SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Subscribing entitles a reader to complete stories on all topics released as they happen, special features, confidential documents and access to the complete, searchable story archive online back to 2004.
IP-Watch Briefs

Advertisement


Inside Views

Contribute your views! Submit an Inside Views idea to info [at] ip-watch [dot] ch.

We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.

Occupy IP: New Economy Businesses Clash With Old

It may be too much, too late for content providers finally trying to tame the internet, and a fresh approach is needed, writes Bruce Berman.




Special Reports

Non-Communicable Diseases Issue Energises Public Health Policymakers Read More >


Latest Comments
  • Copyrights are unique works set in a concrete mode... »
  • I deeply apprecite the initiative to combat agains... »

  • For IPW Subscribers
    A guide to Geneva-based public health and intellectual property organisations. Read More >

    Monthly Reporter

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter, published from 2004 to January 2011, is a 16-page monthly selection of the most important, updated stories and features, plus the People and News Briefs columns.

    The Intellectual Property Watch Monthly Reporter is available in an online archive on the IP-Watch website, available for IP-Watch Subscribers.

    Access the Monthly Reporter Archive >


    Thailand Seeks To Toughen IP Laws to Punish Buyers Of Pirated Or Fake Goods

    Published on 19 June 2009 @ 2:20 pm

    By for Intellectual Property Watch

    BANGKOK – Thailand plans to toughen its intellectual property protection law to punish, for the first time, buyers of products that breach copyright and trademark laws, aiming primarily at pirated music and movies and fake brand-name goods, a senior Thai official said Thursday.

    In an effort to fight increased infringement of local music and movies, the plan includes amending current laws also to penalise lessors of any property used for manufacturing, storing or selling products that violate the copyrights and trademark laws.

    “Currently, we can only punish producers or sellers of such products,” said Pajchima Tanasanti, deputy director general of the Department of Intellectual Property in the Ministry of Commerce, in an interview with Intellectual Property Watch. “But on the other side of the story, we have people who want to buy these products because they are cheap.”

    She added: “Under current laws, these buyers commit no offence.”

    The move would entail amending the Copyright Act of 1994 and the Trademark Act of 1991 – the two current key pieces of legislation that protect copyright holders of music and movies and brand-name trademarks.

    Pajchima, who supervises the copyright and trademark units of her department, said there have been increased complaints from copyright holders of Thai music and movies of pirated video CDs (VCDs) in the market. “We have to admit that there really have been a huge number of these pirated copies of music and movies flooding the market,” she said.

    Heavily hit is the Thai music industry as Thai youngsters have recently turned toward a preference for Thai music over Western tunes. Pajchima said about 30 companies that hold rights to the commercial use of Thai country music have recently gone out of business because of losses due to the much cheaper pirated copies available in the market.

    She said just on Wednesday, Thai police and officials of her department raided a building in a Bangkok suburb that housed a major manufacturing shop of pirated music and movie, and found 40,000 such copies of Thai and foreign music and movies. She added that 80 percent of pirated music CDs is now Thai songs while the other 20 percent is foreign. On pirated movies, Thai and foreign films take up equal proportion.

    Pajchima said since the current government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva came into power in late December 2008, it has paid greater attention to preventing violations of intellectual property rights.

    In January 2009, the Abhisit government set up, for the first time, a national committee for the prevention and suppression of violations of intellectual property, chaired by the prime minister.

    In the proposed amendment draft to the 1994 Copyright Act, buyers of pirated copies of music or movies would be seen as committing copyright infringement and could be subject to a maximum fine of 1,000 Thai baht (about US$29) or doing community service.

    For lessors of property used for manufacturing, storing or selling pirated products, they could be subject to an imprisonment term of three months to two years, or a fine of 50,000 baht to 400,000 baht (about US$1,470 to $11,760), or both.

    If these provisions become law, it is likely that in future property leasing agreement in Thailand, lessors would add requirements that lessees must not use the property to manufacture, store or sell any pirated copies of music or movies.

    In the proposed amendment draft to the Trademark Act of 1991, buyers of products with counterfeit trademark also could be subject to a maximum fine of 1,000 baht or doing community service.

    For lessors of property used for manufacturing, storing or selling of products with a counterfeit trademark, they could be subject to an imprisonment term of two to four years, or a fine of 200,000 to 400,000 baht (US$5,880 to US$11,760), or both.

    In the amendments to the Trademark Act, it also proposes a minimum punishment of two years and a minimum fine of 200,000 baht for any counterfeiting of trademarks. Currently, the Act does not specify any minimum penalty, allowing the court to use its discretion in setting the punishment as long as it does not exceed the maximum term of four years of imprisonment and a fine of 400,000 baht.

    Those who imitate a registered trademark with the intention to deceive the public would also be subject to a minimum jail term of six months and a minimum fine of 50,000 baht ($1,470). Currently, the Act sets only the maximum term of two years in jail and 200,000 baht in fine.

    Pajchima said the two drafts would now await the approval of the cabinet and then the parliament for approval before becoming law.

    Sinfah Tunsarawuth may be reached at info@ip-watch.ch.

     

    Comments

    1. norris hall says:

      Of course, in the past, official raids against vendors selling pirated goods was a big joke. The vendors would be notified days in advance of any raid and officials showed up with tv cameramen in tow to document the event.
      As soon as they were gone the Thai vendors would open for business as usual.
      If you are looking for pirated CD, movies and software try Pantip Plaza. It is well known to house the most complete selection of pirated music, movies and software in Bangkok.
      For 5 dollars you can by software that retails for $2000 in the US.
      I have my doubts that the Thai governemt is serious about Piracy.
      Perhaps it is only interested in protecting Thai music and movie companies but as for foreign patent holders they could care less.
      After all, cracking down on vendor selling bootlegged copies of Microsoft Office would just force Thais to have to buy legitimate copies from the US. And that would mean money flowing out of the country.

    2. Pintas-IPHall provides intellectual property, copyright, trademark and patent for small and medium companies. Trademark logo and patent industrial design for South East Asia. Pintas IP intellectual Property Company based in Malaysia. says:

      [...] For more… [...]

    3. 위조 상표 구매자를 처벌하는 법을 태국에서 제정키로 « Korea IP Law Blog says:

      [...] 위조 상품과 불법복제품을 구매하는 자도 처벌하는 법을 만들려고 한다는 기사가 떴네요. 더불어 위조 상품이나 불법복제품을 제작하고 저장하기 위하여 [...]

    4. kai says:

      I second norris hall’s comment.

      It is my impression that the Thai government hasn’t been fully enforcing its existing laws of IPR enforcement. We’ve seen times and times again that a law not adequately enforced renders the judicial branch (usually the prosecutors) have bigger power that is not adequately checked by others. And the prosecution usually goes rotten.

    5. Sam says:

      I would like to ask anyone who knows whether this kind of law is used else where? I heard from somewhere that France also punishes buyers, but not sure about other countries.. Please confirm. thanks.

    6. Anthony La Rocca says:

      @Sam: These laws apply here in Canada…that is for sure!


    Leave a Reply

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website. By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    We welcome your participation in article and blog comment threads, and other discussion forums, where we encourage you to analyse and react to the content available on the Intellectual Property Watch website.

    By participating in discussions or reader forums, or by submitting opinion pieces or comments to articles, blogs, reviews or multimedia features, you are consenting to these rules.

    1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You will not knowingly post content that violates the copyright, trademark, patent or other intellectual property right of any third party or which you know is under a confidentiality obligation preventing its publication and that you will request removal of the same should you discover that you have violated this provision. Likewise, you may not post content that is libelous, defamatory, obscene, abusive, that violates a third party's right to privacy, that otherwise violates any applicable local, state, national or international law, that amounts to spamming or that is otherwise inappropriate. You may not post content that degrades others on the basis of gender, race, class, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sexual preference, disability or other classification. Epithets and other language intended to intimidate or to incite violence are also prohibited. Furthermore, you may not impersonate others.

    2. You understand and agree that Intellectual Property Watch is not responsible for any content posted by you or third parties. You further understand that IP Watch does not monitor the content posted. Nevertheless, IP Watch may monitor the any user-generated content as it chooses and reserves the right to remove, edit or otherwise alter content that it deems inappropriate for any reason whatever without consent nor notice. We further reserve the right, in our sole discretion, to remove a user's privilege to post content on our site. IP Watch is not in any manner endorsing the content of the discussion forums and cannot and will not vouch for its reliability or otherwise accept liability for it.

    3. By submitting any contribution to IP Watch, you warrant that your contribution is your own original work and that you have the right to make it available to IP Watch for all purposes and you agree to indemnify IP Watch, its directors, employees and agents against all damages, legal fees and others expenses that may be incurred by IP Watch as a result of your breach of warranty or of these terms.

    4. You further agree not to publish any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example telephone number or home address). If you add a comment to a blog, be aware that your email address will be apparent.

    5. IP Watch will not be liable for any loss including but not limited to the following (whether such losses are foreseen, known or otherwise): loss of data, loss of revenue or anticipated profit, loss of business, loss of opportunity, loss of goodwill or injury to reputation, losses suffered by third parties, any indirect, consequential or exemplary damages.

    6. You understand and agree that the discussion forums are to be used only for non-commercial purposes. You may not solicit funds, promote commercial entities or otherwise engage in commercial activity in our discussion forums.

    7. You acknowledge and agree that you use and/or rely on any information obtained through the discussion forums at your own risk.

    8. For any content that you post, you hereby grant to IP Watch the royalty-free, irrevocable, perpetual, exclusive and fully sub-licensable license to use, reproduce, modify, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, distribute, perform and display such content in whole or in part, world-wide and to incorporate it in other works, in any form, media or technology now known or later developed.

    9. These terms and your posts and contributions shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of Switzerland (without giving effect to conflict of laws principles thereof) and any dispute exclusively settled by the Courts of the Canton of Geneva.