SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    OECD: Tech R&D, Innovation Hard-Hit By Economy, But May Be Turning Up

    Published on 28 July 2009 @ 5:53 pm

    By , Intellectual Property Watch

    Information and communications technology (ICT) industries have been hard hit by the economic crisis but vary in the degree to which they have been able to sustain spending on research and development, according to a new report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Now there are signs the worst may be over for the sector if it can benefit from innovation to address social challenges.

    The report shows that most recent economic data indicate a reversal of fortunes for the technology industry. The report, which compares the current period with the 2001-2002 “dot-com bust,” found that economic stimulus packages might be a contributor.

    The OECD report is available here [pdf]. The Paris-based group represents 30 of the world’s largest industrialised countries.

    “ICT R&D is declining, but it is performing somewhat better than employment and certainly better than production and revenues, as was the case in the last downturn,” the OECD report said. “Where R&D is declining it is with a lag compared with turnover and employment, as investments in R&D and innovation are clearly seen as necessary for future competitiveness and the development of new growth areas.”

    Generally speaking, it appears companies that retained access to capital sustained R&D as much as possible. OECD said typically in the medium-term of a recession there is a decrease in R&D and innovation, but that these drop more significantly as the crisis persists and priorities are abandoned.

    “A neglect of key R&D priorities would also mean that the ICT sector will be less able to deliver solutions to societal challenges,” it said.

    IP Questions

    Some questions arise regarding the impact in the ICT sector and intellectual property rights, particularly with regard to Asia. “Will the crisis have lasting effects on the global ICT production and innovation networks, significantly changing the balance of IP ownership between Asia and the West?” asked Sacha Wunsch-Vincent, an OECD economist and one of the report’s authors.

    “The question is how the significant downturn in Asia will influence the Asian ICT producers in the future,” he added. “As recovery seems to loom, will ICT firms in China, Singapore, Chinese Taipei (Taiwan), Malaysia and the like continue to operate as manufacturers for household brands such as HP, Dell, Apple, and others? Or will they be tempted to operate under their own brand name and with their own intellectual property as they prefer to build their own domestic market.”

    Wunsch-Vincent also said: “If designed well, the stimulus measures aimed at the ICT industry and implemented in the Asian economies – notably in Taiwan for semiconductor industry but also Japan and Korea – will have an effect on the future growth prospects of domestic ICT brands and with them their intellectual property portfolio.”

    Sectoral Impact

    Impact of the crisis and response related to R&D has varied by sector. “Despite generally good industry R&D performance in Q1 2009 and continuing support for R&D in Q2, some hard hit sectors such as electronics and semiconductors were however beginning to perform worse in R&D than in 2001,” OECD said.

    For new firms, venture capital “slowed very markedly” from mid-2008, it said. “Nevertheless around one-half continues to flow into the ICT sector and ICT-intensive clean technologies, and surveys suggest that software, new media and particularly clean technologies will continue to attract a major share of venture investments.”

    In the information technology sector, US companies were not as hard hit as Asian firms, OECD found, and Apple continued to post positive revenues. IT firms generally reduced R&D spending. Among communications companies, Nokia increased its R&D spending slightly in first quarter 2009 by 2 percent, while R&D investment by Qualcomm was 9 percent. It was negative for some other leading firms.

    The electronics sector’s declines exceeded those of the dot-com bust in 2001, OECD said. “Falling revenues in combination with negative net cash have increased the pressure on R&D budgets in this sector,” it said.

    In software, the 10 percent increase in R&D by the top 10 firms slowed to a negative growth rate in 2009. Microsoft accounted for some 46 percent of R&D spending in 2008.

    For internet companies like Google and Yahoo, the factors are different. Among the top 10 companies, “total growth dropped to just below zero in the first quarter of 2009, indicating that internet businesses are not crisis-proof,” OECD said. This sector is “better placed” than it was in 2001-2002. R&D spending in this sector had been very high in the past year (65 percent increase in quarterly spending) but slowed to a slight positive increase in the first quarter of 2009.

    Telecommunications and internet services have been mixed. It said internet telephony has in some cases become a substitute for fixed-line telephony. There should be some benefit from stimulus packages targeting high-speed broadband outlay and other infrastructure, OECD said.

    “Top-10 telecommunications firms are deeply in debt with around negative US$350 billion net cash throughout 2008 and the first quarter of 2009,” OECD found. All but one telecom company, China Mobile, had negative net cash in the beginning of 2009. “With more than US$18 billion, China Mobile is one of the richest firms in the ICT sector after Microsoft with US$23 billion. In contrast, NTT had the lowest net cash with negative US$31 billion among telecommunication firms,” it said.

    Long-term prospects for ICTs are good, but investment is volatile, and consumer spending has dropped sharply. The report compares the current economic downturn, the longest in 50 years, with the technology crash of 2001-2002. Performance in the first sector of 2009, when the industry saw a sharp decline, compared with the earlier period.

    “In general, despite a very difficult first quarter large firms in the ICT sector were stronger at the end of Q1 2009 than following the 2001 dot.com bust,” the report said, though some hardware sectors continue to face tougher prospects.

    Semiconductors are a “bellwether” for ICT goods, OECD said, and dropped by some 50 percent from late 2008 to early 2009. They are expected to drop a further 20 percent by year’s end. The industry is healthier than in 2001, however. ICTs have fared better than some other industries, such as automobiles, it said.

    OECD said ICTs are contributing to an increased focus during the recession on social and public policy aspects of innovation, such as climate change, public health, education and energy efficiency. Investment in ICTs leads to increased innovation in other sectors and at different levels, it said.

    Key ICT-related policies need to be reviewed in light of the new conditions, OECD said. “There are huge and interesting questions about how the crisis will change industry structures which are originally globalised production networks,” said Wunsch-Vincent. “Will all stay as before? Will it all change? What role will stimulus packages and government strategy play?”

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Microsoft Israel Labs says:

      The global ICT industry is showing signs of recovery from the economic downturn, according to a report by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 173.199.115.35