SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.

Advertisement


Inside Views

Submit ideas to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch!

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

WHO Should Have The Evidence? Ben Goldacre Refutes WHO Director’s Claim

“Bad Science” adversary and journalist, Dr Ben Goldacre, this week challenged WHO Director of Ethics and Social Determinants of Health, Dr Rüdiger Krech, on his understanding of published evidence.





Latest Comments
  • As it happens, I own and create "intellectual prop... »
  • So long term planning of the UN Development Decade... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A directory of IP delegates in Geneva. Read more>

    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    EU, US Consumer Groups Issue Resolution On Enforcement; Demand Role In ACTA

    Published on 23 June 2009 @ 11:23 am

    By for Intellectual Property Watch and

    An international coalition of consumer groups has issued a resolution calling into question global enforcement policy and offering core principles for policymakers to consider in setting new enforcement standards.

    The Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue on 18 June issued the resolution on the enforcement of copyright, trademarks, patents and other intellectual property rights. The TACD is a trade advisory body to the European Union and United States government, and brings together 80 member organisations from those regions, claiming a direct paid-up membership of some 20 million consumers.

    The resolution calls for a halt to the plurilateral negotiation of an Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) led by the United States, until the negotiating texts are made available to consumer groups and other conditions are met.

    TACD wants future negotiations to be respectful of civil liberties such as the right to privacy and also demands the inclusion of developing countries in ACTA negotiations as the stated intention is to extend and apply the treaty to them. The resolution offers recommendations to ensure IP enforcement policies and practices address issues such as transparency, evidence and process, competitiveness, consumer protection, human rights, access to knowledge, and digital rights.

    The resolution reflects discussions TACD had with representatives from the EU and the US government on 9 June, during the TACD 10th annual meeting in Brussels (IPW, Enforcement, 11 June 2009). But the resolution was released for the first time on 18 June and forms part of a larger effort by TACD to push back on the IP rights enforcement issues, according to consumer representatives.

    The resolution comes at a time when governments in Europe and North America are considering a wide range of new global standards for IP enforcement. Among those new norms are ACTA, new customs procedures through the World Customs Organization (WCO), anti-counterfeiting measures at the World Health Organization (WHO), World Trade Organization (WTO) disputes over enforcement, and proposals in Europe for “graduated response” penalties and other internet filtering solutions. It also includes EU directives and bills pending before the US Congress and other countries to further strengthen IP enforcement, bilateral trade agreements, and unilateral trade sanctions by the EU and the US.

    “All those with an interest in public health need to be very worried about the intellectual property enforcement agenda,” Sophie Bloemen of Health Action International (HAI), a TACD member, said in a statement along with 10 other groups. “Some of the enforcement initiatives developed under the guise of ‘anti-counterfeiting’ moves will in reality hamper the legitimate trade in generics and as a result pose a serious threat to access to essential medicines in developing countries.”

    “The global push by incumbent multinational corporations for lopsided regulation to protect their business models negotiated behind closed doors is undermining public confidence in the important fight to protect consumers against counterfeiting and piracy,” said Eddan Katz of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), another TACD member. “We call for responsible policymaking on IP enforcement based on empirical evidence and meaningful public debate, especially at this pivotal moment of technological innovation. The future of the knowledge economy for the benefit of many rather than the few is what is at stake in the wrong direction now taken by our trade negotiators.”

    According to Anne-Catherine Lorrain of the TACD secretariat, the organisation will be scheduling meetings with various US and EU agencies, EU members of parliament and US congressional members to follow up on the resolution recommendations.

    Robinson Esalimba may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

    William New may be reached at wnew@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. Open Rights Group Newsblog : Blog Archive says:

      [...] Source: Intellectual Property Watch [...]

    2. Consumer groups around the world demand transparency on secret copyright treaty | Design Website Easy says:

      [...] EU, US Consumer Groups Issue Resolution On Enforcement; Demand Role In ACTA [...]

    3. Liberdades e separação de poderes « O Insurgente says:

      [...] Liberdades e separação de poderes Arquivar em: Blogosfera, Economia, Internacional, Justiça, Portugal — ruicarmo @ 18:46 Uma actualização. [...]

    4. Consumer groups around the world demand transparency on secret copyright treaty says:

      [...] EU, US Consumer Groups Issue Resolution On Enforcement; Demand Role In ACTA [...]

    5. Transatlantic coalition calls for "halt" to ACTA talks says:

      [...] Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) has called for a total suspension of treaty negotiations “until the EU and the US publish the full text of all negotiating documents and agree to [...]

    6. Transatlantic coalition calls for "halt" to ACTA talks | Supossably says:

      [...] Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) has called for a total suspension of treaty negotiations “until the EU and the US publish the full text of all negotiating documents and agree to [...]

    7. Transatlantic coalition calls for "halt" to ACTA talks | UpOff.com says:

      [...] Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) has called for a total suspension of treaty negotiations “until the EU and the US publish the full text of all negotiating documents and agree to [...]

    8. Transatlantic coalition calls for "halt" to ACTA talks | Techdare says:

      [...] Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) has called for a total suspension of treaty negotiations “until the EU and the US publish the full text of all negotiating documents and agree to [...]

    9. Weitere Verschärfung des Urheberrechts « 11k2 says:

      [...] Während von Regierungen und Industrievertretern weiter unter Ausschluss der Öffentlichkeit am ACTA-Abkommen gefeilt wird (siehe 11k2), das alle teilnehmenden Nationen zu extremer Urheberrechtsverschärfung [...]

    10. Anti-pirataria: consumidores querem suspensão do tratado ACTA | Remixtures says:

      [...] o IP Watch, os membros da TACD publicaram uma resolução sobre a aplicação do direito de autor, marcas [...]

    11. Consumer Groups Want to Halt ACTA Negotiations says:

      [...] and getting a chance to look at ACTA themselves. That’s currently what has been reported by IP Watch: The Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue on 18 June issued the resolution on the enforcement of [...]

    12. Get your News » Transatlantic coalition calls for "halt" to ACTA talks says:

      [...] Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) has called for a total suspension of treaty negotiations “until the EU and the US publish the full text of all negotiating documents and agree to [...]

    13. Click World News » Blog Archive » Consumer Group Wants ACTA Discussions Stopped Until Consumer Rights Are Represented In Negotiations says:

      [...] active participants in the process. Now, a group called the Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue has demanded ACTA negotiations be put on hold until consumer groups have a real seat at the table, or at least are given access to documents [...]

    14. Nowinki » Consumer Group Wants ACTA Discussions Stopped Until Consumer Rights Are Represented In Negotiations says:

      [...] active participants in the process. Now, a group called the Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue has demanded ACTA negotiations be put on hold until consumer groups have a real seat at the table, or at least are given access to documents [...]

    15. Universities Allied for Essential Medicines » ACTA Consultations in Canada says:

      [...] This week UAEM was invited along with Doctors Without Borders/MSF and Oxfam to participate in Canadian government consultations on the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). ACTA is has been highly controversial due to the secrecy with which it has been negotiated and the lack of clarity of the intentions of the negotiating parties. You can read more about the controversy here. [...]


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

     

     
    Your IP address is 23.20.196.179