites #19 rank, wants tougher IP laws | UpOff.com says:

      [...] year to Switzerland. So it goes. But tucked back in the report’s list of data tables was a fascinating one about intellectual property, and it put the US in 19th place worldwide when it comes to protecting [...]

    3. Quick Thoughts on IP Protection « Run with the Law says:

      [...] recent World Economic Forum survey rated the US 19th in IP Protection.  As Nate Anderson (over at Ars Technica) points out [...]

    4. Scholarly Communications @ Duke » The joy of statistics says:

      [...] property.  The United States ranks 19th on this chart, out of 133 countries rated.  As this blog post from IP Watch reports, that ranking prompted The US Chamber of Commerce to call for stronger protection measures [...]

    5. US Chamber of Commerce cites #19 rank, wants tougher IP laws | Superstars Of Gaming says:

      [...] year to Switzerland. So it goes. But tucked back in the report’s list of data tables was a fascinating one about intellectual property, and it put the US in 19th place worldwide when it comes to protecting [...]

    6. Web News Site » Blog Archive » Chamber Of Commerce Gets Basic Stats Backwards, Calls For Stronger US Patent Protection For No Good Reason says:

      [...] in how strong our intellectual property laws are. This report caused the US Chamber of Commerce to say it’s evidence that the US needs stronger IP laws. Yet, Smith points out how silly this analysis is. First, being 19th out of 133 is already pretty [...]

    7. The Big Mean IP Machine « The Sound of Brett says:

      [...] skewing the minds of these American business leaders… Thanks to Ars, as always. The List is here, on IP [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 184.72.184.104